Adult Smokers’ Reactions to Pictorial Health Warning Labels on Cigarette Packs in Thailand and Moderating Effects of Type of Cigarette Smoked: Findings From the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey

VicHealth Centre for Tobacco Control, The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (Impact Factor: 2.81). 01/2013; 15(8). DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nts241
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to examine, in Thailand, the impact on smokers' reported awareness of and their cognitive and behavioral reactions following the change from text-only to pictorial warnings printed on cigarette packs. We also sought to explore differences by type of cigarette smoked (roll-your-own [RYO] vs. factory-made [FM] cigarettes). METHODS: Data came from the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia Survey, conducted in Thailand and Malaysia, where a representative sample of 2,000 adult smokers from each country were recruited and followed up. We analyzed data from one wave before (Wave 1) and two waves after the implementation of the new pictorial warnings (two sets introduced at Waves 2 and 3, respectively) in Thailand, with Malaysia, having text-only warnings, serving as a control. RESULTS: Following the warning label change in Thailand, smokers' reported awareness and their cognitive and behavioral reactions increased markedly, with the cognitive and behavioral effects sustained at the next follow-up. By contrast, no significant change was observed in Malaysia over the same period. Compared to smokers who smoke any FM cigarettes, smokers of only RYO cigarettes reported a lower salience but greater cognitive reactions to the new pictorial warnings. CONCLUSIONS: The new Thai pictorial health warning labels have led to a greater impact than the text-only warning labels, and refreshing the pictorial images may have helped sustain effects. This finding provides strong support for introducing pictorial warning labels in low- and middle-income countries, where the benefits may be even greater, given the lower literacy rates and generally lower levels of readily available health information on the risks of smoking.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We used a structured approach to assess whether active smokers presented with pictorial warnings on cigarette packages (PWCP) had a higher probability of quitting, reducing, and attempting to quit smoking than did unexposed smokers. We identified 21 articles from among nearly 2500 published between 1993 and 2013, prioritizing coverage over relevance or quality because we expected to find only a few studies with behavioral outcomes. We found very large heterogeneity across studies, poor or very poor methodological quality, and generally null or conflicting findings for any explored outcome. The evidence for or against the use of PWCP is insufficient, suggesting that any effect of PWCP on behavior would be modest. Determining the single impact of PWCP on behavior requires studies with strong methodological designs and longer follow-up periods. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print August 14, 2014: e1-e20. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302129).
    American Journal of Public Health 08/2014; 104(10):e1-e20. DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302129 · 4.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To compare perceptions of text and pictorial warning labels on cigarette packs among Ghanaian smokers and nonsmokers and explore their views on the introduction of pictorial warnings in Ghana. Methods: Qualitative study involving 12 focus group discussions with 50 smokers and 35 nonsmokers aged 15 and over in Kumasi, Ghana. Semi-structured discussion guides alongside visual discussant aids were used to explore the perception, acceptance, and potential use of pictorial warning labels in Ghana. Results: Health warnings combining text and a picture (pictorial) were perceived by both smokers and nonsmokers to communicate health messages more effectively than text-only or picture-only warnings. The effect of text-only warnings was considered limited by low levels of literacy and those of any health warning on the pack by the common practice of single stick sales. Of the 6 health warnings tested, lung cancer, blindness, stroke, and throat and mouth cancer messages were perceived to have the most impact on smoking behavior, including uptake and quit attempts. Conclusions: Warning labels combining pictures and text have the potential to reduce smoking uptake, increase quit attempts, and reduce smoking appeal among smokers and nonsmokers in Ghana. Measures to prevent single stick sales, or to promote health messages to purchasers of single sticks, are required.
    Nicotine & Tobacco Research 08/2014; 16(12). DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntu127 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the effects of different cigarette package warnings in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom up to 5 years post-implementation. The data came from the International Tobacco Control Surveys. Measures included salience of warnings, cognitive responses, forgoing cigarettes and avoiding warnings. Although salience of the UK warnings was higher than the Australian and Canadian pictorial warnings, this did not lead to greater levels of cognitive reactions, forgoing or avoiding. There was no difference in ratings between the Australian and UK warnings for cognitive responses and forgoing, but the Canadian warnings were responded to more strongly. Avoidance of the Australian warnings was greater than to UK ones, but less than to the Canadian warnings. The impact of warnings declined over time in all three countries. Declines were comparable between Australia and the United Kingdom on all measures except avoiding, where Australia had a greater rate of decline; and for salience where the decline was slower in Canada. Having two rotating sets of warnings does not appear to reduce wear-out over a single set of warnings. Warning size may be more important than warning type in preventing wear-out, although both probably contribute interactively. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email:
    Health Education Research 12/2014; 30(1). DOI:10.1093/her/cyu074 · 1.66 Impact Factor