Article

Immune therapy for cancer.

Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Vaccine Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Annual Review of Immunology (Impact Factor: 36.56). 12/2008; 27:83-117. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132544
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the past decade, immune therapy has become a standard treatment for a variety of cancers. Monoclonal antibodies, immune adjuvants, and vaccines against oncogenic viruses are now well-established cancer therapies. Immune modulation is a principal element of supportive care for many high-dose chemotherapy regimens. In addition, immune activation is now appreciated as central to the therapeutic mechanism of bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Advances in our understanding of the molecular interactions between tumors and the immune system have led to many novel investigational therapies and continue to inform efforts for devising more potent therapeutics. Novel approaches to immune-based cancer treatment strive to augment antitumor immune responses by expanding tumor-reactive T cells, providing exogenous immune-activating stimuli, and antagonizing regulatory pathways that induce immune tolerance. The future of immune therapy for cancer is likely to combine many of these approaches to generate more effective treatments.

8 Bookmarks
 · 
162 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Immunoprevention refers to a strategy of preventing pathogen-associated and spontaneous cancers through the use of vaccines, antibodies, and immune modulators. Immune modulators function by enhancing the endogenous ability of the immune system to monitor for malignancy, so-called "immunosurveillance." There is growing evidence that many of the most promising cancer chemoprevention agents including aspirin, COX-2 inhibitors, aromatase inhibitors, and bisphosphonates mediate their effects, in part, by enhancing immunosurveillance and reversing the immune evasive mechanisms that premalignant lesions use. In the following review, we introduce critical components of the human immune surveillance system-dendritic cells, T cells, and immune suppressive cells-and discuss the emerging data suggesting that common chemoprevention agents may modulate the function of these immunologic cells. Cancer Prev Res; 6(8); 764-73. ©2013 AACR.
    Cancer Prevention Research 08/2013; 6(8):764-73. · 4.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Myeloid‐derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T (Treg) cells are major components of the immune suppressive tumour microenvironment (TME). Both cell types expand systematically in preclinical tumour models and promote T‐cell dysfunction that in turn favours tumour progression. Clinical reports show a positive correlation between elevated levels of both suppressors and tumour burden. Recent studies further revealed that MDSCs can modulate the de novo development and induction of Treg cells. The overlapping target cell population of Treg cells and MDSCs is indicative for the importance and flexibility of immune suppression under pathological conditions. It also suggests the existence of common pathways that can be used for clinical interventions aiming to manipulate the TME. Elimination or reprogramming of the immune suppressive TME is one of the major current challenges in immunotherapy of cancer. Interestingly, recent findings suggest that natural killer T (NKT) cells can acquire the ability to convert immunosuppressive MDSCs into immunity‐promoting antigen‐presenting cells. Here we will review the cross‐talk between MDSCs and other immune cells, focusing on Treg cells and NKT cells. We will consider its impact on basic and applied cancer research and discuss how targeting MDSCs may pave the way for future immunocombination therapies.
    Immunology 01/2013; 138(2). · 3.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Recombinant virus vaccines are often less effective due to immunodominant responses against endogenous vector antigens. However, the use of small RNA virus vectors provides an opportunity to limit host exposure to endogenous virus antigens and focus immune responses on the desired vaccine antigen. Using the Daniel's strain of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus, we have identified strategies to modulate responses to endogenous viral proteins by manipulating the host CD8+ T-cell repertoire prior to infection or through the use of mutations introduced into the virus genome. Both of these approaches enhance responses to vaccine antigens introduced into the picornavirus. However, the use of mutant immunodominant epitopes provides an opportunity for enhancing vaccine responses without further manipulation of the host. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that modification of the consensus MHC class I anchor residue within the virus genome can promote enhanced immunity to foreign antigens and self-antigens embedded in the virus genome.
    Viral immunology. 07/2014;