Article

Glycemic and lipid control among patients with diabetes at six U.S. public hospitals.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (Impact Factor: 1.1). 12/2008; 19(4):1060-75. DOI: 10.1353/hpu.0.0079
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Public hospital systems share a mission to provide access to healthcare regardless of ability to pay. While public hospital systems care for large numbers of socioeconomically vulnerable and ethnically diverse populations who have diabetes, little is known about the quality of diabetes care provided in these sites.
We assessed the measurement and control of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and lipids (LDL) in a sample of patients with diabetes with > or =2 outpatient visits per year in two consecutive years at one of 6 public hospitals (N=14,222).
High proportions of patients had at least one HbA1c and LDL measurement within 2 years (89% and 88%, respectively). Thirty-five percent had HbA1c < 7.0%; 21% had HbA1c > or =9.5%; 36% had LDL<100 mg/dl; 10% had LDL>160 mg/dl. Non-White patients and patients who were never insured were most at risk for poor glycemic and lipid control.
The quality of care, as measured by glycemic and lipid monitoring and control among ongoing users of public hospital systems, was similar to that of other health systems, but disparities exist across race/ethnicity and insurance status. Because of the critical role these institutions play in providing care to the underserved, research is needed to explore factors contributing to differences in glycemic and lipid control and develop strategies to improve chronic disease management in these systems.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Charles Maynard, Dec 22, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
132 Views
  • Source
    Diabetes care 10/2009; 32(9):1746-7. DOI:10.2337/dc09-1071 · 8.57 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine longitudinal differences in glycemic control between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black veterans with type 2 diabetes. Retrospective cohort study. VA facility in the Southeastern United States. A 3-month person-period dataset was created for 8813 veterans with type 2 diabetes between June 1997 and May 2006. Primary outcome was mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over time. Secondary outcome was the odds of poor glycemic control over time (HbA1c >8%). For the primary outcome, a linear mixed model (LMM) approach was used to model the relationship of HbA1c levels and race/ethnicity over time. For the secondary outcome, generalized LMMs were used to assess whether glycemic control changed over time and whether change in glycemic control varied by racial/ethnic group. Mean age was 66.3 years, 36% were non-Hispanic black (NHB), 98% were male, 65% were married, and 50% were unemployed. Mean follow-up time was 4.4 years. Least square mean HbA1c levels from LMM adjusted for time and relevant confounders showed that NHBs had higher HbA1c values over time (mean difference of 0.54% [P < 0.001]). The final model with poor versus good glycemic control as the dependent variable, race/ethnicity as primary independent variable adjusted for time, and relevant confounders showed that NHBs were likely to have poor control compared with NHWs (OR: 1.8, 95% CI, 1.7; 2.0, P < 0.0001). NHB veterans were more likely to have higher mean HbA1c values and less likely to have good glycemic control over time compared with NHW veterans.
    Medical care 06/2010; 48(6):527-33. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d558dc · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Federal regulations require that health care organizations provide language services to patients with limited English proficiency. The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care (CLAS standards) provide guidance on how to fulfill these regulations. It is not known how US hospitals have incorporated them into practice. To assess how US hospitals are meeting federal regulations requiring provision of language services using CLAS as a measure of compliance. Cross-sectional survey. Hospital interpreter services managers (or equivalent position). Degree of meeting each of the 4 language-related CLAS standards. Many hospitals are not meeting federal regulations. The majority reported providing language assistance in a timely manner in their first, but not their third, most commonly requested language. Although hospitals reported that they informed patients of their right to receive language services, many did so only in English. A majority of hospitals reported the use of family members or untrained staff as interpreters. Few reported providing vital documents in non-English languages. Overall, 13% of hospitals met all 4 of the language-related CLAS standards, whereas 19% met none. Our study documents that many hospitals are not providing language services in a manner consistent with federal law. Enforcement of these regulations is inconsistent, and thus does not motivate hospitals to comply. Compliance will likely come with new guidelines, currently being written, by many of the regulatory organizations. Our study reinforces the importance of these efforts and helps target interventions to improve the delivery and safety of care to limited English proficient patients.
    Medical care 11/2010; 48(12):1080-7. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f380bc · 2.94 Impact Factor
Show more