Article

A National Emergency Airway Registry for Children: Landscape of Tracheal Intubation in 15 PICUs.

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA. 2 Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA. 3 Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke Children's Hospital, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. 4 Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 01/2013; DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182746736
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES:: To characterize the landscape of process of care and safety outcomes for tracheal intubation across pediatric intensive care units BACKGROUND:: Procedural process of care and safety outcomes of tracheal intubation across pediatric intensive care units has not been described. We hypothesize that the novel National Emergency Airway Registry for Children registry is a feasible tool to capture tracheal intubation process of care and outcomes. DESIGN:: Prospective, descriptive. SETTING:: Fifteen academic PICUs in North America. PATIENTS:: Critically ill children requiring tracheal intubation in PICUs. INTERVENTIONS:: Tracheal intubation quality improvement data were prospectively collected for all initial tracheal intubation in 15 PICUs from July 2010 to December 2011 using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children tool with explicit site-specific compliance plans and operational definitions including adverse tracheal intubation associated events. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS:: One thousand seven hundred fifteen tracheal intubation encounters were reported (averaging 1/3.4 days, or 1/86 bed days). Ninety-eight percent of primary tracheal intubation were successful; 86% were successful with less than or equal to two attempts. First attempt was by pediatric residents in 23%, pediatric critical care fellows in 41%, and critical care attending physicians in 13%: first attempt success rate was 62%, first provider success rate was 79%. The first method was oral intubation in 1,659 (98%) and nasal in 55 (2%). Direct laryngoscopy was used in 96%. Ninety percent of tracheal intubation were with cuffed tracheal tubes. Adverse tracheal intubation associated events were reported in 20% of intubations (n = 372), with severe tracheal intubation associated events in 6% (n = 115). Esophageal intubation with immediate recognition was the most common tracheal intubation associated events (n = 167, 9%). History of difficult airway, diagnostic category, unstable hemodynamics, and resident provider as first airway provider were associated with occurrence of tracheal intubation associated events. Severe tracheal intubation associated events were associated with diagnostic category and pre-existing unstable hemodynamics. Elective tracheal intubation status was associated with fewer severe tracheal intubation associated events. CONCLUSIONS:: National Emergency Airway Registry for Children was feasible to characterize PICU tracheal intubation procedural process of care and safety outcomes. Self-reported adverse tracheal intubation associated events occurred frequently and were associated with patient, provider, and practice characteristics.

0 Followers
 · 
111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The present study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of intubation occurring in the ICU and ED of an Australian tertiary teaching hospital. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of intubation practice across the Geelong Hospital over a 6 month period from 1 August 2012 to 31 January 2013. Data were entered by the intubating team through an online data collection form. Results: There were 119 patients intubated and 134 attempts at intubation in the ED and ICU over a 6 month period. The first-pass success rate was 104/119 (87.4%), and all but a single patient was intubated by the second attempt. Propofol, fentanyl, midazolam and suxamethonium were the most common drugs used in rapid sequence induction. AEs were reported in 44/134 (32.8%) of intubation attempts, with transient hypoxia and hypotension being the most common. A significant adverse outcome, namely aspiration pneumonitis, occurred in one patient. There were no peri-intubation deaths. Conclusion: The majority of airways are managed by ICU and ED consultants and trainees, with success rates and AE rates comparable with other published studies.
    Emergency medicine Australasia: EMA 06/2014; 26(4). DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.12257 · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the incidence and associated risk factors of difficult tracheal intubations (TI) in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Using the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS), TI quality improvement data were prospectively collected for initial TIs in 15 PICUs from July 2010 to December 2011. Difficult pediatric TI was defined as TIs by direct laryngoscopy which failed or required more than two laryngoscopy attempts by fellow/attending-level physician providers. A total of 1,516 oral TIs were reported with a median age of 2 years. A total of 97 % of patients were intubated with direct laryngoscopy. The incidence of difficult TI was 9 %. In univariate analysis, patients with difficult TI were younger [median 1 year (0-4) vs. 2 (0-8) years, p = 0.046], and had a reported history of difficult TI (22 vs. 8 %, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that history of difficult airway and signs of upper airway obstruction are significantly associated with difficult TI. The advanced airway provider was more involved as a first provider in difficult TI (81 vs. 58 %, p < 0.001). The presence of difficult TI was associated with higher incidence of oxygen desaturation below 80 % (48 vs. 15 %, p < 0.001), adverse TI associated events (53 vs. 20 %, p < 0.001), and severe TI associated events (13 vs. 6 %, p = 0.003). Difficult TI was reported in 9 % of all TIs and was associated with increased adverse TI events. History of difficult airway and sign of upper airway obstruction were associated with difficult TIs.
    Intensive Care Medicine 08/2014; 40(11). DOI:10.1007/s00134-014-3407-4 · 5.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Objectives Prospective safety data on emergency department (ED) intubation in children are limited. We aimed to describe the practice and adverse events associated with endotracheal intubation in a large urban pediatric ED.Methods Prospective observational study at a tertiary pediatric ED with an annual census of 82 000. The primary outcome measure was the adverse event rate. Secondary outcome measures were incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and first pass success rate without desaturation or hypotension.ResultsOver a 12-month period in 2013, there were 71 intubations in 66 patients (9/10 000 ED visits). Median age was 3 years, with 25% in infants <1 year of age. Indications were as follows: trauma (21%) and medical conditions (79%); most frequently status epileptics (31%). Forty-four percent had cardiovascular compromise, 87% had respiratory compromise, and 70% had a GCS <9 prior to intubation. Adverse events occurred in 39%, the most common being hypotension (21%) and desaturation (14%). One anticipated and one unanticipated difficult laryngoscopy were encountered (both Cormack and Lehane grade 3). Overall first pass success rate was 78%, although first pass success without desaturation or hypotension was only 49%. Seven percent required more than two attempts for successful intubation.Conclusion Intubation of children in the ED is a low-frequency, high-risk procedure. The incidence of adverse events, particularly desaturation and hypotension, is high. The incidence of difficult laryngoscopy is low. First pass success rate without desaturation or hypotension is low. Strategies to avoid desaturation and hypotension in the peri-intubation setting should be prioritized.
    Pediatric Anesthesia 07/2014; 24(12). DOI:10.1111/pan.12490 · 1.74 Impact Factor