Primum Non Nocere: Obesity Stigma and Public Health

School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia, .
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (Impact Factor: 0.75). 01/2013; 10(1). DOI: 10.1007/s11673-012-9412-9
Source: PubMed


Several recent anti-obesity campaigns appear to embrace stigmatization of obese individuals as a public health strategy. These approaches seem to be based on the fundamental assumptions that (1) obesity is largely under an individual's control and (2) stigmatizing obese individuals will motivate them to change their behavior and will also result in successful behavior change. The empirical evidence does not support these assumptions: Although body weight is, to some degree, under individuals' personal control, there are a range of biopsychosocial barriers that make weight regulation difficult. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence that stigmatizing obese individuals decreases their motivation to diet, exercise, and lose weight. Public health campaigns should focus on facilitating behavioral change, rather than stigmatizing obese people, and should be grounded in the available empirical evidence. Fundamentally, these campaigns should, first, do no harm.

Download full-text


Available from: Lenny R Vartanian, Jan 20, 2015
1 Follower
22 Reads
  • Source
    • "In fact, recent work showed that reduced diabetes-related distress was related to enhanced health-related behaviors such as medication adherence, diet, and physical activity recommendations (Wagner et al., 2015). Further facilitating healthy lifestyle changes (e.g., improved diet, increased exercise) rather than solely focusing on changing actual weight status may benefit patients for whom weight discrimination is a barrier to disease management (Vartanian & Smyth, 2013). Importantly, our findings may bring awareness to highly prevalent health disparities among members of stigmatized groups that may be considered in clinical practice, future research, and interventions aimed at improving the health status of individuals with type 2 diabetes and, perhaps, other chronic diseases. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the association between attributing self-reported discrimination to weight and diabetes outcomes (glycemic control, diabetes-related distress, and diabetes self-care). A community dwelling sample of 185 adults (mean age 55.4; 80 % White/Caucasian 65 % female) with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c level ≥7.5 %) provided demographic and several self-report measures (including diabetes-related distress, diabetes self-care activities, discrimination, and attributions of discrimination), and had height, weight, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessed by trained research staff as part of a larger research study. Individuals who attributed self-reported discrimination to weight had significantly higher HbA1c levels, higher levels of diabetes-related distress, and worse diabetes-related self-care behaviors (general diet, exercise, and glucose testing). These relationships persisted even when controlling for BMI, overall discrimination, depressive symptoms, and demographic characteristics. Results indicate that the perception of weight stigma among individuals with type 2 diabetes is strongly associated with a range of poor diabetes outcomes. Efforts to reduce exposure to and/or teach adaptive coping for weight stigma may benefit patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine 07/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10865-015-9655-0 · 3.10 Impact Factor
    • "" This assumption, however, stands in stark contrast to the growing literature WEIGHED DOWN BY STIGMA on the effects weight stigma. Little evidence exists to indicate that stigmatizing experiences will lead to weight loss among overweight individuals (Vartanian & Smyth, 2013; but see Latner, Wilson, Jackson, & Stunkard, 2009). Rather, there is growing evidence that weight stigmatizing experiences promote weight gain over time (Hunger & Tomiyama, 2014; Jackson, Beeken, & Wardle, 2014; Sutin & Terraciano, 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight stigma is pervasive, and a number of scholars argue that this profound stigma contributes to the negative effects of weight on psychological and physical health. Some lay individuals and health professionals assume that stigmatizing weight can actually motivate healthier behaviors and promote weight loss. However, as we review, weight stigma is consistently associated with poorer mental and physical health outcomes. In this article, we propose a social identity threat model elucidating how weight stigma contributes to weight gain and poorer mental and physical health among overweight individuals. We propose that weight-based social identity threat increases physiological stress, undermines self-regulation, compromises psychological health, and increases the motivation to avoid stigmatizing domains (e.g., the gym) and escape the stigma by engaging in unhealthy weight loss behaviors. Given the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the US, weight stigma thus has the potential to undermine the health and wellbeing of millions of Americans.
    Social and Personality Psychology Compass 06/2015; 9(6). DOI:10.1111/spc3.12172
  • Source
    • "Since some anti-obesity campaigns support weight loss as a core public health strategy, this could lead obese people to engage in HWCB, but also in UWCB, a finding supported by our data. Thus, rather than focusing exclusively on weight, inadvertently stigmatizing obese individuals (Vartanian & Smyth, 2013), public health campaigns should follow a wellness approach focusing on overall health. Furthermore, as eating disorders and obesity share some risk factors, such as engagement in WCB, prevention should be based on an integrated approach (Sánchez-Carracedo, Neumark- Sztainer, & López-Guimerà, 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between sociocultural influences to attain an ideal body and body change strategies (BCS) in Spanish adolescent boys of different weight status. A total of 594 Spanish boys (M = 13.94 years, SD = 0.20) participated. Measures included in the study were weight status according to body mass index (BMI), sociocultural influences (perceived pressures to attain an ideal body, general internalization of an ideal body, internalization of an athletic-ideal body), BCS to lose/control weight (dieting, healthy and unhealthy weight-control behaviors), and BCS to gain weight and muscles. Underweight boys engaged more frequently in weight-gain behaviors. Overweight boys reported higher levels of perceived sociocultural pressures and general internalization compared to normal-weight boys, and were more likely to be engaged in BCS to lose/control weight compared with the other weight-status groups. There were no differences between groups in terms of internalization of an athletic-ideal body and BCS to increase muscles. Future research and prevention programs should consider male-specific behaviors and weight-status differences.
    Eating Behaviors 09/2014; 15(4). DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.09.001 · 1.58 Impact Factor
Show more