Article

Integrating Peer-Provided Services: A Quasi-experimental Study of Recovery Orientation, Confidence, and Empowerment

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 1.99). 12/2008; 59(11):1307-14. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.59.11.1307
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Peer-provided mental health services have become increasingly prominent in recent years, despite a lack of evidence of beneficial impact. The study presented here compared the effectiveness of the Vet-to-Vet program, a peer education and support program, and standard care without peer support on measures of recovery orientation, confidence, and empowerment.
Participants were recruited in two consecutive cohorts between 2002 and 2006, one before the implementation of the Vet-to-Vet program in June 2002 (cohort 1; N=78) and one after (cohort 2; N=218). Follow-up interviews were conducted at one, three, and nine months. There were few baseline differences between the cohorts. Intention-to-treat analyses compared cohorts on changes over time on measures of recovery orientation, confidence, and empowerment. A third cohort (cohort 2-V) was constructed that consisted of the subset of participants from the second cohort who directly participated in more than ten Vet-to-Vet sessions since the last research interview (N=102). Comparisons between this cohort and the first cohort constitute as-treated analyses.
In the intention-to-treat analyses, the Vet-to-Vet cohort scored significantly higher on measures of empowerment. In the as-treated analyses, significant differences favoring the Vet-to-Vet cohort were observed on both empowerment and confidence. Secondary analyses of clinical measures showed significant differences favoring the cohorts 2 and 2-V on measures of functioning and on alcohol use.
These data suggest that participation in peer support may enhance personal well-being, as measured by both recovery-oriented and more traditional clinical measures.

1 Follower
 · 
133 Views
  • Source
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: For contemporary mental health policy to realise its commitment to enhance consumer participation and to promote the establishment of progressive mental health service delivery, progressing robust and effective roles for people with a lived experience of significant mental health challenges is essential. However, the emergent lived experience workforce in Australia faces a vast range of barriers including a lack of formal employment structures and awards, professional defensiveness from non-lived experience colleagues and stigma and discrimination in the workplace. Previously, there has been limited focused inquiry into the experience of employment for lived experience practitioners. The aim of this research is to provide a comprehensive exploration of the perspectives of lived experience practitioners of their employment within the mental health workforce, with a specific emphasis on factors that assist and inhibit the roles. Using a grounded theory approach, in-depth semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted. Lived experience practitioners employed in diverse roles within government, non-government and lived experience-run services from metropolitan, regional and rural settings across several states participated. Employing constant comparative analysis, the substantive theory Risk to self, resulting from stigma (seen and unseen) impacting on the LEP role emerged. Stigma, both seen and unseen was found to underlie and impact upon the LEP experience. As a result lived experience practitioners knowingly risked themselves and their own well-being within roles for the benefit of current mental health consumers. When workplaces were perceived as including greater supportive factors and were seen as less stigmatising, there was a correspondingly lower risk to LEP and greater consumer benefits. Conversely when more inhibiting factors existed, greater risk to LEP was posed and less consumer benefits occurred. For lived experience roles to evolve into full potentiality; to the benefit of mental health consumers and the well-being of LEP, the underlying stigma that is often ‘unseen’ must be recognised and addressed and supportive factors enhanced. The findings of this study will inform the on-going development of policy, service design and education of the professional and lived experience workforce, by identifying existing barriers, providing a framework to increase positive factors and ultimately contribute to a more collaborative, inclusive and therefore effective workplace culture for lived experience practitioners.
  • British Journal of Social Work 04/2011; 42(3):443-460. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcr076 · 1.19 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous literature has highlighted a number of concerns about forensic care and rehabilitation by those who use the services. The Good Lives Model (GLM) is a strength-based, humanistic approach to offender rehabilitation that has been largely overlooked by forensic mental health practitioners. This study explored the impact of a brief GLM program on forensic service users' perceptions of rehabilitation, both within and beyond therapeutic programs, using a thematically linked, multiple-case study research design. Pre-post comparisons of participants' perceptions of rehabilitation suggested three different outcomes: definite change, subtle change, and no change. Possible factors associated with participants' divergent experiences included level of exposure to the GLM, readiness to change, and practitioners' adherence to the GLM and experience with the model. The importance of attending to the wider system for successful implementation of this innovative approach is highlighted. © The Author(s) 2015.
    International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 02/2015; DOI:10.1177/0306624X15570027 · 0.84 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
8 Downloads
Available from