Some psychological aspects of reduced consumption behavior: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation

Environment and Behavior (Impact Factor: 1.27). 05/1996; 28:358. DOI: 10.1177/0013916596283005

ABSTRACT Efforts to promote environmentally appropriate behavior rely on motivation originating from 3 sources: other people, the environment, and one's self. This article examines a particular form of the latter source, intrinsic satisfactions. Nine studies are presented that investigate the multidimensional structure of intrinsic satisfactions and their relationship to reduced consumption behavior. Two categories of intrinsic satisfaction, labeled frugality and participation, are particularly well suited to encouraging such behavior. A third category, competence motivation, is explored in some detail and its dimensional structure is interpreted in terms of 3 dominant themes in the research literature. Connections between intrinsic satisfactions and such concepts as locus of control and altruism are explored, and implications for practitioners are discussed.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study made a comparison of pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations between household and hotel settings. Results of a survey research among 1185 participants showed a behavioral inconsistency between the two settings – participants reported a significantly higher level of pro-environmental behavior in a household setting. Furthermore, the study revealed that while normative motives are the dominant determinant of pro-environmental behavior in a household setting, hedonic motives are the strongest predictor of such behavior in a hotel setting. Theoretical and managerial implications of the inconsistencies in pro-environmental behavior and underlying motivations between the two settings are discussed.
    International Journal of Hospitality Management 03/2013; 32:102-112. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.008 · 1.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Focus on Risk is an instructional material created to enhance high school students' environmental risk literacy. An evaluation involving 532 Focus on Risk students and 305 comparison students showed modest improvements in students' demonstrated risk knowledge and stronger improvements in self-assessed risk knowledge. Students' sense of responsibility for and perception of control over managing risks did not change. Teachers reported that Focus on Risk provided a valuable learning experience for students. Recommendations suggest the need for (a) a framework to help youth make environmental risk decisions, (b) using familiar risks to introduce abstract concepts and initiate student interest, and (c) training interdisciplinary groups of teachers to coordinate risk education activities.
    The Journal of Environmental Education 01/2005; 36(2):3-13. DOI:10.3200/JOEE.36.2.3-13 · 0.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The study tested whether proenvironmental behavioral intention mediates the relationship between place attachment and place satisfaction among visitors of the Dandenong Ranges National Park in Australia. Structural equation modeling was employed on a sample of 452 visitors. Regression models were estimated to test the mediating effect of proenvironmental behavioral intentions on the relationships between place dependence, place identity, place affect, place social bonding, and place satisfaction. Results show that as hypothesized, these effects were mediated by proenvironmental behavioral intentions, except for the relationship between place social bonding and place satisfaction. An important theoretical contribution is the mediating role of proenvironmental behavioral intentions in nature-based settings. Practical applications of the study include marketing aimed at encouraging repeat visitation by increasing levels of place attachment and place satisfaction in national parks through proenvironmental message development and delivery.
    Tourism Analysis 12/2014; 19(6). DOI:10.3727/108354214X14146846679286