Article

Synthesis, anisotropy, and superconducting properties of LiFeAs single crystal

Applied Physics Letters (Impact Factor: 3.52). 05/2010; 96(21):212508-212508-3. DOI: 10.1063/1.3435472
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT A LiFeAs single crystal with Tconset ∼ 19.7 K was grown in a sealed tungsten crucible using the Bridgeman method. The electrical resistivity experiments revealed a ratio of room temperature to residual resistivity of approximately 46 and 18 for the in-plane and out-of plane directions, respectively. The estimated anisotropic resistivity, γρ = ρc/ρab, was approximately 3.3 at Tconset. The upper critical fields had large Hc2∥ab and Hc2∥c values of 83.4 T and 72.5 T, respectively, and an anisotropy ratio is γH = Hc2∥ab/Hc2∥c ∼ 1.15. The high upper critical field value and small anisotropy highlight the potential use of LiFeAs in a variety of applications. The calculated critical current density (Jc) from the M-H loop is approximately 103 A/cm2

Full-text

Available from: Yoo Jang Song, Jan 21, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
78 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The stoichiometric "111" iron-based superconductor, LiFeAs, has attacted great research interest in recent years. For the first time, we have successfully grown LiFeAs thin film by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) on SrTiO3(001) substrate, and studied the interfacial growth behavior by reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) and low-temperature scanning tunneling microscope (LT-STM). The effects of substrate temperature and Li/Fe flux ratio were investigated. Uniform LiFeAs film as thin as 3 quintuple-layer (QL) is formed. Superconducting gap appears in LiFeAs films thicker than 4 QL at 4.7 K. When the film is thicker than 13 QL, the superconducting gap determined by the distance between coherence peaks is about 7 meV, close to the value of bulk material. The ex situ transport measurement of thick LiFeAs film shows a sharp superconducting transition around 16 K. The upper critical field, Hc2(0)=13.0 T, is estimated from the temperature dependent magnetoresistance. The precise thickness and quality control of LiFeAs film paves the road of growing similar ultrathin iron arsenide films.
    EPL (Europhysics Letters) 03/2015; 109:28003. DOI:10.1209/0295-5075/109/28003 · 2.27 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The reversible magnetization curves for various magnetic fields are investigated for a single crystal of the optimally doped NaFe0.97Co0.03As superconductor with the superconducting transition temperature Tc = 20.9 K (ρ(T) = 0) in the case where H is parallel to c-axis. A well-formed rounding effect is observed in the temperature dependence of the magnetization, and it widens on increasing the strength of the applied magnetic fields. At 20.2 K, we observe a crossing of the M(T) curves for different applied magnetic fields, indicating important fluctuation effects. The irreversibility line Hirr(T) obeys a universal scaling relation Hirr(T) = H0(1 − T/Tc)n characterized by n ~ 1.537, which confirms the moderately anisotropic nature of the sample. The scaling analysis of the reversible magnetization in the region near Tc(H) supports the three-dimensional nature of the vortex fluctuations in NaFe0.97Co0.03As.
    Superconductor Science and Technology 11/2014; 27(12):125006. DOI:10.1088/0953-2048/27/12/125006 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The magneto-resistivity and electric field-current density (E-J) curves were investigated up to a magnetic field 9 T in the optimally doped single crystal with a superconducting temperature () of 24.6 K. The E-J Scaling behaviors below and above vortex glass transition temperature () were found, confirming the existence of the vortex glass phase transition. The critical exponents for the diverging spatial and time correlations at , were obtained as v = and z = , respectively. The obtained critical exponents are in good agreement with the predicted values of v ~ 1 - 2 and z > 4 within the 3D vortex glass theory.
    06/2013; 15(2). DOI:10.9714/psac.2013.15.2.016