Intrapartum Heart Rate Ambiguity: A Comparison of Cardiotocogram and Abdominal Fetal Electrocardiogram with Maternal Electrocardiogram

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation (Impact Factor: 1.7). 01/2013; 75(2). DOI: 10.1159/000345059
Source: PubMed


Objective/Aims: To investigate the presence of signal ambiguity of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring during delivery by comparing simultaneous cardiotocogram (CTG), abdominal fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) with continuous maternal ECG. Methods: A total of 144 simultaneous CTG (Corometrics(©) 250 series), abdominal fetal ECG (Monica AN24™) and maternal ECG (Monica AN24™) recordings were evaluated. Main Outcome Measures: When the FHR is within 5 bpm of the maternal heart rate (MHR) acquired from the ECG, it is classified as 'MHR/FHR ambiguity'. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher's exact test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Comparison of abdominal fetal ECG against CTG demonstrates significantly less 'MHR/FHR ambiguity' in both the first stage (mean 0.70 vs. 1.22%, p < 0.001) and second stage of labour (mean 3.30 vs. 6.20%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Intrapartum FHR monitoring in daily practice via the CTG modality provides significantly more 'MHR/FHR ambiguity' than abdominal fetal ECG, which also provides additional information on the MHR.

24 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review discusses the alternative of using the non-invasive foetal ECG compared with the conventionally used Doppler CTG. Non-invasive abdominal electrocardiograms (ECG) have been approved for clinical routine since 2008; subsequently they were also approved for antepartum and subpartum procedures. The first study results have been published. Non-invasive foetal ECG is especially indicated during early pregnancy, while the Doppler CTG is recommended for the vernix period. Beyond the vernix period no difference has been recorded in the success rate of either approach. The foetal ECG signal quality is independent of the BMI, whereas the success rate of the Doppler CTG is diminished with an increased BMI. During the first stage of labour, non-invasive foetal ECG demonstrates better signal quality; however during the second stage of labour no difference has been identified between the methods.
    Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 03/2012; 72(3):211-214. DOI:10.1055/s-0031-1298329 · 0.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Recently, a non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram monitor has been approved for clinical usage in labour and delivery. To determine the fetal signal quality of vaginal breech deliveries in comparison with a case-controlled cephalic group during labour. Study design: This case-control study was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University Hospital Frankfurt between 1st July 2012 and 30th September 2012. A total of seven breech deliveries were evaluated. A case-controlled cephalic group with same gestational age and parity were selected from a previous trial. Results: During first stage of labour, vaginal breech and cephalic delivery had no significant different fetal signal success rates (mean 87.8 vs. 85.7 %; p > 0.05). There was a trend of higher fetal signal success rates in the vaginal breech delivery group during second stage of labour (78.4 vs. 55.4 %; p = 0.08). Conclusion: Similar fetal signal success rates in vaginal breech delivery in comparison to cephalic presentation were demonstrated using the new commercially available non-invasive abdominal fECG device (the Monica AN24(TM)).
    Archives of Gynecology 04/2013; 288(5). DOI:10.1007/s00404-013-2860-6 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is important that professionals using electronic fetal monitoring are aware of various aspects regarding interpretation and clinical value of the trace. In practice, there are some typical misunderstandings and mistakes, which can lead to unexpected and sometimes adverse outcomes. One of the most frequent errors is the recording of maternal blood vessel pulsation (maternal insertion), instead of the fetal heart. In this article, a case of maternal insertion is presented and implications for practice are discussed.
    British Journal of Midwifery 03/2014; 22(3):162-166. DOI:10.12968/bjom.2014.22.3.162
Show more