Conserved Spatial Organization of FG Domains in the Nuclear Pore Complex

Laboratory of Cellular Biophysics, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York.
Biophysical Journal (Impact Factor: 3.97). 01/2013; 104(1):37-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3823
Source: PubMed


Selective transport through the nuclear pore complex (NPC) requires nucleoporins containing natively unfolded phenylalanine-glycine (FG) domains. Several differing models for their dynamics within the pore have been proposed. We characterize the behavior of the FG nucleoporins in vivo using polarized fluorescence microscopy. Using nucleoporins tagged with green fluorescent protein along their FG domains, we show that some of these proteins are ordered, indicating an overall orientational organization within the NPC. This orientational ordering of the FG domains depends on their specific context within the NPC, but is independent of active transport and cargo load. For most nups, behavior does not depend on the FG motifs. These data support a model whereby local geometry constrains the orientational organization of the FG nups. Intriguingly, homologous yeast and mammalian proteins show conserved behavior, suggesting functional relevance. Our findings have implications for mechanistic models of NPC transport.

Download full-text


Available from: Sanford Simon, Dec 23, 2013
17 Reads
  • Source
    Biophysical Journal 01/2013; 104(1):6-7. DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.3824 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Functions of IDPs/IDPRs may arise from a specific disordered form, from interconversion between disordered forms, and from transitions between disordered and ordered states. The choice between these states is determined by the specific protein environment. Many IDPs possess an exceptional ability to fold in a template-dependent manner, where a single IDPR can bind to multiple partners gaining very different structures in the bound state. Composition-based classification takes into account a simple fact that the polypeptide chains involved in the complex formation can be identical or nonidentical, thereby giving raise to homo- and hetero-oligomers. Geometrically, units of the homo-oligomers can be organized isologously or heterologously, where isologous association involves the same surface on both monomers of the homo-oligomer, and an heterologous association relies on different interfaces.
    Chemical Reviews 04/2014; 114(13). DOI:10.1021/cr4007329 · 46.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intrinsically disordered Phe-Gly nucleoporins (FG Nups) within nuclear pore complexes exert multivalent interactions with transport receptors (Karyopherins (Kaps)) that orchestrate nucleocytoplasmic transport. Current FG-centric views reason that selective Kap translocation is promoted by alterations in the barrier-like FG Nup conformations. However, the strong binding of Kaps with the FG Nups due to avidity contradicts rapid Kap translocation in vivo. Here, using surface plasmon resonance, we innovate a means to correlate in situ mechanistic (molecular occupancy and conformational changes) with equilibrium (binding affinity) and kinetic (multivalent binding kinetics) aspects of Karyopherinβ1 (Kapβ1) binding to four different FG Nups. A general feature of the FxFG domains of Nup214, Nup62, and Nup153 is their capacity to extend and accommodate large numbers of Kapβ1 molecules at physiological Kapβ1 concentrations. A notable exception is the GLFG domain of Nup98, which forms a partially penetrable cohesive layer. Interestingly, we find that a slowly exchanging Kapβ1 phase forms an integral constituent within the FG Nups that coexists with a fast phase, which dominates transport kinetics due to limited binding with the pre-occupied FG Nups at physiological Kapβ1 concentrations. Altogether, our data reveal an emergent Kap-centric barrier mechanism that may underlie mechanistic and kinetic control in the nuclear pore complex.
    Biophysical Journal 04/2014; 106(8):1751-62. DOI:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.021 · 3.97 Impact Factor
Show more