Sex Differences in Hospital Risk-Adjusted Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing CABG Surgery

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Archives of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 12/2008; 168(21):2317-22; discussion 2323-5. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2317
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The primary purpose of this study was to rank US hospitals performing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery on Medicare beneficiaries into 4 performance tiers and determine if there were overall and sex-specific differences in the risk-adjusted mortality rates across performance tiers.
A retrospective analysis was done using a Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) file of all Medicare beneficiaries who underwent CABG surgery without valve repair or replacement during fiscal years 2003 and 2004. Logistic regression models controlling for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiac risk factors were used to predict the probability of in-hospital mortality. Hospitals performing at least 52 CABG surgeries during a fiscal year (at least 17 female patients) were ranked into 4 tiers. Rankings were based on the number of lives saved, calculated as the expected number of risk-adjusted deaths minus the actual number of deaths in the hospital during each fiscal year.
Average risk-adjusted mortality rate was stable and declining over the 2 years: 3.68% in 2003 and 3.61% in 2004. In 2004, the average risk-adjusted mortality rate ranged from 1.39% in tier 1 hospitals to 6.40% in tier 4 hospitals. The sex-specific mortality rate was consistently higher for women in all tiers, with the differential smallest (0.68%) in tier 1 hospitals and greatest (2.67%) in tier 4 hospitals.
The sex differential increases from top- to bottom-tier hospitals, suggesting female beneficiaries could benefit from having CABG performed at tier 1 hospitals.


Available from: Steven D Culler, Jun 09, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many previous studies have investigated the influence of gender on coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) outcomes. Despite the great volume of reports on this issue, it is still not clear whether it is the gender of the patient or pre-existing comorbid conditions that is the best predictor for the different outcomes seen between men and women. Multiple studies have shown that women are at higher risk of postoperative complications than men, particularly in the perioperative period. The goal of this study was to determine whether sex differences exist in preoperative variables between men and women, and to evaluate the effect of gender on short-term mortality and morbidity after CABG in an Iranian population. Data were collected prospectively from 690 consecutive patients (495 men and 195 women) who underwent isolated CABG. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, major complications and death were compared between the male and female patients until hospital discharge using multivariate analysis. Women were older (P = 0.020), had more diabetes (P = 0.0001), more obesity (P = 0.010), a higher New York Heart Association functional class (P = 0.030), and there was less use of arterial grafts (P = 0.016). Men had more tobacco smokers (P = 0.0001) and lower preoperative ejection fractions (EF) (P = 0.030). After surgery, women had a higher incidence of respiratory complications (P = 0.003), higher creatine kinase (CK) - MB levels (P = 0.0001), and higher inotropic support requirements (P = 0.030). They also had a higher incidence of decreased postoperative EF versus preoperative values (P = 0.020). The length of ICU stay, incidence of return to ICU and postoperative death, were similar between men and women. Nevertheless, after adjusting for age and diabetes, female gender was still independently associated with higher morbidity in patients over 50 years of age. Women had more risk factors, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Women older than 50 years of age were at a higher risk of postoperative complications than men. This difference decreased with younger age. In-hospital mortality rates were not influenced by sex, as there was no difference found between the two groups (2.5% women vs. 2.2% men; P > 0.05).
    11/2012; 1(1):17-22. DOI:10.5812/cardiovascmed.4543
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reports on sex-related outcomes in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients are conflicting. In addition, females have been underrepresented in most multicenter randomized controlled trials for mechanical circulatory support (MCS). The objective of our study was to analyze our experience implanting 130 continuous-flow LVADs and to determine the impact of sex on survival. We identified 130 patients who underwent implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD at our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups based on sex. Variables were compared using two-sided t-tests, χ tests, Cox proportional hazards models, and log-rank tests to determine whether there was a difference between the two groups and if sex was a significant independent predictor of outcome. Of the 130 patients, 35 were females and 95 were males. Female patients had worse pre-LVAD cardiac output and cardiac index and were more likely to be on MCS at the time of implantation. Male patients had worse renal function. Survival was analogous for both cohorts with 30 day, 6 month, 1 year, and 2 year survivals of 97%, 90.8%, 90.8%, and 84.3%, respectively, for female patients versus 94.7%, 87.9%, 78.4%, and 72.8%, respectively, for male patients. The incidence of other LVAD-related complications was also similar in both groups. Gender did not predict postoperative mortality on univariate analysis. Contrary to most published reports, female and male LVAD patients have similar postoperative and midterm survival, length of hospital stay, readmission rates, and postoperative complications. It appears that females have gained more benefit from newer generation devices compared to males.
    ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs: 1992) 03/2014; 60(2):199-206. DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000000048 · 1.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES: This study examines the hypothesis that a past history of heart interventions will moderate the relationship between psychosocial factors (stressful life events, social support, perceived stress, having a current partner, having a past diagnosis of depression or anxiety over the past 3 years, time pressure, education level, and the mental health index) and the presence of chest pain in a sample of older women. DESIGN: Longitudinal survey over a 3-year period. METHODS: The sample was taken from a prospective cohort study of 10,432 women initially aged between 70 and 75 years, who were surveyed in 1996 and then again in 1999. Two groups of women were identified: those reporting to have heart disease but no past history of heart interventions (i.e., coronary artery bypass graft/angioplasty) and those reporting to have heart disease with a past history of heart interventions. RESULTS: Binary logistic regression analysis was used to show that for the women with self-reported coronary heart disease but without a past history of heart intervention, feelings of time pressure as well as the number of stressful life events experienced in the 12 months prior to 1996 were independent risk factors for the presence of chest pain, even after accounting for a range of traditional risk factors. In comparison, for the women with self-reported coronary heart disease who did report a past history of heart interventions, a diagnosis of depression in the previous 3 years was the significant independent risk factor for chest pain even after accounting for traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that it is important to consider a history of heart interventions as a moderator of the associations between psychosocial variables and the frequency of chest pain in older women. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? Psychological factors have been shown to be independent predictors of a range of health outcomes in individuals with coronary heart disease, including the presence of chest pain. Most research has been conducted with men or with small samples of women; however, the evidence does suggest that these relationships exist in women as well as in men. What does this study add? Most studies have looked at overall relationships between psychological variables and health outcomes. The few studies that have looked at moderators have mainly examined gender as a moderator. To our knowledge, this is the first published study to examine a history of heart interventions as a moderator of the relationship between psychological variables and the presence of chest pain.
    British Journal of Health Psychology 12/2012; 18(4). DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12011 · 2.70 Impact Factor