Syndrome appendiculaire chez un homme de 29 ans

Feuillets de Radiologie (Impact Factor: 0.05). 01/2008; DOI: 10.1016/S0181-9801(08)70322-1

ABSTRACT 1. Service d'imagerie médicale, hôpital d'instruction des Armées-Legouest, 27, avenue de Plantières, 57070 Metz. 2. Service de chirurgie viscérale, hôpital d'instruction des Armées-Legouest, 27, avenue de Plantières, 57070 Metz. 3. Service d'accueil des urgences, hôpital d'instruction des Armées-Legouest, 27, avenue de Plantières, 57070 Metz. Observation Un homme de 29ans, sans antécédent, présente depuis deux jours une douleur de la fosse iliaque droite. L'examen clinique retrouve un patient en surcharge pondérale (IMC à 29), apy-rétique, avec une défense à la palpation abdominale. Le bilan biologique met en évidence une hyperleucocytose modérée à 13000GB/mm 3 et une CRP discrètement augmentée à 15mg/l. Une tomodensitométrie abdominale sans injection est réalisée (fig. 1A à 1E) . Quel est votre diagnostic ? Réponse page 62 3 3 3 3 quel est votre diagnostic ?

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the changes in the computed tomographic (CT) appearance of primary epiploic appendagitis. Clinical records and CT scans were reviewed in 10 patients who were initially suspected of having diverticulitis or appendicitis but were later determined to have primary epiploic appendagitis. The scans were obtained at the time of presentation and at follow-up 1-84 weeks later. Initial CT characteristics included mean size of 14 x 21 mm, oval (n = 9) or round (n = 1) shape, mean attenuation of -53 HU, visceral (n = 10) or parietal (n = 7) peritoneal thickening, periappendageal fat stranding (n = 10), adjacent bowel wall thickening (n = 4) or compression (n = 2), and central high-attenuating dot (n = 2). Follow-up CT characteristics included residual abnormality (n = 9); mean size of 10 x 15 mm; oval (n = 6), round (n = 2), or indistinct (n = 1) shape; mean attenuation of -68 HU; visceral (n = 5) or parietal (n = 3) peritoneal thickening; periappendageal fat stranding (n = 1); and central high-attenuating dot (n = 1). CT characteristics of the remnant lesion included smaller lesion with fat attenuation (n = 6), nugget with soft-tissue attenuation (n = 2), and nondescript fat stranding (n = 1). Awareness of the CT appearance of acute and healing primary epiploic appendagitis may help in the differential diagnosis of pericolonic abnormality.
    Radiology 10/1997; 204(3):713-7. DOI:10.1148/radiology.204.3.9280248 · 6.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the appearance at ultrasonography (US) of primary epiploic appendagitis in correlation with computed tomographic (CT) findings. From January 1992 through June 1993, clinical, US, and CT findings were reviewed in 14 patients with primary epiploic appendagitis (seven men and seven women, aged 25-51 years [mean, 39 years 3 months]). Follow-up examinations were performed with US alone (n = 4), with US and CT (n = 3), and with clinical examination (n = 14). Surgery was performed in two patients. The main symptoms were right (n = 3) or left (n = 11) flank pain. US revealed an echogenic mass that was small, ovoid, and noncompressible, located anterolateral to the right colon (n = 3), anterior or anterolateral to the left colon (n = 10), and anteromedial to the left colon (n = 1). CT helped confirm the presence of a fatty lesion in each patient without other inflammatory process in the abdomen. Symptoms resolved within 7 days in 12 patients. Primary epiploic appendagitis has fairly characteristic US and CT features that enable a rapid diagnosis.
    Radiology 06/1994; 191(2):523-6. DOI:10.1148/radiology.191.2.8153333 · 6.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute epiploic appendagitis most commonly manifests with acute lower quadrant pain. Its clinical features are similar to those of acute diverticulitis or, less commonly, acute appendicitis. The conditions that may mimic acute epiploic appendagitis at computed tomography (CT) include acute omental infarction, mesenteric panniculitis, fat-containing tumor, and primary and secondary acute inflammatory processes in the large bowel (eg, diverticulitis and appendicitis). Whereas the location of acute epiploic appendagitis is most commonly adjacent to the sigmoid colon, acute omental infarction is typically located in the right lower quadrant and often is mistaken for acute appendicitis. It is important to correctly diagnose acute epiploic appendagitis and acute omental infarction on CT images because these conditions may be mistaken for acute abdomen, and the mistake may lead to unnecessary surgery. The CT features of acute epiploic appendagitis include an oval lesion 1.5-3.5 cm in diameter, with attenuation similar to that of fat and with surrounding inflammatory changes, that abuts the anterior sigmoid colon wall. The CT features of acute omental infarction include a well-circumscribed triangular or oval heterogeneous fatty mass with a whorled pattern of concentric linear fat stranding between the anterior abdominal wall and the transverse or ascending colon. As CT increasingly is used for the evaluation of acute abdomen, radiologists are likely to see acute epiploic appendagitis and its mimics more often. Recognition of these conditions on CT images will allow appropriate management of acute abdominal pain and may help to prevent unnecessary surgery.
    Radiographics 11/2005; 25(6):1521-34. DOI:10.1148/rg.256055030 · 2.73 Impact Factor