Mortality and Morbidity by Month of Birth of Neonates Admitted to an Academic Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35249, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 11/2008; 122(5):e1048-52. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-0412
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinical expertise and skill of pediatric housestaff improve over the academic year, and performance varies despite supervision by faculty neonatologists. It is possible that variation in clinical expertise of housestaff affects important clinical outcomes in infants in ICUs.
Our goal was to test the hypothesis that there is a decrease in morbidity and mortality in infants admitted to an NICU over the course of the academic year.
A retrospective analysis was conducted using data on infants with birthweight 401 to 1500 g and >or=24 weeks' gestation (n = 3445) and infants with birth weights >1500 g (n = 7840) admitted to a regional NICU from January 1991 to June 2004. All infants were cared for by pediatric and neonatal housestaff supervised by neonatologists. Analysis of mortality and morbidity (intraventricular hemorrhage grades 3-4/periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis >or= Bell stage 2, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia) over time were performed by repeated measures analysis of variance and the chi(2) test.
Mortality rate in the 401 to 1500 g cohort, as well as the >1500 g cohort did not decrease over time during the academic year and was similar between the first (July-December) and second (January-June) halves of the academic year. There were no differences noted over the academic year for any of the morbidities.
Morbidity and mortality in infants admitted to an academic NICU did not change significantly over the academic year. These observations suggest that the quality of care of critically ill neonates is not decreased early in the academic year.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a natureza e tendência dos artigos na temática saúde do recém nascido de bai-xo peso. Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa desenvolvida em agosto de 2009, a partir dos descritores: "recém-nascido de baixo peso" or "recém-nascido de muito baixo peso" and "unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal", no recorte temporal 1990-2008. A amostra de 608 resumos foi submetida à análise de conteúdo temática. Nos resul-tados, os estudos de natureza clínico-epidemiológica contemplam os fatores de risco do baixo peso e morbimor-talidade neonatal e os de tendência assistencial contribuem com as rotinas e cuidados prestados. Evidenciam-se os avanços na atenção a saúde do recém-nascido, a complexidade clínica e as implicações para sua assistência. Des-taca-se a lacuna de pesquisas que aponte a subjetividade, o apoio e a inclusão das famílias nos cuidados e no en-frentamento dessa situação. Descritores: Recém-nascido de baixo peso. Recém-nascido de muito baixo peso. Unidades de terapia intensiva neonatal.
    01/2010; 31(3). DOI:10.1590/S1983-14472010000300024
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The "July phenomenon" refers to a purported worsening of outcomes in teaching-hospital patients with the arrival of new, inexperienced house-staff. Previous quantitative studies of new house-staff and increased mortality have been limited primarily by a focused patient population and the use of limited data to adjust for severity of patient illness. We included all medicine, surgical, and obstetrical patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Ontario, Canada between April 15, 2004 and December 31, 2008. We calculated the ratio of observed to expected weekly number of deaths in hospital. The expected number of deaths was calculated using a validated, discriminative, and well-calibrated multivariate survival model. Collective house-staff experience was modeled from a minimum on July 1st to a maximum on June 30th using five distinct patterns. We studied 259,748 encounters that included 164,318 people. The mortality rate was 3.0%. The ratio of observed to expected number of weekly deaths was not associated with collective house-staff experience, irrespective of the pattern in which it was modeled. The lack of association between risk of death in hospital and house-staff experience did not vary by admission type (urgent vs elective) or specialty (medicine vs surgery). At our hospital, we found no association between the arrival of new house-staff and the adjusted risk of death in hospital. These data, along with the results of the vast majority of previous studies in this field, make the existence of the "July Phenomenon" for inpatient mortality extremely unlikely.
    Journal of Hospital Medicine 09/2011; 6(7):389-94. DOI:10.1002/jhm.917 · 2.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Residents are vital to the clinical workforce of today and tomorrow. Although in training to become specialists, they also provide much of the daily patient care. Residency training aims to prepare residents to provide a high quality of care. It is essential to assess the patient outcome aspects of residency training, to evaluate the effect or impact of global investments made in training programs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effects of relevant aspects of residency training on patient outcomes. The literature was searched from December 2004 to February 2011 using MEDLINE, Cochrane, Embase and the Education Resources Information Center databases with terms related to residency training and (post) graduate medical education and patient outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, complications, length of stay and patient satisfaction. Included studies evaluated the impact of residency training on patient outcomes. Ninety-seven articles were included from 182 full-text articles of the initial 2,001 hits. All studies were of average or good quality and the majority had an observational study design. Ninety-six studies provided insight into the effect of 'the level of experience of residents' on patient outcomes during residency training. Within these studies, the start of the academic year was not without risk (five out of 19 studies), but individual progression of residents (seven studies) as well as progression through residency training (nine out of 10 studies) had a positive effect on patient outcomes. Compared with faculty, residents' care resulted mostly in similar patient outcomes when dedicated supervision and additional operation time were arranged for (34 out of 43 studies). After new, modified or improved training programs, patient outcomes remained unchanged or improved (16 out of 17 studies). Only one study focused on physicians' prior training site when assessing the quality of patient care. In this study, training programs were ranked by complication rates of their graduates, thus linking patient outcomes back to where physicians were trained. The majority of studies included in this systematic review drew attention to the fact that patient care appears safe and of equal quality when delivered by residents. A minority of results pointed to some negative patient outcomes from the involvement of residents. Adequate supervision, room for extra operation time, and evaluation of and attention to the individual competence of residents throughout residency training could positively serve patient outcomes. Limited evidence is available on the effect of residency training on later practice. Both qualitative and quantitative research designs are needed to clarify which aspects of residency training best prepare doctors to deliver high quality care.
    BMC Medicine 06/2012; 10:65. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-10-65 · 7.28 Impact Factor