Risk Factors for Diagnostic Delay in Acute Aortic Dissection

Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna and S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
The American journal of cardiology (Impact Factor: 3.43). 11/2008; 102(10):1399-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In acute aortic dissection (AAD), timely diagnosis is challenging. However, dedicated studies of the entity and determinants of delay are currently lacking. We surveyed pre-/in-hospital time to diagnosis and explored risk factors for diagnostic delay. We analyzed the dedicated database of a metropolitan AAD network (161 patients diagnosed since 1996; 115 Stanford type A) in terms of hospital arrival times (from pain to presentation at any hospital) and in-hospital diagnostic times (presentation to final diagnosis). Median (interquartile range) in-hospital diagnostic times were approximately twofold greater than hospital arrival times (177 minutes, 644, vs 75 minutes, 124, p = 0.0001, Wilcoxon test). Median annual in-hospital diagnostic times were most often approximately 3 hours (spread was wide, but decreased after 2001; rho = -0.94, p = 0.005). Risk factors (univariate analysis) for in-hospital diagnostic time >75th percentile (12 hours) included pleural effusion (odds ratio 3.96, 95% confidence interval 1.80 to 8.69), dyspneic presentation (odds ratio 3.33, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 8.59), and age <70 years (odds ratio 2.34, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 5.36). Systolic arterial pressure < or =105 mm Hg decreased the likelihood of lengthy diagnosis (odds ratio 0.08, 95% confidence interval 0.01 to 0.59). In patients (n = 82) with routine values (since 2000), troponin positivity (odds ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 11.84) and an acute coronary syndrome-like electrocardiogram (odds ratio 2.88, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 8.17) were also risk factors. In conclusion, in a metropolitan setting, most of the diagnostic delay may occur in hospital. At presentation, pleural effusion, troponin positivity, acute coronary syndrome-like electrocardiogram, and dyspnea are possible "clinical confounders" associated with particularly long in-hospital diagnostic times.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) assay is used in the diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with symptoms of myocardial infarction. This study was undertaken to establish an age-specific 99th percentile cutoff value for hs-cTnT in Chinese population, and to evaluate its potential for early prediction of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in middle-aged patients. Troponin T levels in blood obtained from healthy Chinese adults were assayed using hs-cTnT. The distribution was plotted and 99th percentiles were determined by nonparametric statistics. Prediction performance at the conventional cutoff (14 ng/L) recommended by the Roche company was compared with the age-specific cutoff for NSTEMI in 100 middle-aged patients (40-60 years of age) with acute chest pain. The 99th percentile for hs-cTnT was 14 ng/L for patients ≥60 years of age and 11 ng/L for those <60. Fifty of the 100 patients were finally diagnosed with NSTEMI. The age-specific 99th percentile cutoff value of 11 ng/L identified a higher number of patients with NSTEMI than the conventional 14 ng/L cutoff (46 vs. 40 patients), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.084). In addition, the sensitivity of hs-cTnT increased from 80 to 92% and the negative predictive values increased from 82.4 to 91.8%. Using 11 ng/L as a decision-making cutoff point for hs-cTnT facilitated earlier prediction of NSTEMI in middle-aged patients than the conventional 14 ng/L cutoff. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding in larger group of patients.
    Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 01/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.1002/jcla.21636 · 1.14 Impact Factor
  • Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 10/2013; DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2013.05.024 · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection often show ST-T abnormalities at presentation, the frequency and implication of such findings remain unclear. To clarify these points, admission electrocardiograms from 233 patients admitted ≤6 hours after symptom onset who underwent emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection were studied. The prevalence of electrocardiographic (ECG) patterns was 51% for ST-T abnormalities (4% for ST-segment elevation and 47% for ST-segment depression and/or negative T waves), 30% for normal ECG findings or no significant ST-T changes, and 19% for ECG confounders such as bundle branch block or left ventricular hypertrophy. Patients with ST-T abnormalities had higher prevalence of pericardial effusion (48% vs 9% and 38%), cardiac tamponade (28% vs 3% and 18%), moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (28% vs 7% and 18%), shock on admission (34% vs 3% and 13%), coronary ostial involvement (14% vs 1% and 2%), concomitant coronary artery bypass surgery (9% vs 1% and 0%), and in-hospital mortality (11% vs 1% and 4%) compared with patients with normal ECG findings or no significant ST-T changes and those who had ECG confounders (p <0.05 for all). On multivariate analysis, ST-T abnormalities were the only independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 3.87, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 14.7, p = 0.035). In conclusion, about 50% of patients who underwent emergency surgery for type A acute aortic dissection had ST-T abnormalities, characterized predominantly by ST-segment depression or negative T waves, in the acute phase. ST-T abnormalities were associated with more complicated features and independently predicted in-hospital death.
    The American journal of cardiology 05/2013; 112(3). DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.03.050 · 3.43 Impact Factor