Clinicians' Implicit Ethnic/Racial Bias and Perceptions of Care Among Black and Latino Patients

Department of Psychology and Neuro-science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
The Annals of Family Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.43). 01/2013; 11(1):43-52. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1442
Source: PubMed


We investigated whether clinicians' explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias is related to black and Latino patients' perceptions of their care in established clinical relationships.

We administered a telephone survey to 2,908 patients, stratified by ethnicity/race, and randomly selected from the patient panels of 134 clinicians who had previously completed tests of explicit and implicit ethnic/racial bias. Patients completed the Primary Care Assessment Survey, which addressed their clinicians' interpersonal treatment, communication, trust, and contextual knowledge. We created a composite measure of patient-centered care from the 4 subscales.

Levels of explicit bias were low among clinicians and unrelated to patients' perceptions. Levels of implicit bias varied among clinicians, and those with greater implicit bias were rated lower in patient-centered care by their black patients as compared with a reference group of white patients (P = .04). Latino patients gave the clinicians lower ratings than did other groups (P <.0001), and this did not depend on the clinicians' implicit bias (P = .98).

This is among the first studies to investigate clinicians' implicit bias and communication processes in ongoing clinical relationships. Our findings suggest that clinicians' implicit bias may jeopardize their clinical relationships with black patients, which could have negative effects on other care processes. As such, this finding supports the Institute of Medicine's suggestion that clinician bias may contribute to health disparities. Latinos' overall greater concerns about their clinicians appear to be based on aspects of care other than clinician bias.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Bronsert, Sep 02, 2014
  • Source
    • "Second, we have addressed the impact of implicit bias only on Black patients. Implicit bias also affects other racial/ethnic minority patients, but it may not appear in the same way or produce the same reactions as among Black patients (Blair et al., 2013). These potential differences, along with similarities , need to be considered when designing interventions that focus on health care disparities that affect other groups. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Around the world, members of racial/ethnic minority groups typically experience poorer health than members of racial/ethnic majority groups. The core premise of this article is that thoughts, feelings, and behaviors related to race and ethnicity play a critical role in healthcare disparities. Social psychological theories of the origins and consequences of these thoughts, feelings, and behaviors offer critical insights into the processes responsible for these disparities and suggest interventions to address them. We present a multilevel model that explains how societal, intrapersonal, and interpersonal factors can influence ethnic/racial health disparities. We focus our literature review, including our own research, and conceptual analysis at the intrapersonal (the race-related thoughts and feelings of minority patients and non-minority physicians) and interpersonal levels (intergroup processes that affect medical interactions between minority patients and non-minority physicians). At both levels of analysis, we use theories of social categorization, social identity, contemporary forms of racial bias, stereotype activation, stigma, and other social psychological processes to identify and understand potential causes and processes of health and healthcare disparities. In the final section, we identify theory-based interventions that might reduce ethnic/racial disparities in health and healthcare.
    European Review of Social Psychology 12/2013; 24(1):70-122. DOI:10.1080/10463283.2013.840973 · 2.18 Impact Factor

  • The Annals of Family Medicine 01/2013; 11(1):2-4. DOI:10.1370/afm.1447 · 5.43 Impact Factor

  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine 03/2013; 45(3). DOI:10.1007/s12160-013-9488-4 · 4.20 Impact Factor
Show more