Stratus optical coherence tomography study of filtering blebs after primary trabeculectomy with a fornix-based conjunctival flap

Department of Ophthalmology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa, Japan.
Acta ophthalmologica (Impact Factor: 2.44). 12/2008; 88(1):60-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01401.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the relationship between filtering bleb function and Stratus optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.
We studied 72 eyes of 65 consecutive patients who had a fornix-based conjunctival flap in primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC). Filtering blebs with various types of glaucoma were examined using Stratus OCT. Success rates were defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) < or = 15 mmHg and IOP reduction > or = 25% without medication or additional surgery. Success rates among classified groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test.
Blebs were classified into three different categories on the basis of the following Stratus OCT patterns: cystoid type (multiple cysts inside the bleb; 17 eyes), diffuse type (low to high reflective areas that were mixed inside the bleb; 31 eyes) and layer type (medium to high reflective layer inside the bleb; 24 eyes). Success rates in the cystoid-, diffuse- and layer-type blebs were 94%, 97% and 75% (P = 0.02), respectively.
In trabeculectomy with MMC and a fornix-based conjunctival flap, there is a significant association between the success rates and the postoperative Stratus OCT findings of filtering blebs.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Evaluation of patients after trabeculectomy can be aided by the use of anterior segment imaging. Two commonly used forms of imaging are ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). Both modalities can be used to assess bleb morphology and how it affects treatment outcome, measure anterior chamber biometry, identify the presence of supraciliochoroidal fluid, cyclodialysis clefts and malignant glaucoma, and evaluate treatment modalities after trabeculectomy such as in laser suture lysis and needling. OCT, with its finer resolution, is able to view the bleb wall anatomy in detail and because of its non-contact nature can examine the eye sooner after trabeculectomy. UBM, on the other hand, is superior for the visualization of deeper structures such as the ciliary body and posterior chamber essential to identify malignant glaucoma.
    Seminars in ophthalmology 09/2012; 27(5-6):160-4. DOI:10.3109/08820538.2012.707275 · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To provide a qualitative and quantitative analysis of filtering blebs with optical coherence tomography (OCT) in patients after primary trabeculectomy. Evaluation of diagnostic technology. We retrospectively studied 20 eyes of 20 patients who had a fornix-based flap in primary trabeculectomy: 14 with mitomycin C (MMC) and 6 without MMC. Filtering blebs were examined using 2 types of OCTs working at a wavelength of 840 and 1310 nm. In this study, we analyzed both the OCT morphologic pattern and the internal structures of blebs, including bleb wall thickness, scleral flap thickness, and the route under the scleral flap, and quantified the reflectivity of the intrableb area. Blebs were classified according to the Hirooka scheme in 3 OCT morphologic patterns: cystoid, diffuse, and layer type. The MMC was associated with the surgical success (100%). A significant association was found between good functionality and cystoid type with both devices: 840-nm OCT (p = 0.02) and 1310-nm OCT (p = 0.04). A significant difference in morphologic patterns was found using the 2 OCTs. There were no significant differences between successful and unsuccessful filtering surgery for intrableb structures. The reflectivity of filtering blebs correlated very well to the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP; R(2) = 0.90; p < 0.001) and to the reduction of IOP (R(2) = 0.58; p = 0.001). Our method to quantify the reflectivity showed a significant degree of intergrader consensus (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99; p < 0.001). Although 840-nm OCT was not developed to assess the anterior segment, it may be considered a useful tool to evaluate the functionality of blebs in the postoperative period.
    Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 04/2014; 49(2):210-6. DOI:10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.10.003 · 1.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To investigate the correlation between bleb morphology and IOP control via the modified Indiana Bleb Appearance Grading Scale (IBAGS) and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in two different trabeculectomy (TLE) groups. Methods: This study involved 94 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma which underwent two different TLE methods; limbal-based TLE (group I, 62 eyes) and fornix-based TLE (group II, 32). IOP control was defined as successful with an IOP ≤ 20 mmHg and ≥ 20 % reduction of preoperative IOP. IBAGS and various parameters of the bleb height, extent, wall thickness, ciliochoroidal detachment (CCD), and lake under the scleral flap (LUSF) were obtained by slit-lamp and AS-OCT, respectively. Correlation between IOP control and IBAGS/AS-OCT parameters were assessed by SAS®. Results: Both groups had the same success rate. As to correlation between IOP control and IBAGS, extent and Seidel were the best-paired parameters in group I (Cp=3.0402, R=0.6401), yet no parameter was significant in group II (maximum R=0.1599). As to correlation between IOP control and AS-OCT, the combinations of height, extent, and the minimum value of bleb wall thickness were significant (Cp=0.2037, 0.2314, R=0.4336, 0.4330) in group I. In group II, no parameter was significant, except CCD and/or LUSF (p=0.032). As to coincidence of IBAGS and AS-OCT parameters, height and extent in group I (p=0.000, p=0.000) and height in group II were statistically significant (p=0.020). Conclusions: IOP control in limbal-based TLE seemed to be more dependent upon the large size and thinned-wall bleb than that in fornix-based TLE.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 08/2013; 54(10). DOI:10.1167/iovs.13-12439 · 3.43 Impact Factor