Introduction: The use of clinical laboratory test results in diagnostic decision making is an integral part of clinical medicine. The laboratory requisition form is the major communication link between clinician and laboratory personnel. Insufficient, incorrect or illegible information on the requisition forms can directly affect processing and analysis of the specimens. It may lead to incorrect diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, misinterpretation of result, and impair on meaningful comments from the clinical laboratory.Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the pre-analytical error with inadequacies in the completion of laboratory requisition forms. Materials and Methods: Original laboratory requisition forms received at the department of clinical biochemistry during a four month period were manually scrutinized for the presence of prefixed criteria. These data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software and represented as percentage. Results: During the study period, 5600 requisition forms were examined. The most inadequately fi lled parameter was regarding the specimen information, treatment information, clinical information, which was missing in almost entire forms. The relevant clinical note was stated in 74.6% of the forms. Patient's information was relatively well fi lled. Conclusion: This study recognized the inadequacies in laboratory requisition form during the pre-analytical phase of the laboratory testing process. Thus, highlights the needs to enforce and implement policies that would possibly enhance compliance with the requirements of laboratory requisition form completion.

Download full-text


Available from: Prabin Gyawali, Oct 07, 2015
457 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Application of Total Quality Management concepts to laboratory testing requires that the total process, including preanalytical and postanalytical phases, be managed so as to reduce or, ideally, eliminate all defects within the process itself. Indeed a "mistake" can be defined as any defect during the entire testing process, from ordering tests to reporting results. We evaluated the frequency and types of mistakes found in the "stat" section of the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the University-Hospital of Padova by monitoring four different departments (internal medicine, nephrology, surgery, and intensive care unit) for 3 months. Among a total of 40490 analyses, we identified 189 laboratory mistakes, a relative frequency of 0.47%. The distribution of mistakes was: preanalytical 68.2%, analytical 13.3%, and postanalytical 18.5%. Most of the laboratory mistakes (74%) did not affect patients' outcome. However, in 37 patients (19%), laboratory mistakes were associated with further inappropriate investigations, thus resulting in an unjustifiable increase in costs. Moreover, in 12 patients (6.4%) laboratory mistakes were associated with inappropriate care or inappropriate modification of therapy. The promotion of quality control and continuous improvement of the total testing process, including pre- and postanalytical phases, seems to be a prerequisite for an effective laboratory service.
    Clinical Chemistry 09/1997; 43(8 Pt 1):1348-51. · 7.91 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Laboratory testing is a highly complex process and, although laboratory services are relatively safe, they are not as safe as they could or should be. Clinical laboratories have long focused their attention on quality control methods and quality assessment programs dealing with analytical aspects of testing. However, a growing body of evidence accumulated in recent decades demonstrates that quality in clinical laboratories cannot be assured by merely focusing on purely analytical aspects. The more recent surveys on errors in laboratory medicine conclude that in the delivery of laboratory testing, mistakes occur more frequently before (pre-analytical) and after (post-analytical) the test has been performed. Most errors are due to pre-analytical factors (46-68.2% of total errors), while a high error rate (18.5-47% of total errors) has also been found in the post-analytical phase. Errors due to analytical problems have been significantly reduced over time, but there is evidence that, particularly for immunoassays, interference may have a serious impact on patients. A description of the most frequent and risky pre-, intra- and post-analytical errors and advice on practical steps for measuring and reducing the risk of errors is therefore given in the present paper. Many mistakes in the Total Testing Process are called "laboratory errors", although these may be due to poor communication, action taken by others involved in the testing process (e.g., physicians, nurses and phlebotomists), or poorly designed processes, all of which are beyond the laboratory's control. Likewise, there is evidence that laboratory information is only partially utilized. A recent document from the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) recommends a new, broader definition of the term "laboratory error" and a classification of errors according to different criteria. In a modern approach to total quality, centered on patients' needs and satisfaction, the risk of errors and mistakes in pre- and post-examination steps must be minimized to guarantee the total quality of laboratory services.
    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 02/2006; 44(6):750-9. DOI:10.1515/CCLM.2006.123 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various publications have highlighted the significance of laboratory errors in the pre- and post-analytical phases and their impact on results. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is a first-line thyroid function test and, if abnormal, reflex thyroxine (T4) or tri-iodothyronine (T3) testing is requested, depending on clinical and medication data provided. Interpretative comments are added to all TFT results. In view of the paucity of articles describing such errors, we audited laboratory request forms requesting thyroid function tests (TFT), received from primary care clinics and regional hospitals at our laboratory. We assessed 482 laboratory request forms for TFT from primary health care clinics for specific parameters. A total of 482 forms were analysed. Medication/s used by the patient (74.5%) and doctor's contact number (65.1%) were the most commonly incomplete parameters. Of the 123 patients with medication details, 62 (50.4%) were on thyroxine. There are few studies examining the frequency and impact of incomplete laboratory forms on laboratory errors, and even fewer studies examining interpretative comments accompanying clinical biochemistry results. We studied how pre-analytical errors in completing request forms may lead to incorrect interpretative comments and inappropriate reflex testing, and so influence the quality of the post-analytical phase.
    South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde 09/2009; 99(9):668-71. · 1.63 Impact Factor
Show more