An Evidenced-Based Examination of the Epidemiology and Outcomes of Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears

Sports Medicine Program, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.19). 01/2013; 29(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to better define the epidemiology, mechanism of injury, tear characteristics, outcomes, and healing of traumatic rotator cuff tears. A secondary goal was to determine if sufficient evidence exists to recommend early surgical repair in traumatic rotator cuff tears. METHODS: An independent systematic review was conducted of evidence Levels I to IV. A literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews was conducted, with 3 reviewers assessing studies for inclusion, methodology of individual study, and extracted data. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Average patient age was 54.7 (34 to 61) years, and reported mean time to surgical intervention, 66 days (3 to 48 weeks) from the time of injury. The most common mechanism of injury was fall onto an outstretched arm. Supraspinatus was involved in 84% of tears, and infraspinatus was torn in 39% of shoulders. Subscapularis tears were present in 78% of injuries. Tear size was <3 cm in 22%, 3 to 5 cm in 36%, and >5 cm in 42%. Average active forward elevation improved from 81° to 150° postoperatively. The weighted mean postoperative UCLA score was 30, and the Constant score was 77. CONCLUSIONS: Traumatic rotator cuff tears are more likely to occur in relatively young (age 54.7), largely male patients who suffer a fall or trauma to an abducted, externally rotated arm. These tears are typically large and involve the subscapularis, and repair results in acceptable results. However, insufficient data prevent a firm recommendation for early surgical repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review Levels III and IV studies.

Download full-text


Available from: Seth L Sherman, Feb 09, 2015
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery 02/2013; 29(2):191-192. DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.012 · 3.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ➤ Several studies have noted that increasing age is a significant factor for diminished rotator cuff healing, while biomechanical studies have suggested the reason for this may be an inferior healing environment in older patients.➤ Larger tears and fatty infiltration or atrophy negatively affect rotator cuff healing.➤ Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, double-row repairs, performing a concomitant acromioplasty, and the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) do not demonstrate an improvement in structural healing over mini-open rotator cuff repairs, single-row repairs, not performing an acromioplasty, or not using PRP.➤ There is conflicting evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols using early motion over immobilization following rotator cuff repair.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 05/2014; 96(9):778-88. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.M.00583 · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine whether younger patients had a similar response to repair of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (RCT) as older patients. Methods A secondary analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data of patients with full-thickness RCTs. Patients were categorized into patients <55 years of age and patients 55 and older. Patient-related outcome measures of disability at 2 years following surgery were the Short Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (Short WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon’s (ASES) assessment form, and absolute Constant–Murley score (ACMS). Results Review of the database between 2001 and 2011 identified 344 patients (median age 62, range 24–90). Of these, 83 (24 %) patients were younger than 55 years of age (median age 48, range 24–54) and 261 (76 %) were in the older age group (median age 66, range 55–90). The median follow-up was 24 months (range 23–25). Patients in the younger age group had a higher prevalence of traumatic events (p = 0.02), had sustained more work-related injuries (p < 0.0001), and had a higher ratio of smaller tears (p = 0.0001). No difference was seen between groups with respect to post-operative scores of Short WORC, ASES, or ACMS. Pre-operative scores, having a work-related claim, increased tear size, and concomitant procedures affected the 2-year outcome scores. Conclusion This study shows that younger patients with full-thickness RCTs who undergo an arthroscopic repair do as well as older individuals regardless of the measure used to document their recovery. Level of evidence Retrospective outcome study, Level II.
    Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy 06/2014; 23(2). DOI:10.1007/s00167-014-3094-2 · 2.84 Impact Factor
Show more