Article

Maximal fitness testing in sedentary elderly at substantial risk of disability: LIFE-P study experience.

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Journal of aging and physical activity (Impact Factor: 1.41). 11/2008; 16(4):408-15.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The authors sought to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of maximal fitness testing in sedentary older individuals at risk for mobility disability.
Maximal cycle-ergometer testing was performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months later in a subset of LIFE-P study participants at the Cooper Institute site. The mean age of the 20 participants (80% female) tested was 74.7 +/- 3.4 years. The following criteria were used to determine whether participants achieved maximal effort: respiratory-exchange ratio (RER) >1.1, heart rate within 10 beats/min of the maximal level predicted by age, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) >17.
Participants' mean peak VO2 was 12.1 (3.7) mL . kg-1 . min-1. At baseline testing, only 20% of participants attained an RER >1.10, only 35% achieved a peak heart rate within 10 beats of their age-predicted maximum, and 18% had an RPE of >17. Subsequent testing at 6 and 12 months produced similar results.
In this pilot study of sedentary older persons at risk for mobility disability, very few participants were able to achieve maximal effort during graded cycle-ergometer testing.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Thomas Gill, Apr 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
96 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Peak oxygen pulse has been considered a surrogate of cardiovascular function and an independent predictor of all cause mortality. However, O2Ppeak depends on maximal volitional effort which may limit its utility in older subjects. The aim of this study was to develop a model to estimate O2Ppeak without exercise in an elderly sample. This cross-sectional study enrolled 67 community-dwelling older adults (69.4±7.1 years; 41 men) for the non-exercise model development and 30 community-dwelling older adults (67.7±6.4 years; n=30; 17 men) for cross-validation. The non-exercise model was derived through hierarchical regression model and cross-validated by means of PRESS statistics and comparison against an independent sample. Classification accuracy of the model for tertiles of estimated and actual O2Ppeak was tested by gamma (γ) nonparametric correlation. The following prediction equation was generated: -3.416+0.137×weight (kg)+1.226×Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) (metabolic equivalents, METs)+1.987×gender (0=women, 1=men)-2.045×β-Blockers use (0=no, 1=yes)-0.044×resting heart rate (HR) (R(2)=0.83; standard error of estimate (SEE)=1.68mLbeat(-1)). Correlation in cross-validation group was 0.80 (P<0.001). A high probability was observed for the model to rank the values in the same tertile in validation and cross-validation groups (γ=0.98; γ=0.92, respectively, P<0.05). In conclusion, O2Ppeak can be estimated with reasonable precision without exercise testing, providing an alternative for elder subjects not capable to perform maximal effort.
    Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 07/2014; 59(3). DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2014.07.009 · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low cardiorespiratory (CRF) is associated with health problems in elderly people, especially cardiovascular and metabolic disease. However, physical limitations in this population frequently preclude the application of aerobic tests. We developed a model to estimate CRF without aerobic testing in older men with chronic cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Subjects aged from 60 to 91 years were randomly assigned into validation (n = 67) and cross-validation (n = 29) groups. A hierarchical linear regression model included age, self-reported fitness, and handgrip strength normalized to body weight (R2 = 0.79; SEE = 1.1 METs). The PRESS (predicted residual sum of squares) statistics revealed minimal shrinkage in relation to the original model and that predicted by the model and actual CRF correlated well in the cross-validation group (r = 0.85). The area under curve (AUC) values suggested a good accuracy of the model to detect disability in the validation (0.876, 95% CI: 0.793–0.959) and cross-validation groups (0.826, 95% CI: 0.677–0.975). Our findings suggest that CRF can be reliably estimated without exercise test in unhealthy elderly men.
    Journal of aging research 01/2012; 2012:518045. DOI:10.1155/2012/518045
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Contemporary exercise guidelines focus on aerobic exercise conditioning that uses exercise intensities from 40% to 85% of maximal aerobic capacity for people who are at risk for cardiovascular disease. After a position statement from the American College of Sports Medicine challenged exercise practitioners to study exercise intensity, interval training began to emerge in the literature. Interval training involves having participants exercise briefly at higher exercise intensities (90%–95% of maximum oxygen consumption) followed by a period of recovery. Although the net effect of interval training is aerobic, this style of training involves periodic excursions of exercise intensity into “anaerobic” metabolism and appears to better stimulate whole-body cardiorespiratory improvements as well as cellular signaling involved in metabolism and energy flux. Recent reports demonstrate that interval training is effective in the elderly and patients with peripheral artery disease, intermittent claudication, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports 07/2009; 3(4):296-301. DOI:10.1007/s12170-009-0045-4