Racial Differences in Veterans' Satisfaction With Examination of Disability From Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Department of Psychiatry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.41). 01/2013; 64(4). DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed


The examination that determines if a veteran has service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) affects veterans' lives for years. This study examined factors potentially associated with veterans' perception of their examination's quality.

Veterans (N=384) being evaluated for an initial PTSD service-connection claim were randomly assigned to receive either a semistructured interview or the examiner's usual interview. Immediately after the interview, veterans completed confidential ratings of the examinations' quality and of their examiners' interpersonal qualities and competence. Extensive data characterizing the veterans, the 33 participating examiners, and the examinations themselves were collected.

Forty-seven percent of Caucasian veterans and 34% of African-American veterans rated their examination quality as excellent. African Americans were less likely than Caucasians to assign a higher quality rating (odds ratio=.61, 95% confidence interval=.38-.99, p=.047). Compared with Caucasians, African Americans rated their examiners as having significantly worse interpersonal qualities but not lower competence. Ratings were not significantly related to the veterans' age, gender, marital status, eventual diagnosis of PTSD, Global Assessment of Functioning score, the examiner's perception of the prevalence of malingering, or the presence of a third party during the examination.

Ratings of disability examinations were generally high, although ratings were less favorable among African-American veterans than among Caucasian veterans.

Download full-text


Available from: David Afshartous, Mar 09, 2014
1 Follower
18 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is a structured interview for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic status and symptom severity. In the 10 years since it was developed, the CAPS has become a standard criterion measure in the field of traumatic stress and has now been used in more than 200 studies. In this paper, we first trace the history of the CAPS and provide an update on recent developments. Then we review the empirical literature, summarizing and evaluating the findings regarding the psychometric properties of the CAPS. The research evidence indicates that the CAPS has excellent reliability, yielding consistent scores across items, raters, and testing occasions. There is also strong evidence of validity: The CAPS has excellent convergent and discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and sensitivity to clinical change. Finally, we address several concerns about the CAPS and offer recommendations for optimizing the CAPS for various clinical research applications. Depression and Anxiety 13:132–156, 2001 © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Depression and Anxiety 01/2001; 13(3):132 - 156. DOI:10.1002/da.1029 · 4.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most studies examining the clinical impact of disability benefits have compared aid recipients with people who never applied for benefits. Such practices may bias findings against recipients because disability applicants tend to be much sicker than never-applicants. Furthermore, these studies ignore the outcomes of denied claimants. To examine long-term outcomes associated with receiving or not receiving Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability benefits for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the most common mental disorder for which veterans seek such benefits. Comparison of outcomes between successful and unsuccessful applicants for VA disability payments. Because we could not randomize the receipt of benefits, we used exact matching by propensity scores to control for potential baseline differences. We examined clinical outcomes approximately 10 years later. Stratified, nationally representative cohort of 3337 veterans who applied for VA PTSD disability benefits between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1998. Assessment on validated survey measures of PTSD; work, role, social, and physical functioning; employment; and poverty. We compared outcomes with earlier scores. Homelessness and mortality were assessed using administrative data. Of still-living cohort members, 85.1% returned usable surveys. Symptoms of PTSD were elevated in both groups. After adjustment, awardees had more severe PTSD symptoms than denied claimants but were nonetheless more likely to have had a meaningful symptom reduction since their last assessment (-6.1 vs -4.4; SE, 0.1; P = .01). Both groups had meaningful improvements of similar magnitude in work, role, and social functioning (-0.15 vs -0.19; SE, 0.01; P = .94), but functioning remained poor nonetheless. Comparing awardees with denied claimants after adjustment, 13.2% vs 19.0% were employed (P = .11); 15.2% vs 44.8% reported poverty (P < .001); 12.0% vs 20.0% had been homeless (P = .02); and 10.4% vs 9.7% had died (P = .66). Regardless of claim outcome, veterans who apply for PTSD disability benefits are highly impaired. However, receiving PTSD benefits was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in PTSD symptoms and less poverty and homelessness.
    Archives of general psychiatry 10/2011; 68(10):1072-80. DOI:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.105 · 14.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To situate veterans' experience of the Department of Veterans Affairs claims process in a broader context, this study explored the beliefs of veterans service officers (VSOs) about the Department of Veterans Affairs disability claims process for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A mail survey of the county and national VSOs working in Minnesota was performed. Questionnaires included a modified version of the Disability Application Appraisal Inventory. Most VSOs believe thatveterans value the Department of Veterans Affairs disability status for PTSD to obtain validation for what they experienced in the military and that veterans have negative reactions to the claims process for PTSD. VSOs' satisfaction with the claims process was associated with beliefs about its fairness. In general, VSOs' beliefs about the reasons veterans value service connection for PTSD parallel those veterans report. More work is needed to determine how VSOs influence veterans, to determine whether PTSD claimants have special or unique needs as they undergo the claims process, and to explore fairness concerns.
    Military medicine 11/2005; 170(10):867-70. DOI:10.7205/MILMED.170.10.867 · 0.77 Impact Factor
Show more