Beyond Research "on" Cultural Minorities: Challenges and Implications of Research as Situated Cultural Practice

Exceptional children (Impact Factor: 2.75). 12/2007; 74(3).


This article examines the cultural nature of research. This is a consequential idea as research knowledge is expected to inform professional practices for our increasingly multicultural society. We highlight theoretical and methodological limits of the traditional practice of research on cultural groups and outline research as situated cultural practice. This notion challenges researchers to widen the analytic spotlight from a focus on certain groups to shed light on two additional aspects, namely, the sociocultural location of the researcher as a cultural being and member of a scientific field, and the cultural presuppositions in a field's habitual practices. We outline a model of culture that underlies the idea of research as situated cultural practice. We illustrate this notion with quantitative and qualitative research examples and reflect on implications for future research. (Contains 1 table.)

Download full-text


Available from: Alfredo J. Artiles, Sep 21, 2014
  • Source
    • "This is an interesting consideration since it means that interventions could be conducted with high fidelity, but with weak ecological validity. 4 (Arzubiaga et al. 2008, 320). By the same token, children's " offstage " cultural activities may not be aligned either with the behaviors, skills, or practices ostensibly mapped in intervention protocols. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I critique in this article the construct of culture because of its centrality in creating the notion of difference, which has been commonly applied to marginalized populations. I examine critically how the notion of culture has been theorized in educational research as a means to obtain theoretical clarity in research design and reporting, as well as inform future policy and reform efforts. I reframe the idea of culture to transcend the favored focus on background markers and include institutional and social practices to expand the unit of analysis beyond stereotyped groups or individuals. This perspective will enable us to understand how the constructs of learning, ability, and culture get increasingly intertwined with damaging consequences that perpetuate historical injustices. I illustrate the framework with a critique of Response to Intervention (RTI) by outlining the ways in which the idea of culture has been taken up in this research. The proposed standpoint empowers us to rely on a view of culture that honors its dynamic, historical, and dialectical nature.
    Educational Review 01/2015; 67(1). DOI:10.1080/00131911.2014.934322 · 0.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Importantly, this pattern of overrepresentation does not occur in medically defined disability categories 2 (e.g., blind, deaf) (Harry and Klingner 2006). Therefore concern is significant when children of color are overrepresented in disability categories that rely on the judgment of adults, who may conflate differences with internal deficits (Arzubiaga et al. 2008). This conceptual framework of CRT and DisCrit provided several affordances. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, I empirically examined the dispositions of teachers in juvenile justice surrounding young women of color with disabilities to inform what improvements can be made in teacher education. I utilized Critical Race Theory (CRT) and focused on the tenet of whiteness as property as a lens to provide a robust racial analysis of the dispositions of teachers. Findings indicated that instead of a status that elicited support, ability became another thing to surveil, perpetuating a commitment to whiteness as property. An implication that arose directly from these findings was that teachers need training in understanding theories of race, racism, and inequities that recognize the historical legacy of whiteness as property. This training could lead to a change in teacher dispositions and practices that may disrupt the School to Prison Pipeline. The School to Prison Pipeline, or the Pipeline, has historically steered children out of school and into prisons (Advancement Project 2010). Through methods such as ticketing students for minor offenses, implementing disciplinary removal, and ''securing the environment'' through means such as metal detectors and fencing, schools funneled children of color into prisons (ACLU 2008; Kim et al. 2010). This criminalization of children of color illustrated what Fredrick Douglas (1883) called the American habit to ''impute crime to color''. Pipeline literature made explicit connections between race, criminalization, and education (Bahena et al. 2012). However, other social identity markers and their intersections with race marked children as more susceptible to the Pipeline.
    The Urban Review 06/2014; 47(2). DOI:10.1007/s11256-014-0293-6
  • Source
    • "To do this, we followed the framework for quality indicators of the experimental studies outlined in the aforementioned scholarly papers. Basing our argument and rubric items on the principle that research is itself a cultural practice (Arzubiaga et al., 2008), our ultimate goal is to provide a conceptual tool to enhance researchers' reflexivity during conceptualization, design, implementation, and dissemination of research. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Researchers and practitioners have struggled to promote optimal academic, behavioral, and postschool outcomes for historically marginalized youth from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. While there is a growing body of evidence-based interventions in special education, the extent to which these interventions are culturally responsive remains unexplored. Culturally responsive research (CRR) has gained increased attention in social sciences. The authors developed a 15-item rubric to evaluate the cultural responsiveness of research. They applied the rubric to six studies in transition education identified as high-quality intervention studies to determine the extent to which these met the criteria for CRR. Results from this analysis demonstrated that while none of the studies were indicative of CRR across all rubric items, strengths in question relevancy, sampling, participant description, and data collection strategies were noted.
    The Journal of Special Education 01/2014; 47:203-216. · 1.41 Impact Factor
Show more