Article

Hospital Remoteness And Thirty-Day Mortality From Three Serious Conditions

Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 11/2008; 27(6):1707-17. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1707
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rural U.S. communities face major challenges in ensuring the availability of high-quality health care. We examined whether hospital-specific, all-cause, thirty-day risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) following acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia varied by hospitals' geographic remoteness. We analyzed 2001-2003 Medicare administrative data, comparing RSMRs among hospitals located in urban, large rural, small rural, or remote small rural regions. We found only small mortality differences across remoteness regions for hospitalizations for the three conditions. We examine the implications of these findings for the millions of Americans who rely upon rural hospitals for their care.

0 Followers
 · 
55 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether there is an association between clinical decision support system (CDSS) use and quality disparities in pneumonia process indicators between rural and urban hospitals. Data were used from the FY 2009 American Hospital Association electronic health record (EHR) adoption survey (3,616 responding hospitals) to identify hospitals that used CDSS for clinical guidelines and reminders. This was linked to the 2009 Hospital Compare data set from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (3,805 reporting hospitals). The merged data set contained 2,405 hospitals: 1,330 were noncritical in metropolitan ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs), 692 were noncritical in rural ZCTAs, and there were 383 critical access hospitals (CAHs; 359 in rural ZCTAs, 24 in urban ZCTAs). The dependent variable was a pneumonia composite quality score, composed of 6 pneumonia process indicators calculated for each hospital. Adjusted analysis controlled for a hospital's propensity to use CDSS. While quality was lower in rural institutions, unadjusted pneumonia quality scores varied modestly, from 90.08% in CAHs to 93.38% in urban hospitals. Hospitals that used CDSS had higher unadjusted pneumonia process composite scores than their non-CDSS counterparts. After controlling for CDSS use, the propensity for CDSS use, and hospital and community characteristics, hospitals in rural ZCTAs did not have significantly different process composite scores than their metropolitan counterparts. CDSS was positively associated with quality of care for pneumonia. Adoption of EHRs with CDSS functionality in rural hospitals may serve to reduce quality gaps. Costs of EHR implementation may be a barrier to this process.
    The Journal of Rural Health 04/2014; 30(2):186-95. DOI:10.1111/jrh.12043 · 1.77 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the impact of the regionalised Integrated Cardiovascular Clinical Network (ICCNet) on 30-day mortality among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in an Australian rural setting. An integrated cardiac support network incorporating standardised risk stratification, point-of-care troponin testing and cardiologist-supported decision making was progressively implemented in non-metropolitan areas of South Australia from 2001 to 2008. Hospital administrative data and statewide death records from 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2010 were used to evaluate outcomes for patients diagnosed with MI in rural and metropolitan hospitals. Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality. 29 623 independent contiguous episodes of MI were identified. The mean predicted 30-day mortality was lower among rural patients compared with metropolitan patients, while actual mortality rates were higher (30-day mortality: rural, 705/5630 [12.52%] v metropolitan, 2140/23 993 [8.92%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.33-1.60; P< 0.001). After adjustment for temporal improvement in MI outcome, availability of immediate cardiac support was associated with a 22% relative odds reduction in 30-day mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.93; P= 0.007). A strong association between network support and transfer of patients to metropolitan hospitals was observed (before ICCNet, 1102/2419 [45.56%] v after ICCNet, 2100/3211 [65.4%]; P< 0.001), with lower mortality observed among transferred patients. Cardiologist-supported remote risk stratification, management and facilitated access to tertiary hospital-based early invasive management are associated with an improvement in 30-day mortality for patients who initially present to rural hospitals and are diagnosed with MI. These interventions closed the gap in mortality between rural and metropolitan patients in South Australia.
    The Medical journal of Australia 02/2014; 200(3):157-60. DOI:10.5694/mja13.10645 · 3.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Critical access hospitals (CAHs) provide inpatient care to Americans living in rural communities. These hospitals are at high risk of falling behind with respect to quality improvement, owing to their limited resources and vulnerable patient populations. How they have fared on patient outcomes during the past decade is unknown. To evaluate trends in mortality for patients receiving care at CAHs and compare these trends with those for patients receiving care at non-CAHs. Retrospective observational study using data from Medicare fee-for-service patients admitted to US acute care hospitals with acute myocardial infarction (1,902,586 admissions), congestive heart failure (4,488,269 admissions), and pneumonia (3,891,074 admissions) between 2002 and 2010. Trends in risk-adjusted 30-day mortality rates for CAHs and other acute care US hospitals. Accounting for differences in patient, hospital, and community characteristics, CAHs had mortality rates comparable with those of non-CAHs in 2002 (composite mortality across all 3 conditions, 12.8% vs 13.0%; difference, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.7% to 0.2%]; P = .25). Between 2002 and 2010, mortality rates increased 0.1% per year in CAHs but decreased 0.2% per year in non-CAHs, for an annual difference in change of 0.3% (95% CI, 0.2% to 0.3%; P < .001). Thus, by 2010, CAHs had higher mortality rates compared with non-CAHs (13.3% vs 11.4%; difference, 1.8% [95% CI, 1.4% to 2.2%]; P < .001). The patterns were similar when each individual condition was examined separately. Comparing CAHs with other small, rural hospitals, similar patterns were found. Among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia, 30-day mortality rates for those admitted to CAHs, compared with those admitted to other acute care hospitals, increased from 2002 to 2010. New efforts may be needed to help CAHs improve.
    JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association 04/2013; 309(13):1379-87. DOI:10.1001/jama.2013.2366 · 30.39 Impact Factor