Article

Using item banks to construct measures of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials: investigator perceptions

Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
Clinical Trials (Impact Factor: 1.94). 02/2008; 5(6):575-86. DOI: 10.1177/1740774508098414
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Item response theory (IRT) promises more sensitive and efficient measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) than traditional approaches; however, the selection and use of PRO measures from IRT-based item banks differ from current methods of using PRO measures.
To anticipate barriers to the adoption of IRT item banks into clinical trials.
We conducted semistructured telephone or in-person interviews with 42 clinical researchers who published results from clinical trials in the Journal of the American Medical Association, the New England Journal of Medicine, or other leading clinical journals from July 2005 through May 2006. Interviews included a brief tutorial on IRT item banks.
After the tutorial, 39 of 42 participants understood the novel products available from an IRT item bank, namely customized short forms and computerized adaptive testing. Most participants (38/42) thought that item banks could be useful in their clinical trials, but they mentioned several potential barriers to adoption, including economic and logistical constraints, concerns about whether item banks are better than current PRO measures, concerns about how to convince study personnel or statisticians to use item banks, concerns about FDA or sponsor acceptance, and the lack of availability of item banks validated in specific disease populations.
Selection bias might have led to more positive responses to the concept of item banks in clinical trials.
Clinical investigators are open to a new method of PRO measurement offered in IRT item banks, but bank developers must address investigator and stakeholder concerns before widespread adoption can be expected.

Full-text

Available from: Kevin P Weinfurt, May 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
116 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to compare measurement precisions of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and a computer adaptive testing (CAT) method. The ODQ has been regarded as one of the most reliable condition-specific measure for back pain for decades. Cross-sectional study was carried out with two independent convenient samples from two out-patient rehabilitation clinics for back pain () and non-back pain group (). Participants were asked to fill out the ODQ and CAT of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Activity Measure (ICF-AM). A series of Rasch analyses were performed to calculate person ability measures. The CAT measures had greater relative precision in discriminating the groups than did the ODQ measure in comparisons of the relative precision. The CAT measure appears to be more effective than did the ODQ measure in terms of measurement precision. By administering test items calibrated in a way, CAT measures using item response theory may promise a means with measurement precision as well as efficiency.
    11/2013; 20(4). DOI:10.12674/ptk.2013.20.4.022
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relative precision is to denote the ratio of the error variance of two sample designs. The aim of the present study was to compare measurement precisions of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and a computer adaptive testing (CAT) method for measuring disability resulting from back pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out with two independent convenient samples from two out-patient rehabilitation clinics for back pain (N = 42) and non-back pain groups (N = 42). Participants were asked to fill out the ODQ and CAT of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - Activity Measure (ICF-AM). A series of Rasch analyses were performed to calculate person ability measures. RESULTS: The CAT measures had greater precision in discriminating the groups than did the ODQ measure in comparisons of the relative precision. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT measure appears to be more effective than the ODQ measure in terms of measurement precision. By administering test items calibrated in a way, CAT measures using item response theory may promise a means with measurement precision as well as efficiency.
    Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 07/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.3233/BMR-140502 · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A new mathematical model of the myelinated nerve fiber was applied to the study of conduction behavior. This model represents the myelinated nerve fiber as a multiaxial equivalent electric circuit incorporating separate intra-axonal, periaxonal and extra-axonal longitudinal conductive pathways with independent representations of the myelin sheath versus the underlying axolemmal membrane. A detailed anatomical representation of the node is included, with the periaxonal space extending to the nodal compartment. Both amphibian and mammalian nerve fibers were modeled. Model results show a physiological conduction velocity of 57.6 m/s for 17.5-μm-diameter mammalian nerve fiber at 37°C with a change in conduction velocity versus temperature closely correlated to experimental findings. The periaxonal space width and the axon radius in the paranodal region are shown to have a strong influence on conduction velocity
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1989. Images of the Twenty-First Century., Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in; 12/1989