Changing work values in the United States, 1973-2006

Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States. Electronic address: .
Social Science Research (Impact Factor: 1.27). 03/2013; 42(2):255-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.012
Source: PubMed


This article examines changes in workers' work values for the period 1973-2006 using General Social Survey data. We assess the relative importance that workers assign to high income, as opposed to security, advancement, short hours and "importance and sense of accomplishment." The latter ranked highest throughout this period, but the relative priority placed on income and job security generally increased. We suggest that the rising relative rankings of earnings and job security reflect growing job, employability, and economic insecurity that workers generally experienced during this period, making these job characteristics generally more difficult to attain. Groups most vulnerable to job, employability, and economic insecurity-such as less educated workers and blacks-were most apt to place high importance on income and security. Differences in rankings between men and women, blacks and nonblacks, and college and high school graduates remained fairly stable over this period.

26 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper aims to contribute to the development of a broader, more balanced approach to talent management that will help in studying and implementing talent management across different contexts. The paper starts with an overview of the advances made in previous reviews and studies with respect to three central themes: the definition of talent, intended outcomes of talent management, and talent management practices. We identify the one-dimensional and narrow approach to the topic as a main limitation of the existing talent management literature. Through the use of theories from the organizational theory and the strategic HRM domain, we add new perspectives and develop a multilevel, multi-value approach to talent management. In so doing, we offer an in-depth discussion of the potential economic and non-economic value created by talent management at the individual, organizational, and societal level.
    Human Resource Management Review 12/2013; 23(4):326–336. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.05.004 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This manuscript reports a cross-cultural study examining four antecedents (average salary, past promotion, organizational constraints, and collectivistic values) of person–organization (P–O), demands–abilities (D–A), and needs–supplies (N–S) perceptions of fit. We draw on both the fundamental motivations framework and research on cross-cultural differences to outline antecedent–fit relationships that are universal and culture-specific. The universal antecedent–fit relationships include the associations between past promotion and D–A fit perceptions and organizational constraints and N–S fit perceptions. Two culture-specific antecedent–fit relationships were hypothesized. Salary was found to be more strongly related to N–S fit perceptions in Russia and China than in the U.S. Contrary to our predictions, however, the link between collectivistic values and P–O fit was stronger in the U.S. than in China. We conclude with implications for cross-cultural fit research and human resource management practices in multi-national organizations.
    European Management Journal 04/2014; 32(6). DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.005 · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how work and family aspirations relate to occupational achievements and gender differences herein. Design/methodology/approach – Using data from 2009 the authors examined the relationship between career and childrearing aspirations and occupational achievements of Dutch parents. Using path modeling in Mplus, the authors investigated both direct and indirect pathways where aspirations were related to occupational achievements via time allocations. Findings – The authors found that ranking being promoted instead of a non-career aspiration as the most important job aspiration was positively related to occupational achievements. Surprisingly, the authors also found that ranking childrearing as the most important life role aspiration was positively related to earnings among fathers. Research limitations/implications – Investigating aspirations in multiple domains simultaneously can provide new information on working parents’ occupational achievements. Practical implications – The results imply that parents who want to achieve an authority position or high earnings may need to prioritize their promotion aspiration among their job aspirations in order to increase the likelihood of achieving such a position. Moreover, this is likely to require sacrifices outside the work domain, since spending more time on paid work is an important way to achieve this aspiration. Originality/value – This paper adds to previous research by explicitly taking life role aspirations into account instead of focussing solely on job aspirations. Moreover, this study extends previous research by investigating indirect pathways from aspirations to occupational achievements via family work in addition to the previously found pathway via paid work.
    Career Development International 08/2014; 19(4):447-468. DOI:10.1108/CDI-12-2012-0128 · 1.29 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications