Article

Designing and implementing insulin infusion protocols and order sets

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA.
Journal of Hospital Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.08). 09/2008; 3(5 Suppl):42-54. DOI: 10.1002/jhm.366
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Influential trials and guidelines supporting the value of glucose control in hospital settings, particularly in the intensive care and postoperative settings, has led to the widespread adoption of intravenous infusions of human regular insulin. As groups have attempted to study the outcomes or to explore improved methods for improved glucose control, a number of insulin infusion protocols (IIPs) have been reported and validated. Now, many institutions are attempting to translate this experience into clinical practice in a systematic manner. The intent of this discussion is to highlight the authors' practical view of best practices in development and use of IIPs. As the implementation of IIPs has progressed, it has become apparent that this is not a simple process. It requires a carefully planned, inclusive, and continuous effort striving to attain effective glucose control while avoiding severe hypoglycemia. Whereas there are limitations in the literature comparing the IIPs, we identify design elements and implementation methods that increase the chances for staff acceptance and safe attainment of glycemic goals. Most importantly, this must be a team effort with attention to the numerous potential pitfalls that can disrupt the process and place patients at risk. In many cases, it is best to start more conservatively and methodically intensify the protocol. Continuous assessment of protocol errors, adverse events, staff satisfaction, and outcomes is vital to overall success.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
80 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insulin is a top source of adverse drug events in the hospital, and glycemic control is a focus of improvement efforts across the country. Yet, the majority of hospitals have no data to gauge their performance on glycemic control, hypoglycemia rates, or hypoglycemic management. Current tools to outsource glucometrics reports are limited in availability or function. Society of Hospital Medicine (SHM) faculty designed and implemented a web-based data and reporting center that calculates glucometrics on blood glucose data files securely uploaded by users. Unit labels, care type (critical care, non-critical care), and unit type (eg, medical, surgical, mixed, pediatrics) are defined on upload allowing for robust, flexible reporting. Reports for any date range, care type, unit type, or any combination of units are available on demand for review or downloading into a variety of file formats. Four reports with supporting graphics depict glycemic control, hypoglycemia, and hypoglycemia management by patient day or patient stay. Benchmarking and performance ranking reports are generated periodically for all hospitals in the database. In all, 76 hospitals have uploaded at least 12 months of data for non-critical care areas and 67 sites have uploaded critical care data. Critical care benchmarking reveals wide variability in performance. Some hospitals achieve top quartile performance in both glycemic control and hypoglycemia parameters. This new web-based glucometrics data and reporting tool allows hospitals to track their performance with a flexible reporting system, and provides them with external benchmarking. Tools like this help to establish standardized glucometrics and performance standards.
    Journal of diabetes science and technology 05/2014; DOI:10.1177/1932296814532237
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes present unique challenges during an inpatient hospital stay to treat an acute or chronic illness. Upon review of current hospital practice, an interprofessional team embarked on a performance improvement project to improve outcomes for the complex medical-surgical diabetic patient. The methods detailed herein-a comprehensive education plan, preceptorship and peer accountability, active engagement and support by the unit nursing leadership team, and interprofessional collaboration-offer strategies any organization can implement to positively impact diabetes care.
    Journal of vascular nursing: official publication of the Society for Peripheral Vascular Nursing 12/2013; 31(4):150-7. DOI:10.1016/j.jvn.2013.04.004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Children with severe chronic pancreatitis may undergo total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) to relieve pain while minimizing the risk of postsurgical diabetes. Because overstimulation of transplanted islets by hyperglycemia can result in β-cell loss, we developed a specialized intravenous insulin infusion protocol (IIP) for pediatric TPIAT recipients to maintain euglycemia or near-euglycemia posttransplant. Subjects and Methods: Our objective was to review glucose control using an IIP specific for TPIAT recipients at a single institution. We reviewed postoperative blood glucose (BG) levels for 32 children 4-18 years old with chronic pancreatitis who underwent TPIAT between July 2011 and June 2013. We analyzed the proportion of BG values in the range of 70-140 mg/dL, mean glucose, glucose variability, and occurrence of hypoglycemia during the IIP; we also evaluated the transition to subcutaneous therapy (first 72 h with multiple daily injections [MDI]). Results: During IIP, the mean patient BG level was 116±27 mg/dL, with 83.1% of all values in the range of 70-140 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia was rare, with only 2.5% of values <70 mg/dL. The more recent era (n=16) had a lower mean BG and less variability than the early era (first 16 patients) (P≤0.004). Mean glucose level (116 vs. 128 mg/dL) and glucose variability were significantly lower during the IIP compared with MDI therapy (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Tight glycemic control without excessive severe hypoglycemia was achieved in children undergoing TPIAT using an IIP specifically designed for this population; the ability to maintain BG in target range improved with experience with the protocol.
    Diabetes Technology &amp Therapeutics 07/2014; 16(11). DOI:10.1089/dia.2014.0061 · 2.29 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Jan 7, 2015