Article

A Meta-Analysis of Head-to-Head Comparisons of Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

Universidad de La Frontera, Ciudad Temuco, Araucanía, Chile
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 13.56). 11/2008; 166(2):152-63. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030368
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Whether there are differences in efficacy among second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia is a matter of heated debate. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded studies comparing second-generation antipsychotics head-to-head.
Searches of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (May 2007) and MEDLINE (September 2007) were conducted for randomized, blinded studies comparing two or more of nine second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. All data were extracted by at least three reviewers independently. The primary outcome measure was change in total score on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; secondary outcome measures were positive and negative symptom subscores and rate of dropout due to inefficacy. The results were combined in a meta-analysis. Various sensitivity analyses and metaregressions were used to examine bias.
The analysis included 78 studies with 167 relevant arms and 13,558 participants. Olanzapine proved superior to aripiprazole, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone. Risperidone was more efficacious than quetiapine and ziprasidone. Clozapine proved superior to zotepine and, in doses >400 mg/day, to risperidone. These differences were due to improvement in positive symptoms rather than negative symptoms. The results were rather robust with regard to the effects of industry sponsorship, study quality, dosages, and trial duration.
The findings suggest that some second-generation antipsychotics may be somewhat more efficacious than others, but the limitations of meta-analysis must be considered. In tailoring drug treatment to the individual patient, small efficacy superiorities must be weighed against large differences in side effects and cost.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Claudia Asenjo, Jul 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
115 Views
  • Source
    • "Cohen's guideline was adopted such that ESs of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 corresponded to small, medium, and large effects, respectively (Cohen, 1988). Since the study of Prins and colleagues (Prins et al., 2014) did not report standard deviation of %TBV/y and %HV/y, we imputed the SD from Schuff et al. (2011) as has been done before (Leucht et al., 2009). The Cochrane risk of bias criteria (Cochrane Collaboration, http://www.cochrane.org/) "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has not been a conclusive evidence for prevention of brain atrophy by anti-dementia drugs (ADDs) in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Relevant studies were identified through searches of PubMed®, databases of the Cochrane Library©, and PsycINFO citations up to 5/16/2015. Only double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of ADDs in patients with MCI or AD were included. Primary outcomes were annualized percent change of total brain volume (%TBV/year), annualized percent change of hippocampal volume (%HV/year), and annualized percent change of ventricular volume (%VV/year) measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for relevant outcomes. Seven RCTs (n=1708) were found to meet the inclusion criteria, including 4 MCI studies (n=1327) and 3 AD studies (n=381) [3 donepezil studies (2 MCI studies and 1 AD study), 1 galantaime study for MCI, 2 mementine studies for AD and 1 rivastigmine study for MCI]. Pooled ADDs showed superior protective outcomes compared to placebo regarding %TBV/year (SMD=-0.21, 95%CI=-0.37 to -0.04, p=0.01, N=4, n=624) and %VV/year (SMD=-0.79, 95%CI=-1.40 to -0.19, p=0.01, N=3, n=851). However, %HV/year failed to show difference between both groups. Among ADDs, donepezil showed significantly greater protective effects than placebo regarding %TBV/year (SMD=-0.43, 95%CI=-0.74 to -0.12, p=0.007, N=1, n=164) and %VV/year (SMD=-0.51, 95%CI=-0.73 to -0.29, p<0.00001, N=2, n=338). Rivastigmine was also superior to placebo regarding %VV/year (SMD=-1.33, 95%CI=-1.52 to -1.14, p<0.00001). The results favored the hypothesis that ADDs may prevent brain atrophy in patients with MCI and AD. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.
    The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 06/2015; DOI:10.1093/ijnp/pyv070 · 5.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, because of the esthetic consequences and social stigmatism associated with being overweight or obese, patient compliance is reduced, which increases the risk of relapse and re-hospitalization (Lieberman et al., 2005). Although several other antipsychotics on the market today are less likely to induce weight gain (especially ziprasidone and aripiprazole), none has proved to be as therapeutically effective as olanzapine (Leucht et al., 2009; Komossa et al., 2010). It is, therefore, necessary to develop novel treatment strategies that obtain an equal therapeutic response without increasing body weight. "
  • Source
    • "despite their higher costs and inconsistency of the data showing their superior efficacy versus FGAs [5] [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antipsychotic-induced extrapyramidal adverse effects are well recognized in the context of first-generation antipsychotic drugs. However, the introduction of second-generation antipsychotics, with atypical mechanism of action, especially lower dopamine receptors affinity, was met with great expectations among clinicians regarding their potentially lower propensity to cause extrapyramidal syndrome. This review gives a brief summary of the recent literature relevant to second-generation antipsychotics and extrapyramidal syndrome. Numerous studies have examined the incidence and severity of extrapyramidal syndrome with first- and second-generation antipsychotics. The majority of these studies clearly indicate that extrapyramidal syndrome does occur with second-generation agents, though in lower rates in comparison with first generation. Risk factors are the choice of a particular second-generation agent (with clozapine carrying the lowest risk and risperidone the highest), high doses, history of previous extrapyramidal symptoms, and comorbidity. Also, in comparative studies, the choice of a first-generation comparator significantly influences the results. Extrapyramidal syndrome remains clinically important even in the era of second-generation antipsychotics. The incidence and severity of extrapyramidal syndrome differ amongst these antipsychotics, but the fact is that these drugs have not lived up to the expectation regarding their tolerability.
    BioMed Research International 06/2014; 2014. DOI:10.1155/2014/656370 · 2.71 Impact Factor
Show more