Article

Impact of Admission Glycemic Variability, Glucose, and Glycosylated Hemoglobin on Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Diabetes care (Impact Factor: 8.57). 01/2013; 36(4). DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0925
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE
Dysglycemia is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Whether admission glycemic variability (GV) has important value in prognosis of AMI patients is still unknown. The aim of study is to investigate the prognostic value of admission GV, glucose, and glycosylated HbA(1c) in AMI patients.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We measured blood glucose, HbA(1c), and GV on admission in 222 consecutive patients with diagnosed AMI. GV, indicated as the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), was determined by a continuous glucose-monitoring system. MAGE was categorized as ≥3.9 or <3.9 mmol/L; admission glucose as ≥8.61 or <8.61 mmol/L; and HbA(1c) as ≥6.5 or <6.5%. Participants were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The relationship of admission MAGE, glucose, and HbA(1c) to the major adverse cardiac event (MACE) of AMI patients was analyzed.RESULTSIn 222 enrolled patients with AMI, the rate of MACE by MAGE category (<3.9 or ≥3.9 mmol/L) was 8.4 and 24.1%, respectively (P = 0.001), by admission glucose category (<8.61 or ≥8.61 mmol/L) was 10.1 and 21.6%, respectively (P = 0.020), and by HbA(1c) category (<6.5 vs. ≥6.5%) was 10.7 versus 18.7%, respectively (P = 0.091). In multivariate analysis, high MAGE level was significantly associated with incidence of MACE (hazard ratio 2.419 [95% CI 1.273-9.100]; P = 0.017) even after adjusting for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score, but admission glucose and HbA(1c) was not.CONCLUSIONS
Elevated admission glycemic variability appears more important than admission glucose and prior long-term abnormal glycometabolic status in predicting 1-year MACE in patients with AMI.

0 Followers
 · 
71 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The benchmark for assessing quality of long-term glycemic control and adjustment of therapy is currently glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Despite its importance as an indicator for the development of diabetic complications, recent studies have revealed that this metric has some limitations; it conveys a rather complex message, which has to be taken into consideration for diabetes screening and treatment. On the basis of recent clinical trials, the relationship between HbA1c and cardiovascular outcomes in long-standing diabetes has been called into question. It becomes obvious that other surrogate and biomarkers are needed to better predict cardiovascular diabetes complications and assess efficiency of therapy. Glycated albumin, fructosamin, and 1,5-anhydroglucitol have received growing interest as alternative markers of glycemic control. In addition to measures of hyperglycemia, advanced glucose monitoring methods became available. An indispensible adjunct to HbA1c in routine diabetes care is self-monitoring of blood glucose. This monitoring method is now widely used, as it provides immediate feedback to patients on short-term changes, involving fasting, preprandial, and postprandial glucose levels. Beyond the traditional metrics, glycemic variability has been identified as a predictor of hypoglycemia, and it might also be implicated in the pathogenesis of vascular diabetes complications. Assessment of glycemic variability is thus important, but exact quantification requires frequently sampled glucose measurements. In order to optimize diabetes treatment, there is a need for both key metrics of glycemic control on a day-to-day basis and for more advanced, user-friendly monitoring methods. In addition to traditional discontinuous glucose testing, continuous glucose sensing has become a useful tool to reveal insufficient glycemic management. This new technology is particularly effective in patients with complicated diabetes and provides the opportunity to characterize glucose dynamics. Several continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, which have shown usefulness in clinical practice, are presently on the market. They can broadly be divided into systems providing retrospective or real-time information on glucose patterns. The widespread clinical application of CGM is still hampered by the lack of generally accepted measures for assessment of glucose profiles and standardized reporting of glucose data. In this article, we will discuss advantages and limitations of various metrics for glycemic control as well as possibilities for evaluation of glucose data with the special focus on glycemic variability and application of CGM to improve individual diabetes management.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) has been widely recognized as a marker for predicting the severity of diabetes mellitus (DM) and several cardiovascular diseases. However, whether HbA1c could predict the severity and clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains largely unknown. We determine relationship of HbA1c with severity and outcome in patients with stable CAD.
    Lipids in Health and Disease 05/2014; 13(1):89. DOI:10.1186/1476-511X-13-89 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main aim in the management of diabetes mellitus is to prevent the development of its complications. Large fluctuations in glucose levels may increase the risk of complications, so improved control of glucose fluctuations, in addition to management of chronic hyperglycemia, could represent an important goal in diabetes pharmacotherapy. Pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that poor control of blood glucose fluctuations contributes to progression of diabetic vascular complications. Dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors are one of several drug classes used to manage diabetes, and the potential vasoprotective effects of DPP-4 inhibition have attracted attention in recent years. The DPP-4 inhibitor teneligliptin was approved in Japan in 2012 and in Korea in 2014. Teneligliptin differs in its structural and pharmacokinetic characteristics compared with other drugs in the same class. It appears to have potent, sustained effects on glycemic control, thereby reducing the complications of hypoglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia. Because of its effects on vascular function, teneligliptin may be beneficial in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease. The possible pleiotropic effects of teneligliptin, such as those on endothelial function and metabolic syndrome, are of great interest. This review examines these effects and their potential clinical relevance.
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 02/2015; 16(3):417-26. DOI:10.1517/14656566.2015.1000301 · 3.09 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from