Article
Transcatheter arterial embolization in gastric cancer patients with acute bleeding.
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea.
European Radiology (impact factor:
3.22).
12/2008;
19(4):960-5.
DOI:10.1007/s00330-008-1216-2
pp.960-5
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (2)
-
Article: Incidence and management of bleeding complications following percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a serious complication that sometimes occurs after percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG). We evaluated the incidence of bleeding complications after a PRG and its management including transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). We retrospectively reviewed 574 patients who underwent PRG in our institution between 2000 and 2010. Eight patients (1.4%) had symptoms or signs of upper GI bleeding after PRG. The initial presentation was hematemesis (n = 3), melena (n = 2), hematochezia (n = 2) and bloody drainage through the gastrostomy tube (n = 1). The time interval between PRG placement and detection of bleeding ranged from immediately after to 3 days later (mean: 28 hours). The mean decrease in hemoglobin concentration was 3.69 g/dL (range, 0.9 to 6.8 g/dL). In three patients, bleeding was controlled by transfusion (n = 2) or compression of the gastrostomy site (n = 1). The remaining five patients underwent an angiography because bleeding could not be controlled by transfusion only. In one patient, the bleeding focus was not evident on angiography or endoscopy, and wedge resection including the tube insertion site was performed for hemostasis. The other four patients underwent prophylactic (n = 1) or therapeutic (n = 3) TAEs. In three patients, successful hemostasis was achieved by TAE, whereas the remaining one patient underwent exploration due to persistent bleeding despite TAE. We observed an incidence of upper GI bleeding complicating the PRG of 1.4%. TAE following conservative management appears to be safe and effective for hemostasis.Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society 03/2012; 13(2):174-81. · 1.32 Impact Factor -
Article: Recent update of embolization of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is a frequent complication with significant morbidity and mortality. Although endoscopic hemostasis remains the initial treatment modality, severe bleeding despite endoscopic management occurs in 5-10% of patients, necessitating surgery or interventional embolotherapy. Endovascular embolotherapy is now considered the first-line therapy for massive UGI bleeding that is refractory to endoscopic management. Interventional radiologists need to be familiar with the choice of embolic materials, technical aspects of embolotherapy, and the factors affecting the favorable or unfavorable outcomes after embolotherapy for UGI bleeding.Korean journal of radiology: official journal of the Korean Radiological Society 01/2012; 13 Suppl 1:S31-9. · 1.32 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
1 month
1 month post procedure
12 patients
23 patients
30-day mortality rate
clinical effectiveness
clinical success rate
contrast extravasation
eight active
embolization procedures
immediate hemostasis
initial clinical success
negative angiographic findings
partial splenic infarction
procedure-related complications
remaining eight patients
signs
transcatheter arterial embolization
tumor staining
unresectable gastric cancer