Objective versus subjective assessment of oral medication adherence in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Center for the Promotion of Treatment Adherence and Self-Management, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, USA.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (Impact Factor: 5.48). 01/2009; 15(4):589-93. DOI: 10.1002/ibd.20798
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective was to examine the prevalence and frequency of oral medication nonadherence using a multimethod assessment approach consisting of objective, subjective, and biological data in adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Medication adherence was assessed via pill counts, patient/parent interview, and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN)/6-methylmercaptopurine nucleotide (6-MMPN) metabolite bioassay in 42 adolescents with IBD. Pediatric gastroenterologists provided disease severity assessments.
The objective nonadherence prevalence was 64% for 6-MP/azathioprine (AZA) and 88% for 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) medications, whereas subjective nonadherence prevalence was 10% for 6-MP/AZA and 2% for 5-ASA. The objective nonadherence frequency was 38% for 6-MP/AZA and 49% for 5-ASA medications, and subjective nonadherence frequency was 6% for 6-MP/AZA and 3% for 5-ASA. The bioassay data revealed that only 14% of patients had therapeutic 6-TGN levels.
The results indicate that objectively measured medication nonadherence prevalence is consistent with that observed in other pediatric chronic illness populations, and that objective nonadherence frequency is considerable, with 40%-50% of doses missed by patients. Subjective assessments appeared to overestimate adherence. Bioassay adherence data, while compromised by pharmacokinetic variation, might be useful as a cursory screener for nonadherence with follow-up objective assessment. Nonadherence in 1 medication might also indicate nonadherence in other medications. Clinical implications and future research directions are provided.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To review and critically evaluate the extant research literature pertaining to adherence in youth and adults with headache and to provide recommendations for future research.Background This article provides the first systematic review of pediatric headache adherence and updates a previous review of treatment adherence in adults with headache.DesignSystematic review of empirical literature.MethodsA literature search with no date restriction was conducted using PubMed and PsycINFO electronic databases and bibliographies of relevant articles.ResultsAdherence rates in adults with headache range considerably from 25% to 94% across treatment, assessment method, and definition of adherence utilized. Methods to assess adherence included retrospective prescription claims data, paper or electronic diaries, follow-up appointment attendance, written and verbal self-report of general adherence, verbal self-report of adherence over a specific amount of time via in person interview or telephone, validated adherence measures, adherence questionnaires without validation, and counselor ratings of homework. Each methodology and assessment tool demonstrated strengths and weaknesses. No studies have systematically examined medication adherence in children with headache, and the few available studies examining adherence to behavioral treatment have documented adherence rates ranging from 52% to 86%.Conclusions Adherence research in adults with headache is growing, but studies demonstrate a number of methodological shortcomings. Adherence research in children with headache, and adherence intervention research in both adults and children, is scant. Future research should use objective measures of adherence, consider over-the-counter medications and medication overuse, examine demographic, psychological, and behavioral correlates of adherence, assess adherence to botulinum toxin type A, and examine the efficacy of adherence interventions in individuals with headache.
    Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain 05/2014; 54(5). DOI:10.1111/head.12353 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the effectiveness of thiopurines in maintaining steroid-free remission in routine clinical practice.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With advances in medical care, youths with chronic illness have the potential for higher quality of life; however, these treatments often come with cost (i.e., burden, financial) that can result in nonadherence. Pediatric nonadherence, on average, is approximately 50% across chronic health conditions. Research has identified effective, evidence-based assessment measures and intervention strategies to promote regimen adherence in youths. Yet, these measures and strategies typically are designed for clinical trials and thus may not be feasible or practical in typical clinic settings. As the field of adherence assessment and intervention expands, it will be important to devise evidence-based tools that are pragmatic and can be translated easily into practice. To guide this future direction, the goals of this paper are to review evidence-based adherence assessment and intervention strategies that can be used with youths and families in clinical practice, to illustrate the complexities of addressing adherence concerns in routine practice, and to discuss the challenges of disseminating and implementing evidence-based strategies in the real world. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved)
    09/2014; Vol 2(3):322-336. DOI:10.1037/cpp0000066

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 26, 2014