Article

Negligible immunogenicity of terminally differentiated cells derived from induced pluripotent or embryonic stem cells.

1] Transcriptome Research Group, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, Japan [2] PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Kawaguchi 332-0012, Japan.
Nature (Impact Factor: 42.35). 01/2013; DOI: 10.1038/nature11807
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The advantages of using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) instead of embryonic stem (ES) cells in regenerative medicine centre around circumventing concerns about the ethics of using ES cells and the likelihood of immune rejection of ES-cell-derived tissues. However, partial reprogramming and genetic instabilities in iPSCs could elicit immune responses in transplant recipients even when iPSC-derived differentiated cells are transplanted. iPSCs are first differentiated into specific types of cells in vitro for subsequent transplantation. Although model transplantation experiments have been conducted using various iPSC-derived differentiated tissues and immune rejections have not been observed, careful investigation of the immunogenicity of iPSC-derived tissue is becoming increasingly critical, especially as this has not been the focus of most studies done so far. A recent study reported immunogenicity of iPSC- but not ES-cell-derived teratomas and implicated several causative genes. Nevertheless, some controversy has arisen regarding these findings. Here we examine the immunogenicity of differentiated skin and bone marrow tissues derived from mouse iPSCs. To ensure optimal comparison of iPSCs and ES cells, we established ten integration-free iPSC and seven ES-cell lines using an inbred mouse strain, C57BL/6. We observed no differences in the rate of success of transplantation when skin and bone marrow cells derived from iPSCs were compared with ES-cell-derived tissues. Moreover, we observed limited or no immune responses, including T-cell infiltration, for tissues derived from either iPSCs or ES cells, and no increase in the expression of the immunogenicity-causing Zg16 and Hormad1 genes in regressing skin and teratoma tissues. Our findings suggest limited immunogenicity of transplanted cells differentiated from iPSCs and ES cells.

0 Followers
 · 
106 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantations have become a very successful therapeutic approach to treat otherwise life threatening blood disorders. It is thought that stem cell transplantation may also become a feasible treatment option for many non-blood related diseases. So far, however, the limited availability of HLA-matched donors has hindered development of some cell-replacement therapies. The Nobel-prize rewarded findings that pluripotency can be induced in somatic cells via expression of a few transcription factors has led to a revolution in stem cell biology. The possibility to change the fate of somatic cells by expressing key transcription factors has not only been used to generate pluripotent stem cells, but also for directly converting somatic cells into fully differentiated cells of another lineage or more committed progenitor cells. These approaches offer the prospect of generating cell types with a specific genotype de novo, which would circumvent the problems associated with allogeneic cell transplantations. This technology has generated a plethora of new disease-specific research efforts, from studying disease pathogenesis to therapeutic interventions. Here we will discuss the opportunities in this booming field of cell biology and summarize how the scientists in the Netherlands have joined efforts in one area to exploit the new technology.
    Human Gene Therapy 08/2014; 25(10). DOI:10.1089/hum.2014.097 · 3.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human pluripotent stem cells have made a remarkable impact on science, technology and medicine by providing a potentially unlimited source of human cells for basic research and clinical applications. In recent years, knowledge gained from the study of human embryonic stem cells and mammalian somatic cell reprogramming has led to the routine production of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) in laboratories worldwide. hiPSCs show promise for use in transplantation, high throughput drug screening, "disease-in-a-dish" modeling, disease gene discovery, and gene therapy testing. This review will focus on the first application, beginning with a discussion of methods for producing retinal lineage cells that are lost in inherited and acquired forms of retinal degenerative disease. The selection of appropriate hiPSC-derived donor cell type(s) for transplantation will be discussed, as will the caveats and prerequisite steps to formulating a clinical Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) product for clinical trials.
    Experimental Eye Research 06/2014; 123. DOI:10.1016/j.exer.2013.12.001 · 3.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based cell therapies have great potential for regenerative medicine but are also potentially associated with tumorigenic risks. Current rodent models are not optimal predictors of efficiency and safety for clinical application. Therefore, we developed a clinically relevant nonhuman primate model to assess the tumorigenic potential and in vivo efficacy of both undifferentiated and differentiated iPSCs in autologous settings without immunosuppression. Undifferentiated autologous iPSCs indeed form mature teratomas in a dose-dependent manner. However, tumor formation is accompanied by an inflammatory reaction. On the other hand, iPSC-derived mesodermal stromal-like cells form new bone in vivo without any evidence of teratoma formation. We therefore show in a large animal model that closely resembles human physiology that undifferentiated autologous iPSCs form teratomas, and that iPSC-derived progenitor cells can give rise to a functional tissue in vivo.

Preview

Download
4 Downloads
Available from