MARKETWATCH Choosing The Best Hospital: The Limitations Of Public Quality Reporting

Tufts University School of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Affairs (Impact Factor: 4.64). 11/2008; 27(6):1680-7. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The call for accountability in health care quality has fueled the development of consumer-oriented Web sites that provide hospital ratings. Taking the consumer perspective, we compared five Web sites to assess the level of agreement in their rankings of local hospitals for four diagnoses. The sites assessed different measures of structure, process, and outcomes and did not use consistent patient definitions or reporting periods. Consequently, they failed to agree on hospital rankings within any diagnosis, even when using the same metric (such as mortality). In their current state, rating services appear likely to confuse, rather than inform, consumers.

  • BMJ quality & safety 02/2015; 24(2):95-9. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003934 · 3.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine if the Value-Based Purchasing Performance Scoring system correlates with hospital acquired condition quality indicators. This study utilizes the following secondary data sources: the American Hospital Association (AHA) annual survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing and Hospital Acquired Conditions databases. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to examine the effect of CMS total performance score on counts of hospital acquired conditions. Hospital structure variables including size, ownership, teaching status, payer mix, case mix, and location were utilized as control variables. The secondary data sources were merged into a single database using Stata 10. Total performance scores, which are used to determine if hospitals should receive incentive money, do not correlate well with quality outcome in the form of hospital acquired conditions. Value-based purchasing does not appear to correlate with improved quality and patient safety as indicated by Hospital Acquired Condition (HAC) scores. This leads us to believe that either the total performance score does not measure what it should, or the quality outcome measurements do not reflect the quality of the total performance scores measure. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Health Policy 10/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.003 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Twenty-seven years after the first public release by the U.S. government of data on the quality of hospital care, public reporting for consumers has expanded substantially. Despite the growth in public reporting activities, there is limited evidence of their use by consumers in ways that significantly affect health care delivery. Support for public reporting continues, in part, because of the face value of transparency. The limited impact of reporting efforts is plausibly due to flaws in the content, design, and implementation of existing public reports rather than inherent limitations of reporting. Substantial work is still needed for public reports to achieve their potential for engaging and informing consumers. We present a vision statement and 10 recommendations to achieve this potential.
    Medical Care Research and Review 05/2014; 71(5). DOI:10.1177/1077558714535980 · 2.57 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 17, 2014