Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification.

Department of Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066, Blindern, N0316 Oslo, Norway.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution (Impact Factor: 15.35). 11/2008; 24(1):49-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is an apparent gap between the prominence of present theoretical frameworks involving ecological thresholds and regime shifts, and the paucity of efforts to conduct simple tests and quantitative inferences on the actual appearance of such phenomena in ecological data. A wide range of statistical methods and analytical techniques are now available that render these questions tractable, some of them even dating back half a century. Yet, their application has been sparse and confined within a narrow subset of cases of ecological regime shifts. Our objective is to raise awareness on the range of techniques available, and to their principles and limitations, to promote a more operational approach to the identification of ecological thresholds and regime shifts.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our ability to adapt to climate change is not boundless, and previous modeling efforts show that future policy decisions about climate change are affected when adaptation limits are exceeded. Adaptation limits are delineated by capacity thresholds, after which climate damages begin to overwhelm the adaptation response and net adaptation goes negative. The levels of such thresholds depend on the complex interaction of different environmental (climatic and ecological) and human response (technological and societal) systems. In this paper, the interactions among these sub-systems are explored and four novel archetypical climate damage and adaptation response systems are developed. These damage–response systems can be described by the level of their adaptation limits thresholds, the pathways of adaptation capacity degradation and failure, and the recoverability or permanence of such climate losses once the adaptation limits have been surpassed. Policy options upon reaching the limits to adaptation include investment in more of the same technology, implementation of new and more effective adaptation, or transformational adaptation that allows the damage–response system to become more resilient. Attention is drawn to the need for greater understanding of the uncertainties of adaptation limits, how to raise the effective capacities and lifetime ranges of adaptation (and thus delay adaptation failure), and what policy options exist when adaptation limits are breached.
    Environmental Science & Policy 03/2015; 50:214-224. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.003 · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Threshold detection: matching statistical methodology to ecological questions and conservation planning objectives. Avian Conservation and Ecology 10(1): 2. http://dx. ABSTRACT. Two types of ecological thresholds are now being widely used to develop conservation targets: breakpoint-based thresholds represent tipping points where system properties change dramatically, whereas classification thresholds identify groups of data points with contrasting properties. Both breakpoint-based and classification thresholds are useful tools in evidence-based conservation. However, it is critical that the type of threshold to be estimated corresponds with the question of interest and that appropriate statistical procedures are used to determine its location. On the basis of their statistical properties, we recommend using piecewise regression methods to identify breakpoint-based thresholds and discriminant analysis or classification and regression trees to identify classification thresholds. Détection des seuils : choix de la méthode statistique en fonction des questions écologiques et des objectifs de planification de la conservation RÉSUMÉ. À l'heure actuelle, deux types de seuils écologiques sont communément utilisés dans l'élaboration d'objectifs de conservation : alors que les seuils correspondant à un point de rupture représentent le point de basculement où les propriétés du système changent radicalement, les seuils de classification, eux, séparent les données en groupes ayant des propriétés divergentes. Tant les seuils fondés sur le point de rupture que ceux fondés sur la classification sont des outils utiles pour la conservation issue d'observations. Toutefois, le type de seuils que nous cherchons à estimer doit impérativement concorder avec la question qui nous préoccupe, tandis que la méthode statistique utilisée pour déterminer la localisation précise du seuil doit être appropriée. En nous fondant sur leurs propriétés statistiques, nous recommandons l'utilisation d'une méthode de régression par segments pour déterminer un seuil correspondant à un point de rupture et d'une analyse discriminante ou d'un arbre de classification ou de régression pour déterminer un seuil de classification.
    Avian Conservation and Ecology 01/2015; 10(1). DOI:10.5751/ACE-00715-100102 · 0.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biological attributes of ecosystems often change nonlinearly as a function of anthropogenic and natural stress. Plant and animal communities may exhibit zones of change along a stressor gradient that are disproportionate relative to the incremental change in the stressor. The ability to predict such transitions is essential for effective management intervention because they may indicate irreversible changes in ecological processes. Despite the importance of recognizing transition zones along a stressor gradient, few, if any, investigators have examined these responses across multiple taxa, and no community threshold studies have been reported at large geographic scales. We surveyed benthic macroinvertebrate, fish, bird, diatom, and plant communities in coastal wetlands across a geospatially referenced gradient of anthropogenic stress in the Laurentian Great Lakes. We used Threshold Indicator Taxon Analysis (Baker and King 2010) to analyze each community's response to identify potential zones of disproportionate change in community structure along gradients of major watershed-scale stress: agriculture and urban/suburban development. Our results show surprising congruence in community thresholds among different taxonomic groups, particularly with respect to % developed land in the watershed. We also analyzed uncertainty associated with the community-specific thresholds to understand the ability of different assemblages to predict stress. The high and congruent sensitivity of assemblages to development demonstrates that watershed-scale stress has discernible effects on all biological communities, with increasing potential for ecosystem-scale functional changes. These findings have important implications for identifying reference-condition boundaries and for informing management and policy decisions, in particular, for selecting freshwater protected areas.
    Freshwater science 09/2014; 33(3):958-971. DOI:10.1086/676913 · 1.42 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014