Article

Effect of salinity stress on growth and carbohydrate metabolism in three Rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity tolerance

Applied Taxonomic Research Center, Department of Biology Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002 Thailand.
Indian journal of experimental biology (Impact Factor: 0.75). 11/2008; 46(10):736-42.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rice seedlings cv. Khao Dawk Mali 105 (salt-sensitive), Luang Anan (moderately salt-tolerant) and Pokkali (salt-tolerant) were exposed to 0, 50, 100 and 150 mM NaCI for 9 d. Salinity stress caused reduction in leaf relative water contents in all cultivars. Shoot length of cv. Pokkali was least affected by salinity stress whereas increased root length in response to salinity stress was apparent in cvs. Khao Dawk Mali 105 and Luang Anan. Increased salinity level also caused reduction in fresh and dry weights in cvs. Khao Dawk Mali 105 and Luang Anan, but had no effect in cv. Pokkali except at 150 mM. Accumulation of total soluble sugars and sucrose in mature leaves were observed in cv. Khao Dawk Mali 105 exposed to high level of salinity whereas their concentrations in cvs. Luang Anan and Pokkali remained the same as control plants. Accumulation of sucrose in cv. Khao Dawk Mali 105 was suggested to be resulted from the alteration of photosynthate partitioning since the activities of sucrose phosphate synthase were not affected by salinity in this cultivar. On the contrary, salinity stress induced an accumulation of starch in cv. Pokkali. It is suggested that partitioning sugars into starch may involve in salinity tolerance by avoiding metabolic alterations.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maysaya Thitisaksakul, Jan 15, 2014
1 Follower
 · 
349 Views
 · 
720 Downloads
  • Source
    • "Similar conclusions were recorded by Khajeh-Hosseini et al. (2003), Jamil et al. (2006), Munns et al. (2006), Maghsoudi Moud and Maghsoudi (2008) and McGrath and Reyes (2008). Pattanagule and Thitisaksakul (2008) reported that carbohydrates are accumulated in plant tissues under saline condition and these substances are suspected of contributing to osmotic adjustment. Khavari- Nejad et al. (2008), Hajiboland et al. (2009), Dadkhah (2010) and Saadat et al. (2012) indicated that germination characters i.e. germination percentage and SVI were decreased as salinity concentration increased. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The response of six sugar beet genotypes (Raspoly, Nada, Strube, Almaz, Toro, Oskarpoly) under seven salinity levels (distilled water as control, 1500, 3000, 45000, 6000, 7500 and 9000 ppm NaCl) and soaking in gibberellic acid levels were studied on germination parameters. An experiment with factorial arrangement was conducted by using randomize complete block design with four replications. Seed soaking in GA3 significantly affected final germination percentage (FGP), mean germination time (MGT), coefficient velocity (CV), seedling vigor index (SVI), energy of germination (EG), emergence rate (ER) and speed of germination (SG). Highest averages of FGP, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG, were produced from soaking seed in 200 ppm of GA3. Moreover, highest averages of MGT were recorded from soaking sugar beet seed in the control treatment. Sugar beet cultivars significantly differed in FGP, MGT, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG. Highest averages of FGP, MGT, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG were recorded with sown Raspoly cultivar. Increasing salinity concentrations from 0 to 9,000 ppm significantly decreased FGP, CV, SVI, EG, ER and SG. While, MGT increased with increasing salinity concentrations. Results of means comparison showed that in all genotypes, there was a decrease in germination percentage due to salinity stress increment and maximum germination percentage was delayed. The interaction between cultivars and seed soaking in GA3 levels significantly affected FGP, MGT, CV and SVI. The interaction between seed soaking in GA3 levels and salinity concentrations significantly affected FGP, MGT and SVI.
    Sugar Tech 06/2014; 16(2). DOI:10.1007/s12355-013-0252-7 · 0.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Soluble sugars, the primary product of photosynthesis in higher plants, play a key role as building blocks of macromolecules controlling plant growth and development (Gibson 2000; Smeekens 2000; Price et al. 2004). They are not only involved in osmoregulation mechanisms within the cell, controlling water potential and osmotic potential (Pattanagul and Thitisaksakul 2008; Cha-um et al. 2009a, b), but also help in detoxification by acting as chelating agents to trap Na + within starch granules (Kanai et al. 2007). Interestingly, soluble sugars act as signal molecules and are also involved in regulating genes related to salt-tolerance defence mechanisms (Arbona et al. 2005; Gupta and Kaur 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Soluble carbohydrates play a key role as osmolytes and significantly contribute in salt defence mechanism, especially in halophyte species. The objective of this study is to investigate the transcriptional expression of starch-related genes, sugar profile and physiological performances of two contrasting rice genotypes, Pokkali (salt tolerant) and IR29 (salt sensitive), in response to salt stress. Total soluble sugars, glucose and fructose levels in the flag leaf of salt-stressed Pokkali rice were enhanced relative to soluble starch accumulation in plants exposed to EC = 13.25 dS m(-1) (salt stress) for 3 days. In Pokkali, the net photosynthetic rate and starch metabolism may play a key role as energy resources under salt stress. In contrast, photosynthetic performance, indicated by photosynthetic pigment levels and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, in salt-stressed IR29 was significantly reduced, leading to delayed starch biosynthesis. The reduction in photosynthetic ability and lack of defence mechanisms in IR29 caused growth inhibition and yield loss. Soluble starch and soluble sugar enrichment in Pokkali rice may function alternatively as osmotic adjustment in salt defence mechanism and strengthen carbon energy reserves, greater survival prospects under salt stress and enhanced productivity.
    Protoplasma 04/2013; 250(5). DOI:10.1007/s00709-013-0496-9 · 3.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "11.83 114.83 28.20 55.20 23.25 144.40 33.70 58.10 Seawater 30.73 97.90 28.90 55.77 19.40 74.63 45.60 70.27 CaCl 2 38.95 149.95 30.30 57.97 24.17 214.50 45.40 74.07 Seawater + CaCl 2 45.25 131.25 36.50 67.10 32.33 102.33 48.27 80.93 L.S.D. at 5% 3.35 5.12 2.05 2.71 3.77 6.34 3.78 2.86 (Pattanaqul and Thitisakaskul, 2008 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effect of calcium chloride (CaCl2) as an ameliorating agent on seawater stress was studied in canola (Brassica napus L.). Plants were raised in pots and exposed to seawater stress (30%) with or without 200 ppm CaCl2. Seawater-stressed plants showed decreased growth, water content, leaf area, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, potassium (K), calcium (Ca), K/ sodium (Na) ratio and ascorbate peroxidase (APX activity), and increased total protein, free amino acid, proline, Na, the activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), glutathione reductase (GR) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content. Application of 200 ppm of CaCl2 by seed soaking was accompanied by higher values of water content, leaf area, photosynthetic pigments, total sugars, total protein, K, Ca, K/Na ratio and the activity of CAT, POD, APX and GR. In contrast, treatment with CaCl2 resulted mostly in a decrease in free amino acids, proline, Na and MDA as compared with the seawater plants, which partially alleviated the adverse effect of seawater salinity on growth. Seawater stress led to the appearance of four protein bands of molecular weights 94, 27, 25 and 13 KDa. Seed treatment with CaCl2 led to the appearance of six polypeptides with molecular weights 235, 87, 43, 27, 25 and 13 KDa. The 100, 57, 19, 17 and 14 KDa protein bands which were no longer apparent with salinity were apparent under the interactive effects of salinity and CaCl2.
    Journal of Plant Nutrition 06/2011; 34(9-11-9):1303-1320. DOI:10.1080/01904167.2011.580817 · 0.54 Impact Factor
Show more