Computerized Provider Order Entry Adoption: Implications for Clinical Workflow

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 12/2008; 24(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0857-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify and describe unintended adverse consequences related to clinical workflow when implementing or using computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems.
We analyzed qualitative data from field observations and formal interviews gathered over a three-year period at five hospitals in three organizations. Five multidisciplinary researchers worked together to identify themes related to the impacts of CPOE systems on clinical workflow.
CPOE systems can affect clinical work by 1) introducing or exposing human/computer interaction problems, 2) altering the pace, sequencing, and dynamics of clinical activities, 3) providing only partial support for the work activities of all types of clinical personnel, 4) reducing clinical situation awareness, and 5) poorly reflecting organizational policy and procedure.
As CPOE systems evolve, those involved must take care to mitigate the many unintended adverse effects these systems have on clinical workflow. Workflow issues resulting from CPOE can be mitigated by iteratively altering both clinical workflow and the CPOE system until a satisfactory fit is achieved.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Federal electronic health record (EHR)–related initiatives are leading to rapid increases in their adoption. Despite their benefits, EHRs also introduce new risks that can lead to serious safety events. We conducted a Web-based survey of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management and the American Health Lawyers Association to elicit perceptions regarding the frequency and types of EHR-related serious safety events. We received 369 responses. The majority (66%) worked for large hospitals and health systems with varying degrees of EHR adoption. More than half (53%) of respondents reported at least one EHR-related serious safety event in the previous 5 years, and 10% reported more than 20 events. EHR workflow (63%), user familiarity with the EHR system (63%), and integration with existing systems (59%) were most frequently endorsed as variables associated with EHR-related serious safety events. Because EHR-related safety concerns are underreported, organizations should consider implementing robust measures of EHR safety within their institution as a key step for mitigating these concerns.
    Journal of healthcare risk management: the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management 07/2014; 34(1). DOI:10.1002/jhrm.21146
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives The objectives of this study were to measure physician satisfaction with a recently introduced electronic medical record (EMR) system and to determine which of the individual attributes of EMR were related to physician satisfaction. Methods One year after introduction of an EMR system, physicians in an inpatient department were asked to answer a self-administered survey. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine which attributes were significantly related to overall satisfaction with the system. Linear regression analysis was then performed to examine the association between the three main domains of the questionnaire and overall satisfaction with the system, with adjustment for physician demographic characteristics. Results A total of 115 physicians answered the survey. Only 40% were satisfied with the system overall. The best predictors of overall satisfaction were performance in the form of speed, integration with workflow, and patient information, such as accuracy, completeness and timeliness. Conclusion Physicians were generally not satisfied with the system. Continued evaluation of such systems and feedback from users should guide future selection and implementation.
    09/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2014.01.004
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The results from past studies about the effects of second-generation e-prescribing systems on community pharmacists' outcomes and practices are inconclusive, and the claims of effectiveness and efficiency of such systems have not been supported in all studies. There is a strong need to study the factors that lead to positive outcomes for the users of these systems. Objective This paper intends to bridge the above gaps by empirically examining the impacts of user interface usability on the community pharmacists’ outcomes. Methods A quantitative survey research method was used and the data was collected from the community pharmacists, who use an e-prescribing system. Data from 152 questionnaires collected in a national survey were used to for the study. Partial Least Squares (PLS) path modeling was used to examine scale reliability, validity and hypotheses. Results The scale was found to test well for reliability and validity. Examining the hypotheses illustrated that ease of use (p< 0.01, t= 5.79) and information quality (p< 0.01, t= 6.24) of an e-prescribing system improved pharmacists' outcomes (including communication, facilitation of care, reduction of workload and medical errors) while ease of use of the system was influenced by user interface consistency (p< 0.01, t= 7.35) and system error prevention (p< 0.01, t=5.29). Conclusion To improve community pharmacists’ outcomes and practices, the ease of use, information quality, consistency and error prevention features of e-prescribing systems should be improved. It was found that information quality had a stronger impact on the outcomes and hence improving the quality of the generated information would have higher impacts on users’ outcomes.
    Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 08/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.08.011 · 2.35 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014