Article

Effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioural group intervention for knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (Impact Factor: 1.9). 01/2013; 14(1):46. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-46
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background
Knee osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, with pain being its most common symptom. Little is known about the psychological aspects of knee osteoarthritis pain. There is an emerging consensus among osteoarthritis specialists about the importance of addressing not only biological but also psychosocial factors in the assessment and treatment of osteoarthritis. As few studies have evaluated the effect of psychological interventions on knee osteoarthritis pain, good quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine their effectiveness.

Methods/Design
We intend to conduct a 6-week single-blinded randomized controlled trial with a 12-month follow-up. Altogether, 108 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading (KL 2–4) of knee osteoarthritis will be included. The clinical inclusion criteria are pain within the last year in or around the knee occurring on most days for at least one month, and knee pain of ≥40 mm on a 100-mm visual analogue scale in the WOMAC pain subscale for one week prior to study entry. Patients with any severe psychiatric disorder, other back or lower limb pain symptoms more aggravating than knee pain, or previous or planned lower extremity joint surgery will be excluded. The patients will be randomly assigned to a combined GP care and cognitive-behavioral intervention group (n = 54) or to a GP care control group (n = 54). The cognitive-behavioral intervention will consist of 6 weekly group sessions supervised by a psychologist and a physiotherapist experienced in the treatment of pain. The main goals of the intervention are to reduce maladaptive pain coping and to increase the self-management of pain and disability. The follow-up-points will be arranged at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome measure will be the WOMAC pain subscale. Secondary outcome measures will include self-reports of pain and physical function, a health related quality of life questionnaire, and various psychological questionnaires. Personnel responsible of the data analysis will be blinded.

Discussion
This study addresses the current topic of non-pharmacological conservative treatment of knee OA-related pain. We anticipate that these results will provide important new insights to the current care recommendations.

Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN64794760

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Sanna Sinikallio, Mar 11, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
86 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common type of arthritis and imposes a heavy burden on individual welfare among elderly people. There is preliminary evidence that psychological factors play a role in functional ability and pain in knee OA patients, particularly with respect to the surgery outcome. Less is known about psychological factors among community-dwelling patients with knee OA. Objectives: We aimed to determine which psychological factors are associated with pain and functional ability among community-dwelling knee OA patients using a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires. Methods: In the cross-sectional baseline setting of a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study, 111 patients aged from 35 to 75 years with clinical symptoms and radiographic grading of knee OA were included. They completed a comprehensive set of psychological questionnaires, including measures of resources and coping, fear and catastrophizing, and distress. Results: In cross-sectional comparisons, pain self-efficacy, fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, and elevated anxiety were associated with pain and a poorer functional ability. In logistic regression analysis, independent association was seen between pain self-efficacy and poorer functioning. Knee OA patients also reported elevated levels of anxiety. Conclusions: The results reveal that both pain self-efficacy and negatively charged emotion and expectations toward pain are important factors when dealing with knee OA patients. Failure to consider these will probably contribute to prolonged disability and further pain. The results call for the routine assessment of multiple psychological factors in knee OA.
    Journal of clinical rheumatology: practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases 07/2014; 20(5). DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000000123 · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background A stepped care strategy (SCS) to improve adequate healthcare use in patients with osteoarthritis was developed and implemented in a primary care region in the Netherlands. Aim To assess the association between care that is in line with the SCS recommendations and health outcomes. Design and setting Data were used from a 2-year observational study of 313 patients who had consulted their GP because of osteoarthritis. Method Care was considered 'SCS-consistent' if all advised modalities of the previous steps of the SCS were offered before more advanced modalities of subsequent steps. Pain and physical function were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (range 0-100); active pain coping with the Pain Coping Inventory (range 10-40); and self-efficacy with the Dutch General Self-Efficacy Scale (range 12-48). Crude and adjusted associations between SCS-consistent care and outcomes were estimated with generalised estimating equations. Results No statistically significant differences were found in changes over a 2-year period in pain and physical function between patients who received SCS-inconsistent care (n = 163) and patients who received SCS-consistent care (n = 117). This was also the case after adjusting for possible confounders, that is, -4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -10.3 to 1.7) and -1.9 (95% CI = -7.0 to 3.1), respectively. Furthermore, no differences were found in changes over time between groups in self-efficacy and pain coping. Conclusion The results raised several important issues that need to be considered regarding the value of the SCS, such as the reasons that GPs provide SCS-inconsistent care, the long-term effects of the SCS, and the effects on costs and side effects.
    British Journal of General Practice 09/2014; 64(626):e538-44. DOI:10.3399/bjgp14X681337 · 2.36 Impact Factor