Article

Health-Related Quality of Life After Surgical Removal of an Eye

and †Department of Ophthalmology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery (Impact Factor: 0.91). 01/2013; 29(1):51-6. DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e318275b754
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT : This study compared the general health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and the vision-specific HRQOL in patients following the surgical removal of 1 eye who had good vision in the remaining eye to a group of binocular patients with good vision in OU.
: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12 and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire HRQOL surveys were administered to 29 patients who had surgical removal of an eye who attended an ocular prosthetics clinic and to 25 binocular persons who accompanied a patient. All subjects in each group had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Overall statistical significance was tested using Cramer's V followed by individual t tests for independent groups for each of the scales on the 2 questionnaires to determine whether the means between the 2 groups differed statistically.
: The patient group had a mean age of 50.98 years (range, 19-76 years). The control group had a mean age of 49.46 years (range, 18-76 years). The mean time after loss of vision was 28.03 years (range, 1-71 years), and the mean time from surgical removal of the eye was 23.6 years (range, 0.5-59.5 years). There was an overall significant difference between the 2 groups on the 15 derived subscales of the 2 forms (Cramer's V, p = 0.0025). Three general HRQOL subscales (Short Form 12-mental component summary, Short Form 12 physical component summary, and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-General Health) showed no differences between the 2 groups (p = 0.48, p = 0.81, and p = 0.78, respectively). Three of the 12 vision-specific National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire subscales demonstrated statistically significant differences between the patient and control groups: peripheral vision (p = 0.0006), role difficulties (p = 0.015), and the composite score (p = 0.014). In addition, 2 monocular patients had given up driving compared with no binocular subjects (p = 0.056).
: This population of monocular patients had general physical and mental HRQOL equivalent to the normal binocular group despite the surgical removal of 1 eye. However, the reduced vision-specific HRQOL of monocular patients on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire indicates that there are substantial residual visual deficits even after prolonged monocular status.

Full-text

Available from: James Vernon Odom, May 01, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
102 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effect of visual field defects on driving performance, and to predict practical fitness to drive. The driving performance of 87 subjects with visual field defects due to ocular abnormalities was assessed on a driving simulator and during an on-road driving test. The final score on the on-road driving test and simulator indexes, such as driving speed, viewing behavior, lateral position, time-headway, and time to collision. Subjects with visual field defects showed differential performance on measures of driving speed, steering stability, lateral position, time to collision, and time-headway. Effective compensation consisted of reduced driving speed in cases of central visual field defects and increased scanning in cases of peripheral visual field defects. The sensitivity and specificity of models based on vision, visual attention, and compensatory viewing efficiency were increased when the distance at which the subject started to scan was taken into account. Subjects with visual field defects demonstrated differential performance on several driving simulator indexes. Driving examiners considered reduced speed and increased scanning to be valid compensation for central and peripheral visual field defects, respectively. Predicting practical fitness to drive was improved by taking driving simulator indexes into account.
    Archives of Ophthalmology 12/2002; 120(11):1509-16. · 4.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine if quality of life differs between patients with choroidal melanoma treated with enucleation and those treated with radiation therapy. Patients treated for choroidal melanoma at 5 Midwest centers were asked to participate. There were 65 participants treated with enucleation and 82 treated with radiation therapy. Quality of life was assessed using the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and by the Time-Tradeoff interview method. The average length of follow-up was 4.9 years for the group treated with radiation therapy and 6.3 years for the group treated with enucleation (P = .05). After adjusting for age, sex, years of follow-up, and the number of chronic conditions, there were few differences in any of the quality-of-life measures by treatment status. Participants in the group treated with radiation therapy were more likely to have higher (better) scores on the Vitality and Mental Component subscales of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36 than participants treated with enucleation. There were no differences on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire or the Time-Tradeoff measures of quality of life. Choice of treatment for choroidal melanoma does not seem to be associated with large differences in quality of life in long-term follow-up.
    Archives of Ophthalmology 05/1999; 117(4):461-7. · 4.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recovery after loss of one eye requires an adjustment to monocular vision and resolution of a significant, serious emotional trauma. The impact on everyday life is not well documented. We surveyed 125 monocular patients by questionnaire regarding their recovery. Eighty-five of 125 respondents reported that loss of one eye had not changed their life in any permanent way. Only seven reported persistent visual problems, whereas 12 described problems in employment and 21 had anxiety or poor self-image. Among 49 adults who had suddenly lost a sighted eye, 50% reported that their adjustment period for driving, work, recreation, home activities, or walking was less than 1 month. Ninety-three percent thought that their adjustment was completed by 1 year. In conclusion, most patients were able to resume everyday activities after a short period of adjustment. Problems with employment and self-image were frequent, but visual problems were unusual.
    Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 02/1988; 4(3):135-8. DOI:10.1097/00002341-198804030-00002 · 0.91 Impact Factor