[The impact of antibiotic treatment in patients with influenza-like illness].

Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases 08/2008; 31(7):483-7.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To study the etiology of influenza-like illness (ILI) in Beijing, and to investigate the impact of antibiotic treatment on outcomes.
This was a prospective cohort study. Patients with diagnosis of influenza-like illness were prospectively enrolled for study of bacterial and viral pathogens. Demographic characteristics, underlying diseases, respiratory and extrapulmonary symptoms, laboratory tests were also collected for analysis of relationship between drug therapy and outcomes.
A total of 476 cases were enrolled between Dec. 2006 and Apr. 2007, of whom 454 cases were used for analysis. Influenza virus was the most common pathogen( n = 197, 43.4%), with other pathogens rarely seen. The mean age of the patients was (33 +/- 13) years, and the ratio of male to female was 1.1:1. Twenty four patients (5.3% ) received influenza vaccine. The rate of antibiotic prescription after onset of illness was 63.4%, but none received antiviral drugs such as Oseltamivir and amantadine. Compared with influenza-negative patients, patients with influenza were older, had more underlying diseases and had greater severity of symptoms such as cough, sore throat, headache and myalgia (but with no statistical differences). The influenza syndrome (T > or = 39 degrees C plus cough, sore throat and headache or myalgia) was more common in the influenza group compared to the influenza-negative patients (P < 0.05). The ratio of antibiotic prescription was 67% in the influenza group, and the total white blood cell and platelet count, percentage of neutrophils were higher in antibiotic treatment patients compared with non-antibiotic treatment patients (P < 0.01). The cost in patients who received antibiotics was twice as much as non-antibiotic treatment patients (P < 0.05), but the defervescence time and respiratory symptom alleviation time did not differ. Cox regression analysis showed that the total white blood count and the differentials (OR value 1.049 and 1.014, respectively), but not antibiotic use were the independent risk factors for longer defervescence time.
Influenza virus was the most common pathogen for adult patients with ILI in Beijing city during the winter and the spring seasons. Antibiotic treatment of adult patients with ILI did not improve illness resolution, while the cost was increased significantly.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are limited data evaluating the relationship between influenza treatment and hospitalization duration. Our purpose assessed the association between different treatments and hospital stay among Korean pediatric influenza patients. Total 770 children ≤ 15 yr-of-age hospitalized with community-acquired laboratory-confirmed influenza at three large urban tertiary care hospitals were identified through a retrospective medical chart review. Demographic, clinical, and cost data were extracted and a multivariable linear regression model was used to assess the associations between influenza treatment types and hospital stay. Overall, there were 81% of the patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed influenza who received antibiotic monotherapy whereas only 4% of the patients received oseltamivir monotherapy. The mean treatment-related charges for hospitalizations treated with antibiotics, alone or with oseltamivir, were significantly higher than those treated with oseltamivir-only (P < 0.001). Influenza patients treated with antibiotics-only and antibiotics/oseltamivir combination therapy showed 44.9% and 28.2%, respectively, longer duration of hospitalization compared to those treated with oseltamivir-only. Patients treated with antibiotics, alone or combined with oseltamivir, were associated with longer hospitalization and significantly higher medical charges, compared to patients treated with oseltamivir alone. In Korea, there is a need for more judicious use of antibiotics, appropriate use of influenza rapid testing.
    Journal of Korean medical science 04/2014; 29(4):485-93. · 0.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since May 2009, exposure of the population of Beijing, China to pH1N1 has resulted in an increase in respiratory illnesses. Limited information is available on the etiology and clinical characteristics of the influenza-like illness (ILI) that ensued in adults following the pH1N1 pandemic. Clinical and epidemiological data of ILI in adults was collected. A total of 279 throat swabs were tested for twelve respiratory viruses using multiplex RT-PCR. Clinical characteristics of influenza A in outpatients versus test-negative patients were compared using Pearson's χ2 and the Mann-Whitney U test. 190 swabs were tested for pH1N1 by virus isolation. Consultation rates for ILI were compared between 2009 and 2010. One or two virus were detected in 29% of the samples. Influenza A virus (FLU-A) accounted for 22.9% (64/279). Other viruses were present at a frequency less than 3.0%. Cough was significantly associated with Influenza A virus infection (χ2, p<0.001). The positive rate of FLU-A was consistent with changes in the ILI rate during the same period and there was a significant reduction in the incidence of ILI in 2010 when compared to 2009. During the 2010-2011 influenza season, the incidence peaked in January 2011 in Beijing and north China. Exposure to pH1N1 had no impact on typical influenza seasonal peaks, although FLU-A remained the predominant virus for 2010 in Beijing. Symptomatically, cough was associated with FLU-A infection. The positive rate of influenza virus was consistent with changes in the ILI rate during the same period and there was a significant reduction in the incidence of ILI in 2010 when compared to that of 2009.
    PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(1):e28786. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • 01/2010;