Clinical Review: Modified 5 As: Minimal intervention for obesity counseling in primary care.

Dalhousie University, Family Medicine, Suite 4060, Lane Bldg, 5909 Veteran's Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS B3H 2E2. .
Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien (Impact Factor: 1.4). 01/2013; 59(1):27-31.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To adapt the 5 As model in order to provide primary care practitioners with a framework for obesity counseling.
A systematic literature search of MEDLINE using the search terms 5 A's (49 articles retrieved, all relevant) and 5 A's and primary care (8 articles retrieved, all redundant) was conducted. The National Institute of Health and the World Health Organization websites were also searched.
The 5 As (ask, assess, advise, agree, and assist), developed for smoking cessation, can be adapted for obesity counseling. Ask permission to discuss weight; be nonjudgmental and explore the patient's readiness for change. Assess body mass index, waist circumference, and obesity stage; explore drivers and complications of excess weight. Advise the patient about the health risks of obesity, the benefits of modest weight loss, the need for a long-term strategy, and treatment options. Agree on realistic weight-loss expectations, targets, behavioural changes, and specific details of the treatment plan. Assist in identifying and addressing barriers; provide resources, assist in finding and consulting with appropriate providers, and arrange regular follow-up.
The 5 As comprise a manageable evidence-based behavioural intervention strategy that has the potential to improve the success of weight management within primary care.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Vallis, Dec 18, 2013
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Odontomas are the most common odontogenic tumours. They are considered as hamartomas - a local tissue malformation without autonomous growth potential - and are non-neoplastic. Clinically and histopathologically, compound and complex odontomas can be differentiated. Compound odontomas consist of a varying number of tooth-like structures and histology show dental tissues in an orderly pattern. Most often compound odontomas are diagnosed in young patients in the anterior maxilla. Patients are rarely complaining of symptoms and they are usually diagnosed during routine radiographic examinations or due to late eruption of permanent or persistence of deciduous teeth. The following case report presents a disturbed eruption of a lateral right incisor of the maxilla in a 8-year old female patient. Clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics of this lesion will be discussed as well as therapy and follow-up.
    Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia / SSO 01/2012; 122(12):1147-60.
  • Source
    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien 04/2013; 59(4):353. · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Primary care provides most of the evidence-based chronic disease prevention and screening services offered by the healthcare system. However, there remains a gap between recommended preventive services and actual practice. This trial (the BETTER Trial) aimed to improve preventive care of heart disease, diabetes, colorectal, breast and cervical cancers, and relevant lifestyle factors through a practice facilitation intervention set in primary care. Pragmatic two-way factorial cluster RCT with Primary Care Physicians' practices as the unit of allocation and individual patients as the unit of analysis. The setting was urban Primary Care Team practices in two Canadian provinces. Eight Primary Care Team practices were randomly assigned to receive the practice-level intervention or wait-list control; 4 physicians in each team (32 physicians) were randomly assigned to receive the patient-level intervention or wait-list control. Patients randomly selected from physicians' rosters were stratified into two groups: 1) general and 2) moderate mental illness. The interventions involved a multifaceted, evidence-based, tailored practice-level intervention with a Practice Facilitator, and a patient-level intervention involving a one-hour visit with a Prevention Practitioner where patients received a tailored 'prevention prescription'. The primary outcome was a composite Summary Quality Index of 28 evidence-based chronic disease prevention and screening actions with pre-defined targets, expressed as the ratio of eligible actions at baseline that were met at follow-up. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted. 789 of 1,260 (63%) eligible patients participated. On average, patients were eligible for 8.96 (SD 3.2) actions at baseline. In the adjusted analysis, control patients met 23.1% (95% CI: 19.2% to 27.1%) of target actions, compared to 28.5% (95% CI: 20.9% to 36.0%) receiving the practice-level intervention, 55.6% (95% CI: 49.0% to 62.1%) receiving the patient-level intervention, and 58.9% (95% CI: 54.7% to 63.1%) receiving both practice- and patient-level interventions (patient-level intervention versus control, P < 0.001). The benefit of the patient-level intervention was seen in both strata. The extra cost of the intervention was $26.43CAN (95% CI: $16 to $44) per additional action met. A Prevention Practitioner, can improve the implementation of clinically important prevention and screening for chronic diseases in a cost-effective manner.
    BMC Family Practice 11/2013; 14(1):175. DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-14-175 · 1.74 Impact Factor