How does political instability affect economic growth?

European Journal of Political Economy (Impact Factor: 1.44). 03/2013; 29(1):151-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2012.11.001
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to empirically determine the effects of political instability on economic growth. By using the system-GMM estimator for linear dynamic panel data models on a sample covering up to 169 countries, and 5-year periods from 1960 to 2004, we find that higher degrees of political instability are associated with lower growth rates of GDP per capita. Regarding the channels of transmission, we find that political instability adversely affects growth by lowering the rates of productivity growth and, to a smaller degree, physical and human capital accumulation. Finally, economic freedom and ethnic homogeneity are beneficial to growth, while democracy may have a small negative effect.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper identifies the fiscal instruments that governments can use to promote economic growth when sociopolitical instability (SPI) is present. We show that fiscal policy that takes into account income distribution and SPI transforms a neoclassical growth model into one with both endogenous growth and a poverty trap. Under these circumstances, the growth rate of the economy depends upon SPI, fiscal policy and income distribution. The baseline level of SPI determines an economy’s ability to grow. If SPI is high, the economy remains in a poverty trap even if fiscal policy instruments are set appropriately.
    European Journal of Political Economy 06/2014; · 1.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper investigates the determinants of the volatility of fiscal policy discretion. Using a linear dynamic panel data model for 113 countries from 1980 to 2006 and a system-GMM estimator, we find that an increase in the number of episodes of government crisis, less democracy and presidentialist systems raise the volatility of the discretionary component of fiscal policy. Additionally, we show that countries with larger populations and less flexible exchange rate systems are more insured against uncertainty about the conduct of fiscal policy. Our results are robust to various regional dummy variables, different subsets of countries and the presence of high inflation and crisis episodes.
    Fiscal Studies 03/2014; 35(1). · 0.49 Impact Factor

Full-text (5 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014