Cytokine-Induced Signaling Networks Prioritize Dynamic Range over Signal Strength

Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Center for Cell Decision Processes, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Cell (Impact Factor: 32.24). 11/2008; 135(2):343-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.034
Source: PubMed


Signaling networks respond to diverse stimuli, but how the state of the signaling network is relayed to downstream cellular responses is unclear. We modeled how incremental activation of signaling molecules is transmitted to control apoptosis as a function of signal strength and dynamic range. A linear relationship between signal input and response output, with the dynamic range of signaling molecules uniformly distributed across activation states, most accurately predicted cellular responses. When nonlinearized signals with compressed dynamic range relay network activation to apoptosis, we observe catastrophic, stimulus-specific prediction failures. We develop a general computational technique, "model-breakpoint analysis," to analyze the mechanism of these failures, identifying new time- and stimulus-specific roles for Akt, ERK, and MK2 kinase activity in apoptosis, which were experimentally verified. Dynamic range is rarely measured in signal-transduction studies, but our experiments using model-breakpoint analysis suggest it may be a greater determinant of cell fate than measured signal strength.

Download full-text


Available from: Hans Christian Reinhardt,
15 Reads
  • Source
    • "Collectively, these studies provide a dramatic simplification for large-scale data acquisition, because relative quantification of signalling is much more easily obtained than absolute quantification (Albeck et al., 2006; Bajikar and Janes, 2012). They also reinforce the added value of monitoring network responses to perturbations as opposed to simple measurements of the baseline signalling state (Irish et al., 2004; Irish et al., 2006; Janes et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computational models of cell signalling are perceived by many biologists to be prohibitively complicated. Why do math when you can simply do another experiment? Here, we explain how conceptual models, which have been formulated mathematically, have provided insights that directly advance experimental cell biology. In the past several years, models have influenced the way we talk about signalling networks, how we monitor them, and what we conclude when we perturb them. These insights required wet-lab experiments but would not have arisen without explicit computational modelling and quantitative analysis. Today, the best modellers are cross-trained investigators in experimental biology who work closely with collaborators but also undertake experimental work in their own laboratories. Biologists would benefit by becoming conversant in core principles of modelling in order to identify when a computational model could be a useful complement to their experiments. Although the mathematical foundations of a model are useful to appreciate its strengths and weaknesses, they are not required to test or generate a worthwhile biological hypothesis computationally.
    Journal of Cell Science 05/2013; 126(Pt 9):1913-1921. DOI:10.1242/jcs.112045 · 5.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A complementary time-interval stepwise regression technique implicates a specific role for ERK in the G1/S cell-fate decision point following DNA damage Because PLSR is constrained to incorporate all of the signaling and response data into a final model, large amounts of co-variation between measurements, and 'noise' from noncontributory signals, can obscure or over-predict signal– response relationships (Janes et al, 2008). Given these possibilities, the paradoxical role for ERK in G1 cell-cycle arrest and induction of programmed cell death suggested by PLSR was suspect. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Following DNA damage, cells display complex multi-pathway signaling dynamics that connect cell-cycle arrest and DNA repair in G1, S, or G2/M phase with phenotypic fate decisions made between survival, cell-cycle re-entry and proliferation, permanent cell-cycle arrest, or cell death. How these phenotypic fate decisions are determined remains poorly understood, but must derive from integrating genotoxic stress signals together with inputs from the local microenvironment. To investigate this in a systematic manner, we undertook a quantitative time-resolved cell signaling and phenotypic response study in U2OS cells receiving doxorubicin-induced DNA damage in the presence or absence of TNFα co-treatment; we measured key nodes in a broad set of DNA damage signal transduction pathways along with apoptotic death and cell-cycle regulatory responses. Two relational modeling approaches were then used to identify network-level relationships between signals and cell phenotypic events: a partial least squares regression approach and a complementary new technique which we term 'time-interval stepwise regression.' Taken together, the results from these analysis methods revealed complex, cytokine-modulated inter-relationships among multiple signaling pathways following DNA damage, and identified an unexpected context-dependent role for Erk in both G1/S arrest and apoptotic cell death following treatment with this commonly used clinical chemotherapeutic drug.
    Molecular Systems Biology 01/2012; 8(1):568. DOI:10.1038/msb.2012.1 · 10.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This may be due to differences in electrotransfer efficiency or expression of the constructs, which are contained within different plasmid vectors. It is likely that relatively small reductions in expression are capable of adversely affecting the signalling threshold of the PI3- kinase pathway, although large degrees of OE have relatively more limited effects on a percentage change basis, due to limitations in the dynamic range of the pathway (Hoehn et al. 2008, Janes et al. 2008). The effect of APPL1 shRNA administration to also reduce APPL2 protein is intriguing. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: APPL1 is an adaptor protein that binds to both AKT and adiponectin receptors and is hypothesised to mediate the effects of adiponectin in activating downstream effectors such as AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). We aimed to establish whether APPL1 plays a physiological role in mediating glycogen accumulation and insulin sensitivity in muscle and the signalling pathways involved. In vivo electrotransfer of cDNA- and shRNA-expressing constructs was used to over-express or silence APPL1 for 1 week in single tibialis cranialis muscles of rats. Resulting changes in glucose and lipid metabolism and signalling pathway activation were investigated under basal conditions and in high-fat diet (HFD)- or chow-fed rats under hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp conditions. APPL1 over-expression (OE) caused an increase in glycogen storage and insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in muscle, accompanied by a modest increase in glucose uptake. Glycogen synthesis during the clamp was reduced by HFD but normalised by APPL1 OE. These effects are likely explained by APPL1 OE-induced increase in basal and insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of IRS1, AKT, GSK3β and TBC1D4. On the contrary, APPL1 OE, such as HFD, reduced AMPK and acetyl-CoA carboxylase phosphorylation and PPARγ coactivator-1α and uncoupling protein 3 expression. Furthermore, APPL1 silencing caused complementary changes in glycogen storage and phosphorylation of AMPK and PI3-kinase pathway intermediates. Thus, APPL1 may provide a means for crosstalk between adiponectin and insulin signalling pathways, mediating the insulin-sensitising effects of adiponectin on muscle glucose disposal. These effects do not appear to require AMPK. Activation of signalling mediated via APPL1 may be beneficial in overcoming muscle insulin resistance.
    Journal of Endocrinology 07/2011; 210(1):81-92. DOI:10.1530/JOE-11-0039 · 3.72 Impact Factor
Show more