Article

Predictors of change in postmerger identification during a merger process: a longitudinal study.

School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, England.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (Impact Factor: 5.08). 12/2008; 95(5):1095-112. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1095
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Adopting an intergroup perspective, the authors examined predictors of change in postmerger identification throughout a merger. Data were collected over 3 points of measurement from 157 students of a newly merged university. The 1st questionnaire was distributed 4 months after the implementation of the merger; the following 2 were distributed 6 months and 1 year thereafter. With its longitudinal design, this study replicates and extends past results by revealing predictors of change in organizational identification for members of the dominant and subordinate organizations throughout a merger process. As predicted, postmerger identification increased only slowly for members of both the dominant and the subordinate organizations. Multilevel models for change confirmed that the predictive effect of premerger identification on postmerger identification for members of the dominant organization dissipates over time. The effect of in-group typicality unexpectedly varied as a function of organizational membership and was stable over time. Perceived fairness in the merger process positively influenced postmerger identification across members of both organizations; over time the effect of fairness amplified.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
353 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, we present an overview of the literatures on organizational identity and organizational identification. We provide overviews of four major approaches to organizational identity: functionalist, social constructionist, psychodynamic, and postmodern. The literature on organizational identification, by contrast, exhibits greater consensus due to the hegemonic power of social identity theory, and is predominantly functionalist. We review recent research on organizational identification regarding performance outcomes and antecedents (mainly focusing on leadership and the social exchange perspective), and in relation to change and virtual contexts. Some suggestions for further research are then offered. Finally an overview of the articles in this special issue is presented.
    Group & Organization Management 02/2013; 38(1):3-35. · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Using a person-situation perspective we explain what happens to individuals’ identification with a collective in the context of a change. We propose that given the anxiety that often emerges during change, individuals’ personal values (conservation and openness to change) interact with type of change (imposed versus voluntary) in predicting identification following change.Method In a pilot, longitudinal field, study (N=61, 67% female) of an imposed university campus relocation we measured employees’ values, and identification with the university before and several months after the relocation. In two lab experiments (Study 1: N=104, 91.3% female; Study 2: N=113 75.2% female) we manipulated a change to be either imposed or voluntary and compared the relationships between values and identification across types of change. In Study 2 we also measured anxiety from the change.FindingsWhen change was imposed (all three studies), but not when voluntary (Studies 1 & 2), individuals’ conservation was positively, and openness negatively, related to individuals’ post-change identification. The effects emerged only for individuals who experienced change-related anxiety (Study 2).Conclusions Individuals’ identification with a changing collective depends on the amount of anxiety change elicits and on the particular combination of their values and type of change.
    Journal of Personality 05/2014; · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social identity and identity theories have recently emerged as an important theoretical lens in relationship marketing research. However, the study of identity-motivated marketing relationships, defined as internal and external stakeholders’ identification with a marketing entity that can be an individual, a group, a brand, or a company, is not without controversies. Following a synthesis of this stream of research, this paper reviews the nature and causes of two key issues surrounding the conceptualization and measurement identity-based constructs. Recommended solutions and avenues for further research are then discussed.
    AMS Review. 12/2012; 2(2-4).

Full-text

Download
97 Downloads
Available from
Jun 2, 2014