Routine HIV testing among providers of HIV care in the United States, 2009

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 01/2013; 8(1):e51231. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051231
Source: PubMed


In 2006, CDC recommended HIV screening as part of routine medical care for all persons aged 13–64 years. We examined adherence to the recommendations among a sample of HIV care providers in the US to determine if known providers of HIV care are offering routine HIV testing in outpatient settings.
Data were from the CDC's Medical Monitoring Project Provider Survey, administered to physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants from June-September 2009. We assessed bivariate associations between testing behaviors and provider and practice characteristics and used multivariate regression to determine factors associated with offering HIV screening to all patients aged 13–64 years.
Sixty percent of providers reported offering HIV screening to all patients 13 to 64 years of age. Being a nurse practitioner (aOR = 5.6, 95% CI = 2.6–11.9) compared to physician, age<39 (aOR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.0–3.5) or 39–49 (aOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4–3.3) compared with ≥50 years, and black race (aOR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.2–6.0) compared with white race was associated with offering testing to all patients. Providers with low (aOR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.1–0.3) or medium (aOR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2–0.6) HIV-infected patient loads were less likely to offer HIV testing to all patients compared with providers with high patient loads.
Many providers of HIV care are still conducting risk-based rather than routine testing. We found that provider profession, age, race, and HIV-infected patient load were associated with offering HIV testing. Health care providers should use patient encounters as an opportunity to offer routine HIV testing to patients as outlined in CDC's revised recommendations for HIV testing in health care settings.

Download full-text


Available from: Patrick Sullivan, Mar 05, 2014
22 Reads
  • Source
    • "This could be due to lack of self-perceived risk or stigma, but it could also be that they had never been offered HIV testing from a health-care professional. A recent study in the United States found that although CDC’s recommendations for universal HIV screening have been in place since 2006, only 60% of health-providers are actually conducting routine HIV testing [51]. Universal offering of HIV testing to inpatients could represent an important opportunity to normalize HIV testing, identify individuals with undiagnosed HIV infection at an earlier stage of disease, and promptly link them to care. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Argentinean AIDS Program estimates that 110,000 persons are living with HIV/AIDS in Argentina. Of those, approximately 40% are unaware of their status, and 30% are diagnosed in advanced stages of immunosuppression. Though studies show that universal HIV screening is cost-effective in settings with HIV prevalence greater than 0.1%, in Argentina, with the exception of antenatal care, HIV testing is always client-initiated. We performed a pilot study to assess the acceptability of a universal HIV screening program among inpatients of an urban public hospital in Buenos Aires. Over a six-month period, all eligible adult patients admitted to the internal medicine ward were offered HIV testing. Demographics, uptake rates, reasons for refusal and new HIV diagnoses were analyzed. Of the 350 admissions during this period, 249 were eligible and subsequently enrolled. The enrolled population was relatively old compared to the general population, was balanced on gender, and did not report traditional high risk factors for HIV infection. Only 88 (39%) reported prior HIV testing. One hundred and ninety (76%) patients accepted HIV testing. In multivariable analysis only younger age (OR 1.02; 95%CI 1.003-1.05) was independently associated with test uptake. Three new HIV diagnoses were made (undiagnosed HIV prevalence: 1.58%); none belonged to a most-at-risk population. Our findings suggest that universal HIV screening in this setting is acceptable and potentially effective in identifying undiagnosed HIV-infected individuals. If confirmed in a larger study, our findings may inform changes in the Argentinean HIV testing policy.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e69517. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069517 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended routinely testing patients (aged 13-64) for HIV since 2006. However, many physicians do not routinely test. From January 2011 to March 2012, we conducted 18 in-depth individual interviews and explored primary care physicians' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementing routine HIV testing in North Carolina. Physicians' comments were categorized thematically and fell into 5 groups: policy, community, practice, physician, and patient. Lack of universal reimbursement was identified as the major policy barrier. Participants believed endorsement from the United States Preventive Services Tasks Force would facilitate adoption of routine HIV testing policies. Physicians reported HIV/AIDS stigma, socially conservative communities, lack of confidentiality, and rural geography as community barriers. Physicians believed public HIV testing campaigns would legitimize testing and decrease stigma in communities. Physicians cited time constraints and competing clinical priorities as physician barriers that could be overcome by delegating testing to nursing staff. HIV test refusal, low HIV risk perception, and stigma emerged as patient barriers. Physicians recommended adoption of routine HIV testing for all patients to facilitate and destigmatize testing. Physicians continue to experience a variety of barriers when implementing routine HIV testing in primary care settings. Our findings support multilevel approaches to enhance physician routine HIV testing in primary care settings.
    Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care 03/2014; 14(2). DOI:10.1177/2325957414524025
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Preventive care services and risk-reduction counseling are routinely offered to HIV patients during their routine clinic visits. However, assessment of clinicians’ performance on these practices has been difficult because of the use of many single indicators. This study attempts to evaluate the relationships between empirically-derived composite measures of preventive care counseling practices by HIV medical care providers (HMCP) in outpatient clinical care settings. Methods: Data used in this study were obtained from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention Medical Monitoring Project HMCP’ survey conducted in Houston/Harris County, Texas between June and September of 2009. Six domain-specific composite preventive care counseling indices developed were subjected to descriptive and correlation analyses. Results: All preventive care counseling indices developed produced significant (P ≤ 0.05) Cronbach’s alpha coefficients that ranged from 0.64 to 0.91. The overall prevention counseling index was significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with all the domain specific indices across patient status (r = 0.67-0.89). There were greater correlations between risk-reduction index (RRi) and disease screening index (DSi), mental health, and substance use index (MSi) and social and family support index in established patients (r = 0.55-0.73, P ≤ 0.01) compared to those in newly-diagnosed patients (r = 0.44-0.56, P ≤ 0.05). Although medication and adherence index was significantly associated with RRi (r = 0.50, P < 0.001) and DSi (r = 0.46, P < 0.001) in the sample population, these associations, disappeared (P > 0.05) during by-group analysis based on patient status. Conclusions: Understanding the magnitude, direction, and probability of relationships between the preventive care counseling indices may help with providers’ self-assessment and prioritization of efforts in areas that will produce better health outcomes and prevent transmission of HIV/sexually transmitted diseases.
    02/2015; 4(1):14-21. DOI:10.5455/jbh.20150125020541