Energy expenditure of gazing cows and cows fed grass indoors as determined by the 13C bicarbonate dilution technique using an automatic blood sampling system

Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, 1725 Posieux, Switzerland.
Journal of Dairy Science (Impact Factor: 2.55). 04/2011; 94:1989-2005. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3658
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objectives of the study were to assess the 13C bicarbonate
dilution technique using an automatic blood
sampling system and to use this technique to estimate
energy expenditure (EE) based on the CO2 production
of 14 lactating Holstein cows on pasture or in a freestall
barn. The effects of physical activity and eating
behavior on EE were also assessed. Cows were exposed
to each feeding system in a crossover design with two
14-d experimental periods, each consisting of an adaptation
period and a 7-d data collection period. Cows
either grazed on pasture or had ad libitum access, in
the freestall barn, to grass cut daily from the same paddock.
All cows were supplemented with a cereal-based
concentrate. The EE of each cow was determined from
0700 to 1300 h on 1 d of each collection period. Blood
samples for the 13C bicarbonate dilution technique were
taken either manually in the barn or using an automatic
blood sampling system on pasture. Eating pattern and
physical activity were recorded from 0700 to 1300 h
using a behavior recorder and an activity meter, respectively.
Milk yield was recorded daily. Individual feed
intake was estimated using the alkane double-indicator
technique. Two preceding experiments confirmed that
the sampling technique (manual or automatic) and the
following storage of the blood samples (frozen directly
after withdrawal or first cooled on ice and then frozen
6 h later) had no effect on 13CO2 enrichment in the extracted
blood CO2 or on the subsequent calculation of
CO2 production. During the 6-h measurement period,
the EE of cows on pasture was higher than that of
cows in the freestall barn. Daily feed intake and milk
production were not affected by the feeding treatment.
Grazing cows spent more time walking and less time
standing and lying than did cows fed indoors. Time
spent eating was greater and time spent ruminating
was lower for cows on pasture compared with grass-fed cows in the barn. In conclusion, the 13C bicarbonate
dilution technique, combined with an automatic blood
sampling system, is a suitable method to determine the
EE of lactating dairy cows on pasture. Positive correlations
between EE and walking and eating time indicate
that the higher energy requirements of dairy cows on
pasture may be at least partly caused by a higher level
of physical activity. However, before specific recommendations
about additional energy supply can be given,
it must be determined whether EE measured over 6 h
can be extrapolated to 24 h. Furthermore, the apparent
inconsistency between EE, feed intake, and milk
production needs to be resolved.

Download full-text


Available from: Peter Junghans, Aug 30, 2015
    • "Plant secondary compounds, such as tannins, have been indicated as a ruminal VA enhancer (Khiaosa-ard et al., 2009; Vasta et al., 2009), but these components are not substantially present in grass-dominated pastures anyway. Again, we hypothesized that, besides selection, differences in intake (i.e., rumen fill) and rumination patterns (Kaufmann et al., 2011) could play a key role. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A meta-analysis was conducted using the results of 82 experiments (78 publications, 266 treatments) to investigate the importance of dietary C18 fatty acids (FA) and feeding regimen for milk C18 FA profile and apparent recovery of selected FA relative to intake of these FA or their precursors. Feeding treatments based on lipid-supplemented diets were excluded. Feeding regimens were defined as grazing [including partial and full-time grazing, at dietary concentrate proportions from 0 to 44% dry matter (DM)], forage-based indoor feeding [>65% forage of total DM intake (DMI)], and concentrate-based indoor feeding (forage DMI ≤65% of DMI). Linoleic acid (LLA), α-linolenic acid (ALA), and total C18 FA proportions in milk fat increased linearly with the respective dietary FA content in all feeding regimens tested. This effect was highest in the forage-based indoor feeding. Slopes were lowest for the grazing regimens, especially regarding ALA and the sum of all C18 FA, whereas the intercepts of the prediction equations of milk ALA and total C18 FA proportions were highest for grazing regimens. This indicates that, in grazing cows, factors other than dietary FA contents determine the C18 FA composition of the milk fat. At equal dietary LLA contents, the type of feeding regimen showed no significant effect on LLA proportion in milk fat. Milk fat proportions of rumenic acid and vaccenic acid were positively related to the sum of dietary ALA and LLA contents. Grazing regimens led to the strongest enrichment of rumenic acid and vaccenic acid in milk fat. The apparent recovery of ALA, LLA, and total C18 FA (secreted, % of intake), an estimate for transfer efficiency, decreased with increasing dietary content. This relationship followed a nonlinear decay function. When the dietary content of these FA exceeded a certain threshold (about 0.2, 0.8, and 2.8% of DM for ALA, LLA, and total C18 FA, respectively) the recovery in milk remained constant at about 5, 10, and 82% of the ingested ALA, LLA, and total C18 FA, respectively. At dietary proportions below 0.01% ALA and 1.5% total C18 FA of DM, their apparent recovery in milk fat exceeded 100%. In conclusion, a general inverse relationship between dietary C18 FA and the corresponding apparent recovery in milk fat seems to exist. Within this frame, the effect of different types of feeding regimens on the eventual milk C18 FA profile varies. Among them, grazing pastures appears to provide the most variable properties. Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Dairy Science 09/2015; 98:6399-6414. DOI:10.3168/jds.2015-9459 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The US regulations for production of organic milk include a strict prohibition against the use of antimicrobials and other synthetic substances. The effect of these regulations on dairy animal health has not been previously reported. The objective of this study was to characterize disease detection and identify risk factors for selected diseases on organic (ORG) and similarly sized conventional (CON) farms. Dairy herds (n = 292) were enrolled across 3 states (New York, Oregon, Wisconsin) with CON herds matched to ORG herds based on location and herd size. During a single herd visit, information was collected about herd management practices and animal disease occurring in the previous 60 d, and paperwork was left for recording disease occurrences during 60 d after the visit. For analysis, CON herds were further divided into grazing and nongrazing. Poisson regression models were used to assess risk factors for rate of farmer-identified and recorded cases of clinical mastitis, ketosis, and pneumonia. An increased rate of farmer-identified and recorded cases of clinical mastitis was associated with use of CON management, use of forestripping, presence of contagious pathogens in the bulk tank culture, proactive detection of mastitis in postpartum cows, and stall barn housing. An increased rate of farmer-identified and recorded cases of ketosis was associated with having a more sensitive definition of ketosis, using stall barn housing, and feeding a greater amount of concentrates. An increased rate of farmer-identified and recorded cases of pneumonia was associated with a lack of grazing, small or medium herd size, and Jersey as the predominant breed. Overall, disease definitions and perceptions were similar among grazing systems and were associated with the rate of farmer-identified and recorded cases of disease.
    Journal of Dairy Science 05/2013; 96(7). DOI:10.3168/jds.2012-5980 · 2.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the growth performances and carcass characteristics of tropical-breed steers reared in 2 contrasted feeding systems (indoor vs pasture) and slaughtered at different ages (early vs. late). A total of 309 Creole steers (growing at an initial BW of 173 ± 3 kg and an initial age of 252 ± 4 d) were used over a continuous 12-yr study. Indoor steers were housed in a cattle shed, fed fresh-cut grass plus concentrate, and slaughtered at 14.5 or 17.1 ± 0.1 mo of age. Pasture steers were pasture-grazed without supplemental feed, and slaughtered at 17.6 and 21.2 ± 0.1 mo of age. Indoor-fed steers had a greater ADG (786 vs. 517 ± 29 g.d(-1), P < 0.0001) and more carcass fat (164 vs. 145 ± 4.5, P = 0.001) than pasture-fed steers. Late-slaughtered steers had a lower ADG (630 vs. 673 ± 27 g.d(-1), P = 0.001) but greater dressing percentages (hot dressing percentage = 55.7 vs. 54.7 ± 0.34 %; chilled dressing percentage = 54.5 vs. 53.4 ± 0.34 %, P < 0.0001) than early-slaughtered steers. The interaction between feeding system and slaughter age was significant for carcass tissue composition. Whole-carcass muscle content was greater in late-slaughtered steers than early-slaughtered steers, especially in pasture-fed steers (720 vs. 698 ± 6.0, P < 0.0001), but less so in indoor-fed steers (707 vs. 700 ± 5.9, P = 0.046). Furthermore, increasing slaughter age had no effect on carcass fat in indoor-fed steers (162 vs. 166 ± 4.8, P = 0.342), but decreased carcass fat in pasture-fed steers (150 vs. 140 ± 5.0, P = 0.014). The results showed that slaughter age and feeding system are 2 major factors that independently affect most of the growth and carcass traits of tropical-breed steers, but jointly influence tissue deposition. Our study found that in tropical-breed steers that are grazing, late-slaughtering grazing steers increased carcass muscle content without extra fat, thus yielding a carcass quality better suited to consumer choices.
    Journal of Animal Science 06/2013; 91(8). DOI:10.2527/jas.2012-5999 · 1.92 Impact Factor
Show more