Partial Anterior vs Partial Posterior Fundoplication Following Transabdominal Esophagocardiomyotomy for Achalasia of the Esophagus

JAMA SURGERY (Impact Factor: 3.94). 01/2013; 148(1):85-90. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurgery.2013.409
Source: PubMed


OBJECTIVES To review transabdominal esophagocardiomyotomy (surgical treatment of achalasia) of the esophagus and to compare outcomes of partial anterior vs partial posterior fundoplication. DATA SOURCES An electronic search was conducted among studies published between January 1976 and September 2011 using the keywords achalasia, myotomy, antireflux surgery, and fundoplication. STUDY SELECTION Prospective studies of transabdominal esophagocardiomyotomy were selected. DATA EXTRACTION Outcomes selected were recurrent or persistent postoperative dysphagia and an abnormal 24-hour pH test result. Studies were divided into the following 3 groups: myotomy only, myotomy with anterior fundoplication, and myotomy with posterior fundoplication. Studies were weighted by the number of patients and by the follow-up duration. Event rates were calculated using meta-regression of the log-odds with the inverse variance method. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty-nine studies with a total of 2998 patients were identified. The odds of postoperative dysphagia were 0.06 (95% CI, 0.03-0.12) for myotomy only, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.09-0.14) for myotomy with anterior fundoplication, and 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) for myotomy with posterior fundoplication. The odds of a postoperative abnormal 24-hour pH test result were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.12-1.08) for myotomy only, 0.16 (95% CI, 0.11-0.24) for myotomy with anterior fundoplication, and 0.18 (95% CI, 0.13-0.25) for myotomy with posterior fundoplication. The increased odds of postoperative dysphagia in the group undergoing myotomy with anterior fundoplication compared with the group undergoing myotomy with posterior fundoplication were statistically significant (P < .001). However, the incidence of a postoperative abnormal 24-hour pH test result was statistically similar. CONCLUSION Partial posterior fundoplication when combined with an esophagocardiomyotomy may be associated with significantly lower reintervention rates for postoperative dysphagia, while providing similar reflux control compared with partial anterior fundoplication.

Download full-text


Available from: Lee L Swanstrom, Apr 17, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Achalasia is a neurodegenerative motility disorder of the oesophagus resulting in deranged oesophageal peristalsis and loss of lower oesophageal sphincter function. Historically, annual achalasia incidence rates were believed to be low, approximately 0.5-1.2 per 100000. More recent reports suggest that annual incidence rates have risen to 1.6 per 100000 in some populations. The aetiology of achalasia is still unclear but is likely to be multi-factorial. Suggested causes include environmental or viral exposures resulting in inflammation of the oesophageal myenteric plexus, which elicits an autoimmune response. Risk of achalasia may be elevated in a sub-group of genetically susceptible people. Improvement in the diagnosis of achalasia, through the introduction of high resolution manometry with pressure topography plotting, has resulted in the development of a novel classification system for achalasia. This classification system can evaluate patient prognosis and predict responsiveness to treatment. There is currently much debate over whether pneumatic dilatation is a superior method compared to the Heller's myotomy procedure in the treatment of achalasia. A recent comparative study found equal efficacy, suggesting that patient preference and local expertise should guide the choice. Although achalasia is a relatively rare condition, it carries a risk of complications, including aspiration pneumonia and oesophageal cancer. The risk of both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus is believed to be significantly increased in patients with achalasia, however the absolute excess risk is small. Therefore, it is currently unknown whether a surveillance programme in achalasia patients would be effective or cost-effective.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 09/2013; 19(35):5806-5812. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v19.i35.5806 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare symptomatic and objective outcomes between HM and POEM. The surgical gold standard for achalasia is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM) and partial fundoplication. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a less invasive flexible endoscopic alternative. We compare their safety and efficacy. Data on consecutive HMs and POEMs for achalasia from 2007 to 2012 were collected. Primary outcomes: swallowing function-1 and 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes: operative time, complications, postoperative gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). There were 101 patients: 64 HMs (42% Toupet and 58% Dor fundoplications) and 37 POEMs. Presenting symptoms were comparable. Median operative time (149 vs 120 min, P < 0.001) and mean hospitalization (2.2 vs 1.1 days, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher for HMs. Postoperative morbidity was comparable. One-month Eckardt scores were significantly better for POEMs (1.8 vs 0.8, P < 0.0001). At 6 months, both groups had sustained similar improvements in their Eckardt scores (1.7 vs 1.2, P = 0.1).Both groups had significant improvements in postmyotomy lower esophageal sphincter profiles. Postmyotomy resting pressures were higher for POEMs than for HMs (16 vs 7.1 mm Hg, P = 0.006). Postmyotomy relaxation pressures and distal esophageal contraction amplitudes were not significantly different between groups. Routine postoperative 24-hour pH testing was obtained in 48% Hellers and 76% POEMs. Postoperatively, 39% of POEMs and 32% of HM had abnormal acid exposure (P = 0.7). POEM is an endoscopic therapy for achalasia with a shorter hospitalization than HM. Patient symptoms and esophageal physiology are improved equally with both procedures. Postoperative esophageal acid exposure is the same for both. The POEM is comparable with laparoscopic HM for safe and effective treatment of achalasia.
    Annals of surgery 10/2013; 259(6). DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000268 · 8.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The optimal anti-reflux procedure after Heller cardiomyotomy for oesophageal achalasia remains unclear. The most commonly used procedure is the anterior partial fundoplication according to Dor, although during recent years the posterior counterpart (Toupet) has become popular. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed achalasia and referred for cardiomyotomy were randomised to receive either an anterior or partial posterior fundoplication following a classical cardiomyotomy. The effect of surgery was assessed during the first postoperative year by Eckardt scores, EORTC QLQ-OES18 scores and HRQL questionnaires. Timed barium oesophagogram (TBO) and ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring were performed to determine oesophageal emptying and the degree of reflux control, respectively. Results: Forty-two patients were randomised into Dor (n = 20) and Toupet (n = 22) groups. Eckardt scores improved dramatically with both procedures, but the EORTC QLQ-OES18 (functional scales) scores revealed significantly better relative improvements in the Toupet group compared to the Dor repair (P = 0.044). Corresponding advantages in favour of Toupet were observed postoperatively in the percentage of oesophageal emptying at TBO (P = 0.011 in height and P = 0.018 in area), an effect not observed in the Dor group. There were no other significant differences recorded between the study groups concerning HRQL evaluations and objective assessment of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux. Conclusions: A partial posterior fundoplication after cardiomyotomy seems to achieve more improvement in oesophageal emptying and EORTC QLQ-OES18 functional scale scores than the anterior fundoplication. Otherwise no differences between the two anti-reflux repairs were noted. Trial registration number: Identifier: NCT01933373.
    International Journal of Surgery (London, England) 05/2014; 12(7). DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.077 · 1.53 Impact Factor
Show more