Hemispheric specialization for language according to grapho-phonemic transformation and gender. A divided visual field experiment.

Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neurocognition, UMR CNRS 5105, Université Pierre Mendès-France, BP 47, 38040 Grenoble Cedex 09, France.
Brain and Cognition (Impact Factor: 2.82). 12/2008; 69(3):465-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This behavioral study aimed at assessing the effect of two variables on the degree of hemispheric specialization for language. One of them was the grapho-phonemic translation (transformation) (letter-sound mapping) and the other was the participants'gender. The experiment was conducted with healthy volunteers. A divided visual field procedure has been used to perform a phoneme detection task implying either regular (transparent) grapho-phonemic translation (letter-sound mapping consistency) or irregular (non-transparent) grapho-phonemic translation (letter-sound mapping inconsistency). Our results reveal a significant effect of grapho-phonemic translation on the degree of hemispheric dominance for language. The phoneme detection on items with transparent translation (TT) was performed faster than phoneme detection on items with non-transparent translation (NTT). This effect seems to be due to faster identification of TT than NTT when the items were presented in the left visual field (LVF)-right hemisphere (RH). There was no difference between TT and NTT for stimuli presented in the right visual field (RVF)-left hemisphere (LH). This result suggests that grapho-phonemic translation or the degree of transparency can affect the degree of hemispheric specialization, by modulating the right hemisphere activity. With respect to gender, male participants were significantly more lateralized than female participants but no interaction was observed between gender and degree of transparency.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the presented experiment we explored the effect of lexicality on hemisphere specialisation and cooperation during a phonological task. The divided visual field (DVF) method with bilateral presentation (BVF) of redundant (identical) stimuli is considered an appropriate approach to assess inter-hemispheric cooperation (IHC). IHC is supposed to increase the efficiency of cognitive processes. Specifically, it has been shown that, compared to unilateral hemifield presentation, word processing is significantly more efficient if stimuli were presented under bilateral redundancy conditions. The performance enhancement during bilateral vs. unilateral presentation is called bilateral redundant gain (BRG). In the present experiment a DVF was used and participants were required to perform a rhyme detection task in two blocks, one in words and another one in pseudowords. Each item was presented in two different modes, one unilateral (right or left hemi-visual field) and another one bilateral (simultaneous redundant presentation). Unilateral trials allow one to study hemispheric specialisation, while bilateral redundant trials allow one to study inter-hemispheric cooperation. We obtained left hemisphere specialisation for both types of items (word, pseudoword). Moreover, words were more efficiently processed than pseudowords. Additionally, words were processed more efficiently in BVF than in unilateral presentation, inducing BRG. No similar effect was obtained for pseudowords. These results are discussed in respect to findings reported by other studies suggesting that hemispheric specialisation depends on lexicality. Moreover, compared to lexical decision tasks used in previous studies, the phonological task used in the present study seems to modulate the inter-hemispheric cooperation less. PMID: 22489628 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
    Laterality 04/2012; · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neuroscientific investigation of sex differences has an unsavoury past, in which scientific claims reinforced and legitimated gender roles in ways that were not scientifically justified. Feminist critics have recently argued that the current use of functional neuroimaging technology in sex differences research largely follows that tradition. These charges of ‘neurosexism’ have been countered with arguments that the research being done is informative and valuable and that an over-emphasis on the perils, rather than the promise, of such research threatens to hinder scientific progress. To investigate the validity of these contrasting concerns, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations of sex differences and citation practices were systematically examined. In line with the notion of neurosexism, the research was found to support the influence of false-positive claims of sex differences in the brain, to enable the proliferation of untested, stereotype-consistent functional interpretations, and to pay insufficient attention to the potential plasticity of sex differences in both brain and mind. This, it is argued, creates a literature biased toward the presentation of sex differences in the brain as extensive, functionally significant, and fixed—and therefore implicitly supportive of a gender essentialist perspective. It is suggested that taking feminist criticisms into account would bring about substantial improvement in the quality of the science, as well as a reduction in socially harmful consequences.
    Neuroethics 01/2013; 6(2). · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Growing evidence suggests that age impacts on interhemispheric representation of language. Dichotic listening test allows assessing language lateralization for spoken language and it generally reveals right-ear/left-hemisphere (LH) predominance for language in young adult subjects. According to reported results, elderly would display increasing LH predominance in some studies or stable LH language lateralization for language in others ones. The aim of this study was to depict the main pattern of results in respect with the effect of normal aging on the hemisphere specialization for language by using dichotic listening test. A meta-analysis based on 11 studies has been performed. The inter-hemisphere asymmetry does not seem to increase according to age. A supplementary qualitative analysis suggests that right-ear advantage seems to increase between 40 and 49 y old and becomes stable or decreases after 55 y old, suggesting right-ear/LH decline.
    Geriatrie et psychologie neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement 03/2013; 11(1):57-64. · 0.40 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 1, 2014

View other sources