Multidisciplinary approach decreases length of stay and reduces cost for ventricular assist device therapy

Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.16). 10/2008; 8(1):84-8. DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.187377
Source: PubMed


High implantation costs and long postoperative length of stay (LOS) in debilitated patients complicate ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy. Between July 2000 and February 2005, 30 patients received a VAD at our institution. Of those, 20 patients were successfully discharged from the hospital with VADs. In August 2003, a multidisciplinary team was formed consisting of all services for VAD patients to replace a single-discipline (cardiac surgery) system. This team evaluated potential VAD candidates and identified optimal timing for implantation. These 20 VAD patients were divided into two groups according to the initiation of multidisciplinary team; the traditional group (n=7, July 2000-July 2003) and the multidisciplinary group (n=13, August 2003-February 2005). Patient demographics were not different. The LOS decreased from 61 to 15 days (P<0.01), especially LOS on the floor decreased from 35 to 7 days (P=0.03). The floor cost was significantly reduced ($47,111 vs. $8742, P<0.01), leading to a decrease in total postoperative cost ($202,238 vs. $161,744, P<0.01). The 30-day readmission rate decreased (5/7 patients vs. 1/13 patients, P<0.01). A multidisciplinary approach significantly decreased LOS and cost after VAD therapy, mostly by decreasing the cost of routine non-ICU care, without increasing the readmission rate.

Download full-text


Available from: Maryl R Johnson, Nov 01, 2014
24 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rate of infection in patients who require ventricular assist devices (VADs) is estimated at more than 35%. Infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms in VAD recipients present a high mortality rate. Daptomycin (Cubicin, Novartis, Nuremberg, Germany), a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, is useful for MDR gram-positive organisms. We report the successful use of daptomycin in patients presenting with MDR gram-positive infections after VAD implantation. We retrospectively studied nine consecutive patients presenting with resistant gram-positive infections after VAD implantation treated with daptomycin. We analyzed type of VAD, type of infection, responsible microorganism, outcome, and adverse events. We studied nine patients (eight males, one female), of overall mean age of 51 +/- 8 years; 78% required a biventricular assist device or a left VAD (Berlin Heart, Berlin, Germany), 22% received other ventricular support. Sixty-six percent presented with catheter-related infections (CRIs). Therapy with daptomycin was empirically initiated in all cases. The initial dose was 6 mg/kg, continued at 4 mg/kg. The mean duration of therapy was 16 +/- 5 days. The reported pathogens were MRSA, 33%; E. faecium, 25%; methicillin-resistant staphylococcus epidermidis, 12.5%; methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus, 12.5%; others, 17%. Successful outcomes were reported in seven subjects (78%), with two patients succumbing due to multiorgan failure related to their heart condition prior completing antibiotic therapy. No adverse events were reported. Among our VAD patients, daptomycin proved efficient as a therapy for CRI with bacteremia. However, controlled studies are necessary to evaluate this antibiotic in patients presenting with VAD and MDR bacteremia.
    Transplantation Proceedings 07/2009; 41(6):2589-91. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.126 · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the last decades, the disparity between the organ supply and the demand for kidney transplantation in Europe has led to consider living donors as a more acceptable option. In the last 7 years, we have established an interdisciplinary supporting transplant team to increase the rate of living donation. After 2001, the new interdisciplinary transplant team consisted of a transplant surgeon, a nephrologist, a pediatrician, a radiologist, a psychologist, a transplant coordinator, and a transplant nurse. We performed a prospective analysis to examine the effect of implementing this team on our living donation program. Demographic data, the annual number of procedures, the duration of waiting, and the cold ischemia time were evaluated among brain-dead and living donors. From January 2002 until December 2008, the number of patients who were annually on the waiting list increased 42% (from 377 to 536 patients). Consequently, the number of the total kidney transplants increased from 81 to 120 with an annual median of 98 cases. By implementing the interdisciplinary transplant team, a significant increase of living kidney donors was observed: from 18 to 42 cases; median = 27). In the last 7 years, a total number of 796 kidney transplants have been performed: 567 from brain-dead and 229 from living donors. In 2001, the waiting list times for recipients who received grafts from brain-dead versus living donors were 1356 versus 615 days respectively. Compared with 2008, the duration on the waiting list decreased significantly for patients receiving a living donor graft, whereas there was a slight increase for the patients in the brain-dead group: brain death versus living donors: 1407 versus 305 days. The interdisciplinary approach has also reduced the cold ischemia time for the living donor recipients: 3 hours and 42 minutes in 2001 versus 2 hours and 50 minutes in 2008. During the last years, by implementing an interdisciplinary transplant team, supporting living donor procedures has produce a gradual increase in the number of kidney transplants from living donors with a remarkable decrease in waiting and cold ischemia times, the latter presumably influencing graft quality.
    Transplantation Proceedings 01/2010; 42(1):137-40. DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.12.038 · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-term left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) support as destination therapy (DT) is a promising new alternative for the growing population of patients with advanced heart failure. In this article, we summarize the clinical trials that led to the approval of LVAD use as DT in the US national policies regulating candidate selection and DT center accreditation. We review current guidelines for candidate selection, clinical tools to assess candidate operative risk, and outcomes of DT.
    Journal of Cardiac Surgery 07/2010; 25(4):462-71. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8191.2010.01050.x · 0.89 Impact Factor
Show more