Hysteropexy. A review

Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Minerva ginecologica 01/2009; 60(6):509-28.
Source: PubMed


Uterine prolapse is a common problem in women that negatively affects one's quality of life. Surgical treatment commonly involves a hysterectomy followed by vaginal vault suspension of some type. Hysteropexy to treat uterovaginal prolapse has a long history dating back to the 1800s and has gone through many changes. Recent literature describes vaginal, open abdominal and laparoscopic approaches. Vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy is well-supported by the scientific literature. Favorable postoperative outcomes range from 62-100% and additional data show improved quality of life and sexual function. Anatomic outcomes appear to be comparable to vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament vault suspension. Additionally, encouraging outcomes following pregnancy have been described. The sacrohysteropexy, performed through a laparotomy incision or laparoscopically, also has favorable data, with cure rates ranging from 91-100%. Studies supporting this procedure also describe improvements in quality of life and sexual function. Complications related to these procedures are similar to those described after vaginal vault suspension using comparable techniques, although most studies report shorter operative times and less blood loss. At the present time, hysteropexy, either transvaginal or abdominal, seems to be a safe procedure with acceptable results in women who desire uterine preservation. As these procedures gain popularity and data become available, questions related to patient selection, surgical durability, outcomes following pregnancy, and complications related to risk of uterine pathology will likely be answered.

62 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achondroplasia is an autosomal-dominant disorder resulting in short-limbed dwarfism. Limited data exist regarding the management of pelvic organ prolapse in women with achondroplasia. A young nulligravid woman with stage IV uterovaginal prolapse desired surgical correction of her prolapse with uterine preservation. The severity of her prolapse, profound cervical elongation, and distortion of the bony pelvis presented surgical challenges. She underwent abdominal lumbohysteropexy with polypropylene mesh. At 1 year postoperative, she has marked improvement in symptoms and objective findings. Abdominal lumbohysteropexy appears to be an effective surgical approach in women with achondroplasia desiring uterine preservation.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 08/2010; 116 Suppl 2(Supplement):531-3. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e6df79 · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the operative and postoperative outcomes of anterior abdominal wall cervicopexy (AWC) for treatment of stage III and stage IV uterine prolapse. AWC was performed by anchoring the supravaginal cervix to the anterior abdominal wall. This was done following obliteration of the pouch of Douglas via laparotomy. Among 37 patients, AWC was performed in 21 women with stage III and 16 women with stage IV uterine prolapse. Overcorrection was observed in 3 women. Postoperatively, 2 women experienced febrile morbidity and 5 had urinary retention. Thirteen women complained of urinary frequency, but all reported improvement at 3-month follow up. Among 24 women who became pregnant, 14 delivered vaginally, 5 delivered by cesarean, and 5 had an ongoing pregnancy. Four recurrences occurred: 2 stage II and 2 stage III prolapses. Three of these women had delivered by cesarean, while the fourth recurrence occurred after the patient's third vaginal birth. AWC is a simple and effective procedure to treat stage III and stage IV uterine prolapse. However, some surgical modifications and more studies are required to ascertain its validity.
    International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 08/2010; 110(2):130-2. DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.025 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Attitudes to sexuality and the psychological value of reproductive organs have changed in Western countries over the last few decades. Nevertheless, repair of pelvic support defects with concomitant hysterectomy is still considered the standard treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Over the last 10 years, however, interest has been growing in uterus-sparing surgery, which can be divided into vaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic procedures. The majority of studies on uterus-sparing surgery, with the exception of abdominal techniques, report few cases with short follow-up. Sacrospinous hysteropexy is the most studied vaginal technique for uterus preservation and favorable results have been demonstrated, although the majority of studies are flawed by selection and information bias, short follow-up and lack of adequate control groups. Abdominal and laparoscopic procedures are promising, providing similar functional and anatomical results to hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Consensus is growing that the uterus can be preserved at the time of pelvic reconstructive surgery in appropriately selected women who desire it. The results of comparison trials and prospective studies confirm that uterus-sparing surgery is feasible and is associated with similar outcomes to hysterectomy, as well as shorter operating times. Surgeons should be ready to respond to the wishes of female patients who want to preserve vaginal function and the uterus.
    Nature Reviews Urology 11/2010; 7(11):626-33. DOI:10.1038/nrurol.2010.164 · 4.84 Impact Factor
Show more