The daily goals communication sheet: A simple and novel tool for improved communication and care

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Boston, USA.
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 11/2008; 34(10):608-13, 561.
Source: PubMed


This tool directs the health care team to discuss specific goals of care and best-practice safety measures daily for each patient and to ensure goal understanding and implementation.

Download full-text


Available from: Kristen Nelson, Sep 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "Step 5 encourages teams to try tools we developed to improve communication and teamwork. The daily goals checklist is the most well recognized of these tools (Pronovost et al., 2003; Schwartz et al., 2008; Holzmueller et al., 2009) and goes beyond traditional nursing care plans or medical treatment plans. The checklist is a directive that emerged at the crossroads of improvement at Johns Hopkins Hospital. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: a highly successful intervention to reduce infections in intensive care units (ICUs) is now being widely replicated and involved significant nursing leadership. The objective of this manuscript is to describe briefly the intervention, and more explicitly the implications for nursing leadership as quality improvement and patient safety become global healthcare priorities. collaborative cohort study in over 100 ICUs in the United States to implement and evaluate interventions to improve patients' safety. conceptual model aimed at improving clinicians' use of five evidence-based recommendations to reduce rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections rates, with measurement and feedback of infection rates. one hundred and three ICUs contributed 1981 ICU-months of data representing 375,757 catheter-days. The median rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection per 1000 catheter-days decreased from 2.7 infections at baseline to 0 at 3 months after implementation of the study intervention (P ≤ 0·002), and the mean rate per 1000 catheter-days decreased from 7.7 at baseline to 1.4 at 16-18 months of follow-up (P < 0·002). During the sustainability period, the mean bloodstream infection rate did not significantly change from the initial 18 month postimplementation period (-1%, 95% confidence interval -9% to 7%). Eighty seven percent of the original study participants had data available for the sustainability study. broad use of this intervention with achievement of similar results could substantially reduce the morbidity and costs associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections. the initial Michigan study and the follow-up analysis, that demonstrated sustained improvements, are leading to similar projects in other countries, include the Matching Michigan project in England. Discussing not only the technical components of the program, but also the nursing leadership aspects may assist nurses just embarking on this work.
    Nursing in Critical Care 01/2011; 16(1):36-43. DOI:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00400.x · 0.65 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: An evaluation of the quality of resuscitation delivered during simulated pediatric in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At 4:00 A.M. a young man was admitted to the emergency department (ED) at the Johns Hopkins Hospital with an infected hand. He was administered an antibiotic, and the ED physician recommended admission for surgical wound debridement and administration of TV antibiotics. Food and drink were withheld, and the patient was admitted to Weinberg 4C (W4C), a medical-surgical ward, and posted as an add-on surgical case for the day. In the latter part of the afternoon, the patient was hungry and anxious to know when his surgery was scheduled. The patient's nurse contacted the surgical resident who told her that the operating room (OR) schedule was booked solid and to let him eat and then reinstitute NPO [nothing by mouth] status after midnight or surgery the next day. The patient finally ate dinner at around 7:00 P.M. He was still on NPO status on day 2, but still no word of surgery had been received by 6:00 P.M on that day. The nurse again called to find out what time the patient was scheduled for debridement. The response she received was, "Surgery? He's not having surgery! That patient is going home tomorrow." In this case, the surgical team decided that the antibiotics were sufficiently treating the infection and surgical debridement was no longer necessary. However, this change to the patient's care plan was not communicated to the nurse on W4C or the patient. Poor communication between the surgical team, unit nurse, and patient led to increased patient anxiety and discomfort, ineffective coordination of discharge planning, and frustration for the nurse caregiver. Unfortunately, such communication failures are the norm rather than the exception in health care.
    Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety / Joint Commission Resources 08/2009; 35(7):384-8, 341.
Show more