Intracranial hemorrhage and liver-associated deaths associated with tipranavir/ritonavir: review of cases from the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System.

Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, USA.
AIDS patient care and STDs (Impact Factor: 3.58). 12/2008; 22(11):843-50. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2008.0043
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Tipranavir (TPV), a protease inhibitor, has box warnings for intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and hepatotoxicity (including hepatic failure and death). A box warning is a labeling statement about serious adverse events leading to significant injury and/or death. A box warning is the most serious warning placed in the labeling of a prescription medication. As a result of the respective morbidity and mortality associated with ICH and hepatic failure, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) was searched for reports of these adverse events in HIV-infected patients receiving a tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r)-based regimen. This search comprised part of the FDA's safety analysis for traditional approval. From July 2006 to March 2007, 10 cases of ICH were identified in AERS. From June 2005 to March 2007, 12 cases of liver-associated deaths were identified. One patient experienced liver failure and fatal ICH. Most patients with these events had additional risk factors. Among patients with liver-associated deaths, 3 had HIV-RNA less than 400 copies per milliliter at the time of hepatic failure. Among 10 patients who discontinued TPV/r when hepatic failure developed, median number of days post-TPV/r to death was 23 (range, 2-69 days). Review of AERS did not identify new safety concerns regarding ICH. Among most patients with liver-associated deaths, death appears to occur soon after hepatic failure develops. If considering TPV/r, careful assessment of risk/benefit is suggested for patients at risk for ICH and hepatic failure.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the early years of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era, HIV with resistance to two or more agents in different antiretroviral classes posed a significant clinical challenge. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV was an important cause of treatment failure, morbidity, and mortality. Treatment options at the time were limited; multiple drug regimens with or without enfuvirtide were used with some success but proved to be difficult to sustain for reasons of tolerability, toxicity, and cost. Starting in 2006, data began to emerge supporting the use of new drugs from the original antiretroviral classes (tipranavir, darunavir, and etravirine) and drugs from new classes (raltegravir and maraviroc) for the treatment of MDR HIV. Their availability has enabled patients with MDR HIV to achieve full and durable viral suppression with more compact and cost-effective regimens including at least two and often three fully active agents. The emergence of drug-resistant HIV is expected to continue to become less frequent in the future, driven by improvements in the convenience, tolerability, efficacy, and durability of first-line HAART regimens. To continue this trend, the optimal rollout of HAART in both rich and resource-limited settings will require careful planning and strategic use of antiretroviral drugs and monitoring technologies.
    AIDS research and treatment 11/2012; 2012:595762. DOI:10.1155/2012/595762
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rapid advances in drug discovery and the development of antiretroviral therapy is unprecedented in the history of modern medicine. The administration of chronic combination antiretroviral therapy targeting different stages of the human immunodeficiency virus' replicative life cycle allows for durable and maximal suppression of plasma viremia. This suppression has resulted in dramatic improvement of patient survival. This article reviews the history of antiretroviral drug development and discusses the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and toxicities of the antiretroviral agents most commonly used in clinical practice to date.
    Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 09/2014; 28(3):371-402. DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2014.06.001 · 2.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tipranavir (TPV) is a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor with potent in vitro activity against most HIV-1 strains resistant to other protease inhibitors. In vitro data have shown that resistance to TPV develops slowly. When coadministered with ritonavir (RTV) as a booster, TPV has shown potent antiviral activity in multiple antiretroviral-experienced patients. In the RESIST-1 and RESIST-2 studies, the efficacy and safety of TPV/RTV (500/200 mg twice daily) in highly treatment-experienced HIV-1-positive patients was assessed. Analysis at 48 weeks showed that TPV/RTV-containing regimens significantly improved immune and virological responses compared with a RTV-boosted comparator protease inhibitor plus optimized background regimen. TPV is generally well tolerated; nevertheless, clinical hepatitis and liver decompensation have been associated to its use, together with an indication of an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Extensive listing of drug-drug interactions have been reported with TPV.
    Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology 02/2009; 2(2):147-153. DOI:10.1586/17512433.2.2.147