Visible Choice Sets And Scope Sensitivity In Contingent Values

American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association), 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 01/2001;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Through a combination of experimental and field analysis, we demonstrate that varying the visible choice set (i.e., set of goods which, at any given point in a valuation exercise, the respondent perceives as being the full extent of purchase options which will be made available in the course of that exercise) strongly affects observed scope. These results challenge the conclusion that contingent values are plagued by embedding and ordering effects, suggesting that such effects can be eliminated when the respondent is completely informed about the entirety of valuation tasks prior to answering the first elicitation question.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A theoretical framework for understanding substitution and complementary effects between environmental programs is derived. A multiple program valuation function is specified and its structure analyzed. A maximum likelihood estimator is derived to estimate the parameters of the valuation function using referendum-type, contingent valuation data. The empirical analysis shows that the conventional benefit aggregation approach of independent valuation and summation overstates the benefits of two- and three-program policies by an average of 24 and 54%, respectively.
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 02/1993; 25(1):56-75. · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reports the results of two studies aimed at testing and refining a procedure for estimating willingness-to-pay based monetary values of safety using the contingent valuation method. In spite of the fact that respondents were given the opportunity to discuss various safety issues and key concepts in focus group meetings held in advance of individual interviews, and were also given ample opportunity to revise their responses in the light of the overall pattern of these responses, the results show clear evidence of extensive and persistent insensitivity to the scale and scope of the safety improvements that were specified in the contingent valuation questions, as well as vulnerability to framing effects. This clearly casts serious doubt on the reliability and validity of willingness-to-pay based monetary values of safety estimated using conventional contingent valuation procedures. Copyright 1998 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 02/1998; 17(1):5-25. · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: How to conduct a proper contingent valuation study. Reccomendations
    01/1993; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014